Indian Journal of Economics and Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Private Health Insurance on Lengths of Hospitalization and Healthcare Expenditure in India: Evidences from a Quasi-experiment Study


Affiliations
1 South Asia Network for Chronic Disease, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI),,C-1/52, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi –110 016, India
 

The health insurers administer retrospectively package rates for various inpatient procedures as a provider payment mechanism to empanelled hospitals in Indian healthcare market. This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization in terms of both lengths of hospitalization and per-day hospitalization expenditure in Indian healthcare market where package rates are retrospectively defined as healthcare provider payment mechanism. The claim records of 94443 insured individuals and the hospitalisation data of 32665 uninsured individuals were used. By applying stepwise and propensity score matching method, the sample of uninsured individual was matched with insured and 'average treatment effect on treated' (ATT) was estimated. Overall, the strategies of hospitals, insured and insurers for maximizing their utility were competing with each other. However, two aligning co-operative strategies between insurer and hospitals were significant with dominant role of hospitals. The hospitals maximize their utility by providing high cost healthcare in par with pre-defined package rates but align with the interest of insurers by reducing the number (length) of hospitalisation days. The empirical results show that private health insurance coverage leads to i) reduction in length of hospitalization, and ii) increase in per day hospital (health) expenditure. It is necessary to regulate and develop a competent healthcare market in the country with proper monitoring mechanism on healthcare utilization and benchmarks for pricing and provision of healthcare services.

Keywords

Health Insurance, Healthcare, India
User
Notifications

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). “The market for” lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism.” The quarterly journal of economics: 488-500.

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). “Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care.” The American economic review 53(5): 941-973.

  • Barnum, H., J. Kutzin, et al. (1995). “Incentives and provider payment methods.” The International journal of health planning and management 10(1): 23-45.

  • Cochran, W. G. and D. B. Rubin (1973). “Controlling bias in observational studies: A review.” SankhyÄ: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A: 417-446.

  • Iacus, S. M., G. King, et al (2009). “Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching.” Political analysis.

  • Imbens, G. M. and J. M. Wooldridge (2008). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • IRDA (2009). “Healthinsurance Statistics, Govt of India.”

  • Lave, J. R. and R. G. Frank (1990). “Effect of the structure of hospital payment on length of stay.” Health services research 25(2): 327.

  • Maceira, D. and P. f. H. Reform (1998). Provider payment mechanisms in healthcare: Incentives, outcomes, and organizational impact in developing countries, Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates.

  • NSSO (2006). “Morbidity Healthcare and the Condition of Aged.” Report No. 507. National Sample Survey Organisation, New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Im plementation, Government of India.

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. and D. B. Rubin (1983). “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.” Biometrika 70(1): 41-55.

  • Roy, A. D. (1951). “Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings.” Oxford economic papers 3(2): 135-146.

  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.” Journal of educational Psychology 66(5): 688.

  • Rubin, D. B. (1980). “Bias reduction using Mahalanobismetric matching.” Biometrics: 293-298.

  • Saltman, R. B. and J. Figueras (1997). European healthcare reform: analysis of current strategies, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.

  • Swartz, K. and T. A. Brennan (1996). “Integrated healthcare, capitated payment, and quality: the role of regulation.” Annals of internal medicine 124(4): 442.

  • Winship, C. and S. L. Morgan (1999). “The estimation of causal effects from observational data.” Annual review of sociology: 659-706.

  • Wouters, A., S. Bennett, et al. (1998). Alternative provider payment methods: incentives for improving healthcare delivery, PHR.


Abstract Views: 446

PDF Views: 228




  • Impact of Private Health Insurance on Lengths of Hospitalization and Healthcare Expenditure in India: Evidences from a Quasi-experiment Study

Abstract Views: 446  |  PDF Views: 228

Authors

Sukumar Vellakkal
South Asia Network for Chronic Disease, Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI),,C-1/52, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi –110 016, India

Abstract


The health insurers administer retrospectively package rates for various inpatient procedures as a provider payment mechanism to empanelled hospitals in Indian healthcare market. This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization in terms of both lengths of hospitalization and per-day hospitalization expenditure in Indian healthcare market where package rates are retrospectively defined as healthcare provider payment mechanism. The claim records of 94443 insured individuals and the hospitalisation data of 32665 uninsured individuals were used. By applying stepwise and propensity score matching method, the sample of uninsured individual was matched with insured and 'average treatment effect on treated' (ATT) was estimated. Overall, the strategies of hospitals, insured and insurers for maximizing their utility were competing with each other. However, two aligning co-operative strategies between insurer and hospitals were significant with dominant role of hospitals. The hospitals maximize their utility by providing high cost healthcare in par with pre-defined package rates but align with the interest of insurers by reducing the number (length) of hospitalisation days. The empirical results show that private health insurance coverage leads to i) reduction in length of hospitalization, and ii) increase in per day hospital (health) expenditure. It is necessary to regulate and develop a competent healthcare market in the country with proper monitoring mechanism on healthcare utilization and benchmarks for pricing and provision of healthcare services.

Keywords


Health Insurance, Healthcare, India

References