International Journal of Banking, Risk and Insurance

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Bank Performance in India: a Study Based on Camel Framework


Affiliations
1 Vivekananda Degree College, Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore., India
2 PESITM, Shimoga., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The banking system in India is significantly different from that of other Asian nations because of the country's unique geographic, social, and economic characteristics. India has a large population and land size, a diverse culture, and extreme disparities in income, which are marked among its regions. There are high levels of illiteracy among a large percentage of its population but, at the same time, the country has a large reservoir of managerial and technologically advanced talent.

In this article, an attempt has been made to rank the various commercial banks operating in India. The banks in India have been categorized into Public sector, Private sector, and Foreign banks. For the purpose of profitability analysis, 26 Public Sector, 18 Private Sector, and 15 Foreign banks have been taken into consideration. For the purpose of ranking, CAMEL analysis technique has been used. Each parameter of CAMEL-Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earning Quality, and Liquidity has been evaluated.

This research paper was carried out to find the adequacy of CAMEL in capturing the overall performance of a bank. In addition, the best ratios in each of the factors in CAMEL were identified and tested for the significance between Public sector, Private sector, and Foreign banks.


Keywords

Banking Performance, CAMEL, Profitability Analysis
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agarwal, P. K., & Sinha, S. K. (2010). Financial Performance of Microfi nance Institutions of India. Delhi Business Review, 11(2), pp. 37-46.

  • Altman, I. E. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, September, 23(4), pp. 589-609. New York University.

  • Eccher, E. A., Ramesh, K., & Thiagarajan, S. R. (1996). Fair Value Disclosures by Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1), pp. 79-117.

  • Elliott, J. A., Douglas, H. L. J., & Shaw, W. H. (1991). The Evaluation by the Financial Markets of Changes in Bank Loan Loss Reserve Levels. The Accounting Review, 66(4), pp. 847-861.

  • Lane, W. R., Looney, S. W., & Wansley, J. W. (1986). An Application of the Cox Proportional Hazards Model to Bank Failure. Journal of Banking and Finance, 10(4), pp. 511-531.

  • Looney, S. W., Wansley, J. W., & Lane, W. R. (1989). An Examination of Misclassifi cations with Bank Failure Prediction Models. Journal of Economics and Business, 41(4), pp. 327-336.

  • Maishanu, M. M. (2004). A Universal Approach to Predicting failure in the Commercial Banking Sub-Sector. Nigerian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1).

  • Piyu, Y. (1992). Data Envelopment Analysis & Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Application to Missouri Banks. Austin: IC2 Institute, University of Texas.

  • Siems, T. F. & Barr, R. S. (1998). Benchmarking the Productive Effi ciency of U.S. Banks: Financial Industry Studies. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

  • Sathye, M. (2001). Effi ciency of Banks in a Developing Economy. School of Accounting and Finance, University of Canberra.

  • Thomas, F. S., & Barr, R. S. (1998). Benchmarking the Productive Effi ciency of U.S. Banks: Financial Industry Studies. United States: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

  • Wirnkar A. D., & Tanko, M. (2007). A Post Consolidation Appraisal of Commercial Banks Effi ciency in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Accounting Research. Zaria: Department of Accounting, Ahmadu Bello University


Abstract Views: 778

PDF Views: 6




  • Bank Performance in India: a Study Based on Camel Framework

Abstract Views: 778  |  PDF Views: 6

Authors

B.N. Channaveere Gowda
Vivekananda Degree College, Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore., India
M.B. Anand
PESITM, Shimoga., India
D.C. Arun Kumar
PESITM, Shimoga., India

Abstract


The banking system in India is significantly different from that of other Asian nations because of the country's unique geographic, social, and economic characteristics. India has a large population and land size, a diverse culture, and extreme disparities in income, which are marked among its regions. There are high levels of illiteracy among a large percentage of its population but, at the same time, the country has a large reservoir of managerial and technologically advanced talent.

In this article, an attempt has been made to rank the various commercial banks operating in India. The banks in India have been categorized into Public sector, Private sector, and Foreign banks. For the purpose of profitability analysis, 26 Public Sector, 18 Private Sector, and 15 Foreign banks have been taken into consideration. For the purpose of ranking, CAMEL analysis technique has been used. Each parameter of CAMEL-Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earning Quality, and Liquidity has been evaluated.

This research paper was carried out to find the adequacy of CAMEL in capturing the overall performance of a bank. In addition, the best ratios in each of the factors in CAMEL were identified and tested for the significance between Public sector, Private sector, and Foreign banks.


Keywords


Banking Performance, CAMEL, Profitability Analysis

References