Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Volatility Interactions Across Indian and Chinese Stock Markets
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Volatility is an important component in risk return analysis of financial assets. It imparts liquidity to the financial system and also serves as an information source for rational decision making. Since the latter half of the 20th century, volatility in stock returns has been found to be time varying and exhibiting patterns and therefore, various models have been developed to capture such dynamic properties of volatility. The introduction of Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) models by Engle in 1982 has led to a better understanding of the behaviour of stock market volatility than the traditional measures including standard deviation. The present study attempts to model various aspects including clustering, leverage effect and spillover effect of stock market volatility in Indian and Chinese stock markets during 2001-2016 using daily time-series data with Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models. Volatility has been seen to be highly persistent in both the markets. The T-GARCH model has been applied in order to assess the presence of information asymmetry that bad news impacts volatility more than good news. Our results reveal that both Indian and Chinese stock markets’ volatility shows time varying behaviour. The theoretical reasoning of the asymmetric impact of news that bad news affects volatility more than good news has been confirmed in both markets. Furthermore, the spillover effect of volatility across the two markets has been tested using the T-GARCH-X model. The results show unidirectional spillover effect of volatility from Chinese stock market to the Indian stock market. This implies that shocks from Chinese stock market impact conditional volatility in the Indian stock markets only but not vice-versa.
Keywords
T-GARCH, Leverage Effect, Spillover, Volatility Clustering.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Apergis, N. (1998). Stock market volatility and deviations from macroeconomic fundamentals: Evidence from GARCH and GARCH-X models. Kredit und Kapital, (31), 400-412.
- Banumathy, K., & Azhagaiah, R. (2015). Risk-return dynamics: Evidence from the energy and utilities sector in India. Aestimatio, (11), 106.
- Black, F. (1976). Studies in stock price volatility changes of the nominal excess return on stocks, Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 177-181.
- Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, (31), 307-327.
- Bhar, R., & Nikolova, B. (2007). Analysis of mean and volatility spillovers using BRIC countries, regional and world equity index returns. Journal of Economic Integration, 369-381.
- Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambrige, Cambrige University.
- Christie, A. A., (1982). The stochastic behavior of common stock variances. Journal of Financial Economics, (10), 407-432.
- Cont, R. (2007). Volatility clustering in financial markets: Empirical facts and agent-based models. In Long memory in economics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 289-309.
- Demetrescu, M. (2007). Volatility clustering in high-frequency data: A self-fulfilling prophecy? Economics Bulletin, 7(15), 1-8.
- Dutta, A. (2014). Modelling volatility: symmetric or asymmetric GARCH models? Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Applications, 12(2), 99-108.
- Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, (50), 987-1008.
- Gaunersdorfer, A., & Hommes, C. (2007). A nonlinear structural model for volatility clustering. In Long memory in economics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 265-288.
- Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, (48), 1779-1801.
- Goudarzi, H., & Ramanarayanan, C. S. (2011). Modeling asymmetric volatility in the Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 221-231.
- Gogia, A. (2012). Is the Leverage Effect Caused by Leverage?. Industrial Economics and Technology Management.
- Gupta, R. K. (2014). Analysis of daily returns to monitor volatility changes on the Bombay bourse. Apeejay Journal of Management and Technology, 9(1).
- Jebran, K., & Iqbal, A. (2016). Examining volatility spillover between Asian countries’ stock markets. China Finance and Economic Review, 4(1) 6.
- Mandelbrot, B. (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, (36) 394-419.
- Mishra, B., & Rahman, M. (2010). Dynamics of stock market return volatility: Evidence from the daily data of India and Japan. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(5) 79.
- Mukherjee, K. N., & Mishra, R. K. (2010). Stock market integration and volatility spillover: India and its major Asian counterparts. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(2), 235-251.
- Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, (59), 347-370.
- Schmitt, N., & Westerhoff, F. (2016). Herding behavior and volatility clustering in financial markets. BERG Working Paper Series (107).
- Schwert, G. W. (1990). Stock market volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 23-34.
- Sood, V., & Saluja, H. S. (2006). Unfolding volatility and leverage effect: A comparison of S&P BSE SENSEX and NIFTY50. Apeejay Journal of Management and Technology, 11(1).
- Singh, P., Kumar, B., & Pandey, A. (2008). Price and volatility spillovers across North American, European and Asian stock markets: With special focus on Indian stock market. Working Paper IIM Ahmedabad.
- Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and control, 18(5), 931-955.
Abstract Views: 306
PDF Views: 0