International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Family Firms, Social Responsibility, and Non-family Member Employees' Identification


Affiliations
1 Marketing Department, Changshu Institute of Technology, China
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The objective of this paper is to find the relationship between family firms' CSR engagement and their non-family member employees' organisational identification. Drawing upon the existing literature on social identity theory, corporate social responsibility and family firms, the author proposes that family firms engage actively in CSR programs in a balanced manner to increase non-family member employees' organisational identification. The findings of the research suggest that by developing and implementing balanced CSR programs, and actively getting engaged in CSR activities, family firms may help their non-family member employees better identify themselves with the firms. The article points out that due to unbalanced CSR resource allocation, family firms face the problem of inefficient CSR program implementation, and are suggested to switch alternatively to an improved scheme. Family firms may be advised to take corresponding steps to select right employees, communicate better with non-family member employees, use resources better and handle firms' succession problems efficiently. The paper extends employees' identification and CSR research into the family firm research domain and points out some drawbacks in family firms' CSR resource allocation while formerly were seldom noticed.

Keywords

Social Responsibility, Family Firm, Social Identification, Organisational Identification
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ali, I., Rehman, K. U., Ali, S. I., Yousaf, J., & Zia, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance. African Journal of Business

  • Management, 4(13), 2796-2801.

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.

  • Barnett, T., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and

  • Practice, 30(6), 837-854.

  • Barney, J. B., Clark, D. N., & Alvarez, S. A. (2003). When do family ties matter? Entrepreneurial market opportunity recognition and resource acquisition in family firms.

  • Bartels, J., Pruyn, A., de Jong, M., & Joustra, I. (2007). Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of

  • Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 173-190.

  • Bingham, J., Gibb Dyer, W., Smith, I., & Adams, G. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4),

  • -585.

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resourceand knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1),

  • -48.

  • Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of

  • Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.

  • Carrasco-Hernandez, A., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2007). The determinants of employee compensation in family firms: Empirical evidence. Family Business Review, 20(3), 215-228.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional coneptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and

  • practice, 28(4), 335-354.

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and

  • Practice, 36(2), 267-293.

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,

  • (5), 555-575.

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999), Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-40.

  • Currás-Pérez, R., Bigné-Alcañiz, E., & Alvarado-Herrera, A. (2009), The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. Journal of

  • Business Ethics, 89(4), 547-564.

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Davies, I. A., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in small-and medium-size enterprises: Investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies. Business Ethics: A

  • European Review, 19(2), 126-139.

  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.

  • Drucker, P. F. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53-63.

  • Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785-802.

  • Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207-230.

  • Ensley, M. D., & Pearson, A.W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict,

  • potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3), 267-284.

  • Evans, W. R., Davis, W. D., & Frink, D. D. (2011). An examination of employee reactions to perceived corporate citizenship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(4), 938-964.

  • Feather, N. T., & Rauter, K. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and

  • work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 81-94.

  • Fuchs, S., & Edwards, M. R. (2011), Predicting pro-change behaviour: The role of perceived organisational justice and organisational identification. Human Resource Management Journal,

  • (1), 39-59.

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007).

  • Socioemotional wealth and business risks in familycontrolled firms: Evidence from spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.

  • Granata, D., & Chirico, F. (2010), Measures of value in acquisitions: Family versus nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 23(4), 341-354.

  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451-465.

  • Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176-190.

  • Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 30(3), 387-409.

  • Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.

  • Houghton, S., Gabel, J., & Williams, D. (2009). Connecting the two faces of CSR: Does employee volunteerism improve compliance? 87(4), 477-494.

  • Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a

  • volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857-878.

  • Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557-569.

  • Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19(2), 103-114.

  • Lépineux, F. (2005). Stakeholder theory, society and social cohesion. Corporate Governance, 5(2), 99-110.

  • Long, R. J. (1978). The effects of employee ownership on organizational identification, employee job attitudes, and organizational performance: A tentative framework and empirical

  • findings. Human Relations, 31(1), 29-48.

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858.

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255.

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rentseeking society. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391-409.

  • Morgan, J. M., Reynolds, C. M., Nelson, T. J., Johanningmeier, A. R., Griffin, M., & Andrade, P. (2004). Tales from the fields: Sources of employee identification in agribusiness. Management

  • Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 360-395.

  • Mozes, M., Josman, Z., & Yaniv, E. (2011). Corporate social responsibility organizational identification and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 310.

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009a). CSR communication in small and medium-sized enterprises: A study of the attitudes and beliefs of middle managers. Corporate Communications: An

  • International Journal, 14(2), 176 - 189.

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009b). Investigating CSR communication in smes: A case study among danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83-93.

  • Paul, W., & Marc, C. (1997). Performance contrasts between family and non-family unquoted companies in the uk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 3(1), 30.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). S The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2007). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85, 136-137.

  • Portney, P. R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and public policy perspective. In B. L. Hay, R. N. Stavins and R. H. K. Vietor (Eds.), Environmental protection and the

  • social responsibility of firms: Perspectives from law, economics, and business, 107-131. RFF Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Portney, P. R. (2008). The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 261-275.

  • Robertson, A. (2007, October 23, 2007). Family-run businesses outperform non-family peers: Research. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-10-23/familyrun-

  • businesses-outperform-non-family-peers/706876

  • Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265-283.

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 38(2),

  • -243.

  • Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1-36.

  • Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9-24.

  • Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management

  • Journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.

  • Solnet, D. (2006). Introducing employee social identification to customer satisfaction research: A hotel industry study. Managing Service Quality, 16(6), 575-594.

  • Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2), 126-139.

  • Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199-208.

  • Uhlaner, L. M., Goor-Balk, H. J., & Masurel, E. (2004). Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of dutch firms. Journal of Small Business and Enerprise Development,

  • (2), 186-194.

  • Vallejo, M. (2008). Is the culture of family firms really different? A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 261-279.

  • Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., & Tissington, P.A. (2004). Should i stay or should i go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational

  • identification and job satisfaction

  • . British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351-360.

  • Van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O., & Wieseke, J. (2006). Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour.

  • British Journal of Management, 17(4), 283-301.


Abstract Views: 493

PDF Views: 0




  • Family Firms, Social Responsibility, and Non-family Member Employees' Identification

Abstract Views: 493  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ang Bao
Marketing Department, Changshu Institute of Technology, China

Abstract


The objective of this paper is to find the relationship between family firms' CSR engagement and their non-family member employees' organisational identification. Drawing upon the existing literature on social identity theory, corporate social responsibility and family firms, the author proposes that family firms engage actively in CSR programs in a balanced manner to increase non-family member employees' organisational identification. The findings of the research suggest that by developing and implementing balanced CSR programs, and actively getting engaged in CSR activities, family firms may help their non-family member employees better identify themselves with the firms. The article points out that due to unbalanced CSR resource allocation, family firms face the problem of inefficient CSR program implementation, and are suggested to switch alternatively to an improved scheme. Family firms may be advised to take corresponding steps to select right employees, communicate better with non-family member employees, use resources better and handle firms' succession problems efficiently. The paper extends employees' identification and CSR research into the family firm research domain and points out some drawbacks in family firms' CSR resource allocation while formerly were seldom noticed.

Keywords


Social Responsibility, Family Firm, Social Identification, Organisational Identification

References