Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dimensionality of the CAMELS Model - A Case Study of Indian Banks


Affiliations
1 Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The CAMELS model is one of the most extensively used approaches in bank performance assessment (Sahajwala & Van der Bergh, 2000). It is based on 6 ‘dimensions’: capital adequacy, asset quality, management soundness, earnings potential, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. However, the dimensionality of the CAMELS model has never been empirically examined in literature. The present study analyses the dimensionality of the CAMELS model using exploratory factor analysis. The study was performed using a sample of 19 public sector banks and 17 private sector banks operating in India, over the study period 2007-2011, a period of financial crisis and turbulence, prior to the adoption of the Basel III norms. The results of the study suggest that the CAMELS framework should be reorganised, with the same underlying variables, grouped through factor analysis, and prioritised by variance explained. The model provides an explicit measurement of risk as a separate dimension of bank performance. The results of the study also suggest that liquidity, earnings performance, and risk are closely related to one another, with significant negative impact on each other.

Keywords

CAMELS Model, Dimensionality, Exploratory Factor Analysis.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Altman, I. E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
  • Barr, R., Killgo, K. A., Siems, T. F., & Zimmel, S. (2002). Evaluating the productive efficiency and performance of U.S. commercial banks. Managerial Finance, 28(8), 3-25.
  • Beaver, W. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 71-111.
  • Beaver, W. (1968). Market prices, financial ratios and prediction of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 179-192.
  • Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2011). Macro-prudential monitoring of financial crisis: An empirical framework. In M. Chatterji, D. Gopal & S. Singh (Eds.), Governance, Development and Conflict (Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development (vol. 18, pp. 71-121). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Dash, M., & Das, A. (2013). Performance appraisal of Indian banks using CAMELS rating. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 12(2).
  • Hsiao, S.-H. (2008). Financial risk management of life insurers by CAMELS rating. Journal of Global Business Management, 4(1).
  • Hsiao, S.-H. (2006). A study of investment performance and overall financial performance for life insurers in Taiwan. Working Paper, Rutgers. Retrieved from http://centerforpbbefr.rutgers.edu/2006/Paper%202006/03AS-077-Shu-Hua%20Hsiao.pdf
  • Klomp, J., & de Haan, J. (2011). Banking risk and regulation: Does one size fit all? DNB Working Paper No. 323. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=197723
  • Maliszewski, K. (2009). Measuring stability of the polish financial system by means of a synthetic index. Presented at the 12th International Conference on Finance and Banking, held on Oct. 28-29, 2009, Organised by Silesian University in Opava.
  • Njoku, J. (2011). Anatomic assessment of CAMEL in Nigerian banking. International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2(1), 76-99.
  • Njoku, J., & Inanga, E. L. (2012). Underlying nature of the 2008-2009 banking crises. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 1(2), 190-208.
  • Popovska, J. (2014). Modelling financial stability: The case of the banking sector in Macedonia. Journal of Applied Economics and Business, 2(1), 68-91.
  • Sahajwala, R., & van der Bergh, P. (2000). Supervisory risk assessment and early warning systems. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Papers, No. 4, Bank of International Settlements.
  • Yakob, R., Yusop, Z., Radam, A., & Ismail, N. (2012). CAMEL rating approach to assess the insurance operators financial strength. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 46(2), 3-15.

Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 0




  • Dimensionality of the CAMELS Model - A Case Study of Indian Banks

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mihir Dash
Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract


The CAMELS model is one of the most extensively used approaches in bank performance assessment (Sahajwala & Van der Bergh, 2000). It is based on 6 ‘dimensions’: capital adequacy, asset quality, management soundness, earnings potential, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. However, the dimensionality of the CAMELS model has never been empirically examined in literature. The present study analyses the dimensionality of the CAMELS model using exploratory factor analysis. The study was performed using a sample of 19 public sector banks and 17 private sector banks operating in India, over the study period 2007-2011, a period of financial crisis and turbulence, prior to the adoption of the Basel III norms. The results of the study suggest that the CAMELS framework should be reorganised, with the same underlying variables, grouped through factor analysis, and prioritised by variance explained. The model provides an explicit measurement of risk as a separate dimension of bank performance. The results of the study also suggest that liquidity, earnings performance, and risk are closely related to one another, with significant negative impact on each other.

Keywords


CAMELS Model, Dimensionality, Exploratory Factor Analysis.

References