Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Polish and Indian Model of Social Economy:Comparative Analysis


Affiliations
1 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
 

Objective: To make a comparative analysis of the Polish and Indian model of social economy and to answer the question about sources of developmental dynamics of Indian social entrepreneurship. The Polish model of the social economy after dynamic development at the beginning of the 20th century was distorted during the communist period.

Methods/Findings: After 1989, Poland took over many solutions applied in the European Union, including the model of social economy. The European model of the social economy focuses on counteracting the exclusion of social groups that are neglected on the labor market, such as the disabled, the homeless, the unemployed and former prisoners. In India an original mix of spirituality has been existing, entrepreneurship and social commitment, creating a fertile ground for the development of the social economy sector.

Application: Indian social economy has made significant progress in recent years. It includes over 600,000 cooperative enterprises and 250 million users, making it the largest social economy in the world. These enterprises are active in promoting inclusive growth. Poland and India, despite large cultural differences, have also some common features. One of them is a large share of cooperative enterprises in the agricultural sector. 


Keywords

Social Economy, Social Entrepreneurship, Personalistic Entrepreneurship.
User
Notifications

  • M. Plonka. Social economy vs. Concepts of social policy. Polish model. Social Economy. 2015; 2, 85-100.
  • B. Roelants. How to define the social economy? In Prague first social economy conference preparatory dossier, Praha: CECOP. 2002.
  • J. Austin, H. Stevenson, J. Wei-Skillern. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 20006; 30, 1-22.
  • M. Yunus, K. Weber. Building Social Business: the New Kind of Capitalism that Serves Humanity’s most Pressing Needs, New York: Public Affairs. 2010; 256.
  • J. Defourny. From third sector to social enterprise. In C. Borzaga and J. Defourny (eds.). The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London and New York: Routledge. 2001; 1-18.
  • J. Mair, E. Noboa. Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, K. Hockerts (eds.), Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006; 121-135.
  • M. Podkowski. Działalność społeczno-gospodarcza ks. Wacława Blizińskiego w Liskowie (1900−1939). In M. Marszala, J. Przygodzki (eds.). Pro publico bono – idee i działalność, Wrocław. 2016; 135-146.
  • N. Taneja, A. Pstakia. Business for inclusive development: profiling the social business enterprise in India. In S. Mistra, D. Awasthi, G. Bathini. Eleventh. Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship. 2015; 2, 721-734.
  • R.B. Rangnath. Economici of Mahatma Gandhi. Indian Streams Research Journal. 2014; 4(8), 1-4.
  • S.K. Datta, M. Chakrabarti. Manager, entrepreneur and leader: a quest for possible convergence of functions in the promotion of social business. In S. Mistra, D. Awasthi, G. Bathini (eds.). Eleventh Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship. Ahmedabad: Book well. 2015; 2, 721-734.
  • N. Baporikar. Genesis and development of social entrepreneurship in India. In M. Khosrow-Pou (ed.), Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Hershey PA: IGI Global. 2017; 414-428.
  • B. Bombala. Entrepreneurship from the perspective of phenomenological praxeology. In S. Mistra, D. Awasthi, G. Bathini (eds.). Eleventh Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship. 2015; 1, 32-38.
  • R.S. Chauhan, R. Das. Entrepreneurship policy framework: understanding cultural and educational determinants for entrepreneurship. In M. Khosrow-Pou (ed.), Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Hershey PA: IGI Global. 2017; 138-170.

Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 126




  • Polish and Indian Model of Social Economy:Comparative Analysis

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 126

Authors

Bronislaw Bombala
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland

Abstract


Objective: To make a comparative analysis of the Polish and Indian model of social economy and to answer the question about sources of developmental dynamics of Indian social entrepreneurship. The Polish model of the social economy after dynamic development at the beginning of the 20th century was distorted during the communist period.

Methods/Findings: After 1989, Poland took over many solutions applied in the European Union, including the model of social economy. The European model of the social economy focuses on counteracting the exclusion of social groups that are neglected on the labor market, such as the disabled, the homeless, the unemployed and former prisoners. In India an original mix of spirituality has been existing, entrepreneurship and social commitment, creating a fertile ground for the development of the social economy sector.

Application: Indian social economy has made significant progress in recent years. It includes over 600,000 cooperative enterprises and 250 million users, making it the largest social economy in the world. These enterprises are active in promoting inclusive growth. Poland and India, despite large cultural differences, have also some common features. One of them is a large share of cooperative enterprises in the agricultural sector. 


Keywords


Social Economy, Social Entrepreneurship, Personalistic Entrepreneurship.

References