International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Microfinance as Ethical Investments?


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, School of Business, Stockholm University, Sweden
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Responsible investments, SRI, have double or triple bottom-lines. The investor wants financial and some ethical return. Microfinance is offering credit to the poor without collateral security aiming at poverty-reduction and is commonly given to women. This research overview of recent studies of microfinance in India investigates the effects, problems and opportunities of microfinance as a social responsible investment. The overview revealed that, overall, the aims of microfinance are being met, particularly the empowerment of women. The reduction of poverty is also fairly successful, with signs, although uncertain, of long-term effects. Microfinance is also a tool for financial inclusion of the underprivileged. The self-help group (SHG) model, working as social collateral security, is efficient in peer monitoring and main cause for repayment rates over 90 %. The SHGs also have a social role. Problems found were over-indebtedness partly due to unregulated market and in certain cases high interest rates. The conclusion is that responsible investors have mainly two choices in microfinance: the socially directed investment, subsidizing interest rates; and the commercial direction with market based rates. Both ways have ethical risks that the investor must manage. The study also concludes that financial markets can learn from the SHG model of microfinance.

Keywords

Microfinance, India, Ethical Returns, Responsible Investments, Poverty Reduction, Women Empowerment
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anand. (2008). High Cost of Finance in Microcredit Business in Andhra Pradesh (India): Problems and Possible Solutions. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 7(4), pp. 41-62.

  • Arch, G. (2005). Microfinance and Development: Risk and Return from a Policy Outcome Perspective. Journal of Banking Regulation, 6(3), pp. 227-245.

  • Ashta, A., Khan, S. & Otto, P. (2011). Does Microfinance Cause or Reduce Suicides? Policy Recommendations for Reducing Borrower Stress. Working paper, Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1715442.

  • Augsburg, B. & Fouillet, C. (2010).Profit Empowerment: The Microfinance Institution's Mission Drift. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology, 9(3-4), pp. 327-355.

  • Basargekar, P. (2008). Economic Empowerment through Microfinance: An Assessment of CSR Activity run by Forbes Marshall Ltd. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 2(1), pp. 64-74.

  • Bergsma, K. (2011). Does Offering Microsavings Make Sense for Microfinance Institutions? American Economist, 56(2), pp. 15-27.

  • Bhaskar, T. & Subramanian, G. (2011). Loan Recommender System for Microfinance Loans: Increasing Efficiency to Assist Growth. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(4), pp. 334-345.

  • Bhattacharya, S., Banerjee, S. & Mukherjee, S. (2008). Group Lending and Self-Help Groups: Joint Benefit as an Alternative Governance Mechanism. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 17(1), pp. 1-19.

  • Chen, G., Rasmussen, S. & Reille, X. (2010).Growth and Vulnerabilities in Microfinance. CGAP Focus Note, 61. Retrieved from www.cgap.org/publications.

  • Collins, D., Mordurch, J., Rutherford, S. & Ruthven, O. (2008).Portfolios of the Poor: How the World Live on $2 a Day. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt¸ A. & Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance Meets the Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), pp. 167–192.

  • DN. no. (2011). Oljefondet er verdt 3.077 milliarder kroner. Retrieved from www.dn.no/forsiden/borsMarked/article2105821.ece; downloaded 20120415.

  • Devan, J. (2011). Letter to ACORN International. Retrieved from http://acorninternational.org/ reports/megatroublefor microfinance the World Bank response; downloaded20120413

  • Dhar, S. N. (2012). Microfinance in India: Growth, Glitches and Governance. Microfinance and Financial Inclusion in Developing Economies, In Khan, Sinha & Sahu (eds.). Microfinance and Financial Inclusion in Developing Economies Proceedings, pp. 8-14.

  • Dutt, K. L. & Samanta, G. (2006). Constructing Social Capital: Self-Help Groups and Rural Women's Development in India. Geographical Research, 44(3), pp. 285-295.

  • Eurosif. (2010). European SRI Study.Retrieved from www.eurosif.org/research/eurosif-sri-study/2010.

  • Feroze, S. M., Chauhan, A. K., Malhotra, R. & Kadian, K. S. (2011). Factors Influencing Group Repayment Performance in Haryana: Application of Tobit Model. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 24(1), pp. 57-65.

  • Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J. & Koedijk, K. (2011). The Economic Value of Corporate Eco-Efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), pp. 679-704.

  • Hanson, S. (2009). Changing Places Through Women's Entrepreneurship. Economic Geography, 85(3), pp. 245-267.

  • Hudson, R. (2005). Ethical Investing: Ethical Investors and Managers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), pp. 641- 657.

  • Jain, D. (2011). Impact and Sustainability of SHG Bank Linkages on Socio-Economic Conditions of Individuals: A Study of Kathua Region in J & K. International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2(7), pp. 118-136.

  • Jothi, V. N. (2010). Socio-Economic Impact: Microfinancing of Self Help Groups. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 7(1), pp. 91-103.

  • Kochar, A. (2011). The Distributive Consequences of Social Banking: A Microempirical Analysis of the Indian Experience. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 59(2), pp. 251-280.

  • Kumar, B. & Mohanty, B. (2011). Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Development in SAARC Countries with Special Reference to India. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 8(2), pp. 13-22.

  • Kundu, A. & Mitra, S. (2010). Group Lending Scheme Operating Through Primary Agricultural Credit Society: A Critical Assessment. IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, 8(3), pp. 61-77.

  • Markowitz, I., Cobb, D. & Headley, M. (2011). Framing Ambiguity: Insider/Outsiders and the Successful Legitimation Project of the Socially Responsible Mutual Fund Industry. Organization, 19(1), pp. 3-23.

  • Maurya, R. (2011). Women, Microfinance and Financial Inclusion in India. International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2(7), pp. 60-72.

  • Mitra, S. K. (2009). Exploitative Microfinance Interest Rates. Asian Social Science, 5(5), pp. 87-93.

  • Moon, U. (2011). Role of Self Help Group - Bank Linkage Model in Women Empowerment. Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Business Management, 2(6), pp. 47-65.

  • Nagaraj, N., Chandrakanth, M. G., Acker, D., Chengappa, P. G., Shruthi, H. R., Yadava, C. D. & Kanwar, R. (2009). Economic Performance of Self Help Groups in Karnataka with Special Reference to Venkatenahalli in South India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(4), pp. 604- 617.

  • Norwegian Ministry of Finance. (2010).GPFG Responsible Investment. Retrieved from www.regjeringen.no/upload/FIN/brosjyre/2010/spu/english_2010/index.htm

  • Panda, D. K. (2009). Measuring Impacts Of Women Self-help Group-based Microfinance in Eastern India: An Analysis through Econometric Models. Globsyn Management Journal, 3(2), pp. 41-48.

  • Pati, A. D. (2009). Subsidy Impact on Sustainability of SHGs: An Empirical Analysis of Micro Lending through SGSY Scheme. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(2), pp. 276-288.

  • Ray-Bennett, N. S. (2010). The Role of Microcredit in Reducing Women's Vulnerabilities to Multiple Disasters. Disasters, 34(1), pp. 240-260.

  • Roodman, D. (2012). Development as Freedom. CGAP Microfinance Blog, 20120316, Retrieved from http://microfinance. cgap.org/page/2/, downloaded 20120413.

  • Rosenberg, R., Gonzalez, A. & Narain, S. (2009). The New Moneylenders: Are the Poor Being Exploited by High Microcredit Interest Rates? CGAP (occasional paper), 15. Retrieved from www.cgap.org.

  • Sanyal, P. (2009). From Credit to Collective Action: The Role of Microfinance in Promoting Women's Social Capital and Normative Influence. American Sociological Review, 74(4), pp. 529-550.

  • Schicks, J. & Rosenberg, R. (2011). Too Much Microcredit? A Survey of the Evidence on Over-Indebtedness, CGAP (occasional paper), 19. Retrieved from www.cgap.org.

  • Schueth, S. (2003). Socially Responsible Investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), pp. 189- 94.

  • Sengupta, R. & Aubuchon, C. P. (2008). The Microfinance Revolution: An Overview. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 90(1), pp. 9-30.

  • Shetty, N. K. (2008). Microfinance for Micro Enterprise Development: An Inquiry for a New Paradigm. ICFAI Journal of Financial Economics, 6(1), pp. 88-98.

  • Shetty, N. K. (2009). The Microfinance Promise in Financial Inclusion: Evidence from India. IUP Journal of Applied Economics, 8(5 - 6), pp. 174-189.

  • Shetty, S. (2010). Microcredit, Poverty, and Empowerment: Exploring the Connections. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology, 9(3-4), pp. 356-391.

  • Sinha, F. (2005). Access, Use and Contribution of Microfinance in India: Findings from a National Study. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(17), pp. 1714-1719.

  • Sjöström, E. (2011). The Performance of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of Scholarly Studies Published 2008 - 2010. Presented at breakfast meeting for the Swedish 7th Pension Fund, Stockholm, Sweden, Oct. 17.

  • Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical Investment: Whose Ethics, Which Investment? Business Ethics : A European Review, 10(3), pp. 194-205.

  • Stephen, Y. (2010). The ‘Moral Hazards' of Microfinance: Restructuring Rural Credit in India. Antipode, 42(1), pp. 201-223.

  • Swain, R. B. & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does Microfinance Empower Women? Evidence from Self-Help Groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(5), pp. 541-556.

  • Tripathy, K. & Jain, S. K. (2011). A Study of Microfinance as an Innovative Credit Delivery Mechanism in Rural India. IUP Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8(3), pp. 38-58.

  • Vetrivel, S. C., Chandrakumaramangalan, S. (2010). Role of Micro Finance on Women Empowerment through Self Help Groups in Tamil Nadu. Advances in Management, 3(6), pp. 24-30.

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington: Brookings Institution Press

  • Weiss, J. & Montgomery, H. (2005). Great Expectations: Microfinance and Poverty Reduction in Asia and Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 33(3-4), pp. 391- 416.

  • Yunus, M. (2007). Credit for the Poor: Poverty as Distant History. Harvard International Review, Fall, pp. 20-24.


Abstract Views: 376

PDF Views: 0




  • Microfinance as Ethical Investments?

Abstract Views: 376  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bengt Gustavsson
Associate Professor, School of Business, Stockholm University, Sweden

Abstract


Responsible investments, SRI, have double or triple bottom-lines. The investor wants financial and some ethical return. Microfinance is offering credit to the poor without collateral security aiming at poverty-reduction and is commonly given to women. This research overview of recent studies of microfinance in India investigates the effects, problems and opportunities of microfinance as a social responsible investment. The overview revealed that, overall, the aims of microfinance are being met, particularly the empowerment of women. The reduction of poverty is also fairly successful, with signs, although uncertain, of long-term effects. Microfinance is also a tool for financial inclusion of the underprivileged. The self-help group (SHG) model, working as social collateral security, is efficient in peer monitoring and main cause for repayment rates over 90 %. The SHGs also have a social role. Problems found were over-indebtedness partly due to unregulated market and in certain cases high interest rates. The conclusion is that responsible investors have mainly two choices in microfinance: the socially directed investment, subsidizing interest rates; and the commercial direction with market based rates. Both ways have ethical risks that the investor must manage. The study also concludes that financial markets can learn from the SHG model of microfinance.

Keywords


Microfinance, India, Ethical Returns, Responsible Investments, Poverty Reduction, Women Empowerment

References