International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Dynamics of Corporate Governance and Sustainability: A Study of the Indian Electricity Generation Industry


Affiliations
1 KIIT School of Management, KIIT University, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper aims to reflect on the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability. Specifically, it aims to gain insights into the relationship between board structure, disclosure, related party transactions, shareholder rights, and board procedure and sustainability performance - economic performance, environmental performance and social equity performance - for the companies in the Indian Electricity Generating Industry. For the study, 286 companies from among the 402 companies listed in CMIE - PROWESS database for the industry were targeted. Although the aim was to take data from all 402 companies, complete data on the directors were available for only 286 companies from the Registrar of Companies. The study covers detailed analysis of corporate governance in these companies based on established theory and the structure of sustainability established. In the end, the positive relationships are summarised and implications for theory are discussed.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Sustainability, Environment, Economic Performance, Social Equity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Balasubranian, N., Vikramyadita, K., & Bernard, B. S. (2008). Firm-level corporate governance in emerging markets: A case study of India. IIM Bangalore Working Paper Series.

  • Chang, S. J. (2008). Business-society reciprocity as a guideline for global corporate governance. International Finance Review, 9, 81-96.

  • David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 91-100.

  • Gilson, R. J., & Roe, M. J. (1999). Lifetime employment: Labour peace and the evolution of japanese corporate governance. Columbia Law Review, 99(2), 508-540.

  • Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(5), 641-655.

  • Iatridis, G. E. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, 14(1), 55-75.

  • Jackson, G. (2005). Towards a comparative perspective on corporate governance and labour management: Enterprise coalitios and national trajectories. In G. F. Howard, & A. P. Gospel, Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison (pp. 284-309). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Jackson, K. (2008). Natural law, human rights and corporate reputational capital in global governance. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 440-455.

  • Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.

  • Kocmanova, & Alena. (2011). Corporate Governance and Sustainability. Economics & Management, 16, 543-550.

  • Lawrence, S., Collins, E., & Roper, J. (2013). Expanding responsibilities of corporate governance: The incorporation of CSR and sustainability. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 49-63.

  • Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477-509.

  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13-29.

  • Mueller, D. C. (2006). Corporate governance and economic performance. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(5), 623-643.

  • Porter, M. E., & Mark, K. R. (2007). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advatage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review.

  • Richard, A., Johnson, & Daniel, G. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.

  • Robert, K. H. (2000). Tool and concepts for sustainable developmet, how do they relate to a framework for sustainable development, and each other? Journal of Clear Production, 8(3), 243-254.

  • Rogers, K., & Hudson, B. (2011). The triple bottom line: The synergies of transformative perceptions and practices for sustainability. OD Practitioner, 43(4), 3-9.

  • Saltaji, & Issam, M. (2013). Corporate governance relation with corporate sustainability. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 8(2), 137-147.

  • Schneider, A., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Corporate Governance in a Risk Society. Journal of Business Ethics , 1-15.

  • Varshney, P., Kaul, V. K., & Vasal, V. K. (2013). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: A study of select Indian firms. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(4), 341-395.

  • Walls, J. L., Berrone, P. B., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885-913.


Abstract Views: 290

PDF Views: 2




  • The Dynamics of Corporate Governance and Sustainability: A Study of the Indian Electricity Generation Industry

Abstract Views: 290  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Ashok Kumar Sar
KIIT School of Management, KIIT University, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India

Abstract


This paper aims to reflect on the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability. Specifically, it aims to gain insights into the relationship between board structure, disclosure, related party transactions, shareholder rights, and board procedure and sustainability performance - economic performance, environmental performance and social equity performance - for the companies in the Indian Electricity Generating Industry. For the study, 286 companies from among the 402 companies listed in CMIE - PROWESS database for the industry were targeted. Although the aim was to take data from all 402 companies, complete data on the directors were available for only 286 companies from the Registrar of Companies. The study covers detailed analysis of corporate governance in these companies based on established theory and the structure of sustainability established. In the end, the positive relationships are summarised and implications for theory are discussed.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Sustainability, Environment, Economic Performance, Social Equity.

References