A Metric Method of Sex Determination of Femur and its Fragments
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Objective: The present study was done with an aim to find out the important measurements that will significantly differentiate the sex of femur and its fragments.
Materials and Method: For the study 100 femora, 70 of unknown sex and 30 (15 male, 15 female) of known sex were obtained from the Department of Anatomy of BLDEA'S Shri B.M.Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Bijapur, and 13 parameters were studied.
Result: After obtaining the measurements for each femur, statistical analysis was done using three steps of analysis. It was found that the value of maximum length, vertical diameter and anteroposterior diameter of head were important parameters for sex determination in femur.
Conclusion: Femur obtained as whole is more useful for sex assessment, but if found in fragments, upper end is more determinative of its sex.
Keywords
- Krogman WM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield (IL): Thomas; 1962.
- Trancho G.J, Robledo B, Lopez-Bueis I, Sanchez A. Sexual determination of femur using discriminant function analysis of a Spanish population of known age and sex. J. Forensic Sci. 1997; 42: 181-185.
- Armitage P. Statiscal methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell; 1881. p. 332-335.
- Knight B. Forensic pathology. Great Britain: Edward Arnold; 1991. p. 101-102.
- Purkait R and Chandra H. Sexual Dimorphism in Femora: An Indian Study. Forensic Science Communications. 2002; 4(3): 1-6.
- Leelavathy N, Rajangam S, Janakiram S, Thomas IM. Sexing of the femora. J Anat Soc India. 2000; 549(1):17-20.
- Pankaj G, Anterpreet K A, Shashi M, Baljit K, Navpreet K, Sonney S K. Significance of Weight and Maximum Length as an Objective for Sexing of Unknown Femora A Research Study in Punjab. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 32 (1): 25-27.
- Monson JW, Felts WJC. Transplantation studies of factors in skeletal organogenesis. Am J Phys Anthrop 1961; 19:63-77.
- Kate BR. The Ceylonese femur and its comparison with Indian and other Asian femur. J Anat Soc India 1976; 25(3)124-126.
- Ruff CB. Biomechanics of the hip and birth in early Homo. Am J Phys Anthrop 1995; 98:527- 574.
- Wescott DJ. Population variation in femur subtraochanteric shape. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50(2): 286- 293.
- Nakahashi T, Nagai M. Sex assessment of fragmentary skeletal remains. J Anthrop Soc Nippon. 1986; 94(3):289-309.
- GargiS, UshaD, SudhaC. Determination of sex from femur: discriminant analysis. J. Anat. Soc. India.2010; 59(2): 216-221.
- Pandya AM, Gupta BD, Singel TC, Patel MP. A Study of Sexual Dimorphism of Femoral Head in Gujarat Region. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2012; 34 (1): 20- 23.
- Purkait R, Chandra H. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2004; 146: 25-33.
- Dittrick J, Suchey JM. Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeleton remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus, American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1986; 70: 3-9.
Abstract Views: 586
PDF Views: 0