Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Negotiating Unethical Business Practices: Consumers in Urban Housing Market


Affiliations
1 Department of Sociology, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Presumably, a 'consumer' suffers most when the market is speculative, exploitative, non-transparent and operates with no authority to regulate the market irregularities. The urban housing market in India is a case in point. The present paper, which forms part of a larger empirical study, suggests that the consumers in urban housing market frequent a series of tricky practices, termed as "critical issues", which are neither avoidable nor acceptable to them.The number of 'registered disputes' do not actually reveal the magnitude of close encounters with such issues as these do not always mature as 'dispute' requiring formal institutional intervention. Response of the consumers to 'critical issues' is not uniform. Individual difference in response is influenced by one's affordability of damage/loss caused by deception and/or, one's own assessment of self to withstand the probable 'costs' associated with resolution through formal dispute redressal mechanism. Chronic shortage of urban housing (that increases the chances of speculation), limited success of the state to ensure rigid enforcement of rules to contain deception, inadequate concern of the market for consumer justice and ignorance/reluctance of the consumers to 'contest' allow unethical practices in urban housing market to perpetuate. A set of strategies has been prescribed.

Keywords

Consumer, Consumerism, Critical Issues, Real Estate.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bana, R. (2006). Housing and Consumer, Monograph, Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi CPA. (1986). The Consumer Protection Act, Retrieved from www.ncdrc.nic.in/1_1.html
  • Crisil (2010). India Real Estate Overview, Crisil Research. Retrieved fromwww.crisil.com/pdf/capitamarket/industrycontent. pdf
  • CUTS (2012). State of the Indian Consumer 2012, Centre for Consumer Action, Research and Training (CART), www.CUTS-International.org/CART/consumersup/pdf/Report_state_of_the_Indian_consumer-2012pdf
  • Dittrich, C. (2007). Bangalore: Globalisation and Fragmentation in India's Hightech-Capital.ASIEN 103. EY-FICCI. (2012). Bribery and Corruption: Ground Reality in India, FICCI, Ernst & Young
  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the City". New Left Review, 53, 23-40.
  • Indian Express. (2013). Akrama-Sakrama Bill comes in to force.
  • Kapoor, S. (---). Consumer and the Market, Monograph, Center for Consumer Studies, Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi
  • KPMG, (2011). India Survey on Bribery and Corruption. Retrieved fromwww.kpmg.com/IN/en/services/…/Bribery_Survey_Report_Final.pdf
  • MHUPA. (2013). National Symposium on Affordable Housing. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. GOI, New Delhi
  • Naz, H. (2010). Price Control Policy of Allanddin Khalji: Achievement or Failure.Jhss, 1(2), 68-84
  • Patil, A. (2011). A study on consumer protection through maintenance of product safety and standard in India, Working Paper Series No: 23, Asian Law Institute, National University of Singapore, www.law.nus.edu.sg.asli/pdf/WPS023.pdf
  • Prasad, A. R. (2008). Historical evolution of consumer protection and law in India. Journal of Texas Consumer Law, www.jtexconsumerlaw.com/v11n3/jccl_india.pdf
  • Real Estate. (2012). Report of the Committee on National Competition Policy. Ministry of Corporate Affairs, GOI Rangarajan, L. N. (2010). Kantilya: The Arthashastra, Digital Edition, Penguin, New Delhi.
  • Singh, S. S., & Chadah, S. (2005).Consumer protection in India: Some reflections. Monograph, Center for Consumer Studies, Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.
  • Smith, N. (2003). The Urban Revolution, Lefebvre, Henri (2003), Translated by Robert Bononno, University of Minnesota Press, London, pp.7-23

Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 2




  • Negotiating Unethical Business Practices: Consumers in Urban Housing Market

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Asish Mukhopadhyay
Department of Sociology, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Presumably, a 'consumer' suffers most when the market is speculative, exploitative, non-transparent and operates with no authority to regulate the market irregularities. The urban housing market in India is a case in point. The present paper, which forms part of a larger empirical study, suggests that the consumers in urban housing market frequent a series of tricky practices, termed as "critical issues", which are neither avoidable nor acceptable to them.The number of 'registered disputes' do not actually reveal the magnitude of close encounters with such issues as these do not always mature as 'dispute' requiring formal institutional intervention. Response of the consumers to 'critical issues' is not uniform. Individual difference in response is influenced by one's affordability of damage/loss caused by deception and/or, one's own assessment of self to withstand the probable 'costs' associated with resolution through formal dispute redressal mechanism. Chronic shortage of urban housing (that increases the chances of speculation), limited success of the state to ensure rigid enforcement of rules to contain deception, inadequate concern of the market for consumer justice and ignorance/reluctance of the consumers to 'contest' allow unethical practices in urban housing market to perpetuate. A set of strategies has been prescribed.

Keywords


Consumer, Consumerism, Critical Issues, Real Estate.

References