Indian Journal of Education and Information Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perception of Health-impacts of Environmental Noise in an Ambient Noise Context in Owerri-urban, Imo State, Nigeria


Affiliations
1 Department of Environmental Management Technology, Federal College of Land Resources Technology, Owerri
2 Department of Environmental Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
3 Department of Project Management Technology, University of Technology, Owerri
 

This paper reports the results of the investigation, of health impacts of environmental noise context in Owerri-urban, due to incessant complaints of urban dwellers of noise pollution and their effects on the health. This was measured by the use of 210 questionnaires on urban dwellers along the major routes in which 30 questionnaires were randomly administered between sampled routes designated NP1- NP7. The observed results indicates, that the automobile has 32.3%, the church has 3.3%, the construction work has 19.5%, the market has 5.7%, industrial activities 9.0%, hawking 10%, and school 6.6%, with the automobile recording the highest response as the main source of environmental noise pollution and the church having the least response. For the perceived health problems caused by environmental noise, the results further show that Cardiovascular and Physiological effects constituted 20.5%, Hearing Impairment did 25.2%, Sleeplessness did 21.9%, mental health did 11.4%, annoyance did 6.6% and human performance did 14.2%, with hearing impairment ranking the highest and the lowest being annoyance. Environmental noise was at the peak between the hours of eight- 11 A.M constituting 49.1%. The hours between three-seven pm constitutes 39.5%, while <10pm has 11.4% indicating the noise pollution is less in the evening time of the day where people are indoor for rest. These call for best management practice like enforcement of pollution law, maintenance of vehicles and creation of awareness on health implications of environmental noise.

Keywords

Health-impacts, Environmental Noise, Ambient Noise
User
Notifications

  • Babisch, W Ising, H Gallacher, JE Sweetnam, PMPC (1999) Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk: The Caerphilly and Speedwell studies, third phase 10-year follow up. Archives of Environmental Health. 54: 210- 216.

  • Berglund B & Lindvall T (1995) Community Noise. Document prepared for the World Health Organization. Archives of the Center for Sensory Research, 2(1), 195.

  • Birgitta, B Thomas, L & Dietrich HS (1999) Guidelines for community noise: WHO document on the Guidelines for Community Noise is the outcome of the WHOexpert task force meeting held in London, United Kingdom.

  • Bradley JS (1978) Predictors of Adverse Human Responses to Traffic Noise. Proceedings of the ASTM Symposium on Community Noise, Kansas City. Pp.108- 123.

  • Bradley JS (1986) Predictors of Speech Intelligibility in Rooms. J. Acoustical Society of America. 80, 837-845.

  • Carter, NL & Hunyor SN (1991) A field study of traffic noise and cardiac arrythmia during sleep. In: Technical Papers: 4th Western Pacific Regional Acoustics Conference. pp. 165-172.

  • Carter, NL Ingham, P Tran, K Huynor SA (1994) A field study of the effects of traffic noise on heart rate and cardiac arrhythmia during sleep. J. Sound and Vibration. 169, 221-227.

  • Chakrabarty, D Santra SM (1997) A Status of road traffic noise in Calcutta metropolis, India. J. Acoustical Society of America. 101, 943-949.

  • Cohen S (1980). After effects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin. 88, 82-108.

  • Environmental Noise Pollution and its Control, Proceedings of Specialist Course, Institution of Engineers, Roorkee, India. 1992.

  • Evans GW & Lepore A (1993) Non-auditory effects of noise on children: A critical review. Children’s Environments. 10, 31-51.

  • Evans GW (1998) Motivational consequences of exposure to noise. In N.L. Carter and R.F.S. Job (eds.) Noise as a Public Health Problem (Noise Effects ’98). 1, 311-320.

  • Evans, GW Bullinger, M Zygge H (1998) Chronic noise exposure and physiological response: A prospective study of children living under environmental stress. Psychological Science. 9, 75- 77.

  • Faiz, A Sinha, K, Wals, M & Valma A (1990) Automotive air pollution: Issues and options for developing countries. WPS 492, World Bank, Washington, USA.

  • Fidell, S Barber, DS Schultz TJ (1991) Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise. J. Acoustical Society of America 89, 221-233.

  • Fidell, S Zearsons, K Zabachnick, T Howe, R Silvati, L Barber, DS (1995) Field study of noise- induced sleep disturbance. J. Acoustical Society of America. 98, 1025- 1033.

  • Griefahn, B Deppe, C Mehnert, P Moog, R Moehler, U Schuemer R (1998) What nighttimes are adequate to prevent noise effects on sleep? In N.L. Carter and R.F.S. Job (eds.) Noise as a Public Health Problem (Noise Effects ’98). Vol. 2, pp. 445-450.

  • Griefahn, B Mehnert, P Moehler, P Schuemer-Kohrs, A Schuemer R (1996) Design of a field study on the effects of railway noise and road traffic noise. In F.A. Hill and R. Lawrence (eds.) Inter Noise 96. Noise Control – The Next 25 Years, Book 4, pp. 2183-88.

  • Griffiths ID (1983) Review of Community Response to Noise. In G. Rossi, (ed.), Noise as a Public Health Problem. 2, 1031-1047.

  • Haines, M Stansfeld, SA Job, RFS Berglund B (1998) Chroinic aircraft noise exposure and child cognitive performance and stress. In N.L. Carter and R.F.S. Job (eds.) Noise as a Public Health Problem (Noise Effects ’98). 1,329-336.

  • Hajah RI (2004). Guidelines for Environmental Noise Limits and Control, Noise Labeling and Emission Limits of Outdoor Sources and Vibration Limits and Control. Department of Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.

  • Hall, FL Birnie, SE Taylor, SM Palmer JE (1981). Direct Comparison of Community Response to Road Traffic Noise and to Aircraft Noise. J.Acoustical Society of America 70, 1690-1698.

  • Halpern D (1995) Mental Health and the Built Environment. More than Bricks and Mortar? Taylor and Francis Ltd, London, UK.

  • HCN (1994) Noise and Health. Publication No. 1994/15E, Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, Netherlands, 1994.

  • Hobson JA (1989) Sleep. Scientific American Library, W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, NY, USA.

  • Hygge S Jones, DM Smith, AP (1998) Recent developments in noise and performance. In N.L. Carter and R.F.S. Job (eds.) Noise as a Public Health Problem (Noise Effects ’98). 1, 321-28.

  • ISO (1999) Acoustics–Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise- induced hearing impairment. International Standard ISO 1999, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Job RFS (1990) Psychological factors of community reaction to noise. In M. Vallet (ed.) Noise as a Public Health Problem. l, 48-59.

  • Koelega HS (1987) (ed.) Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement, and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Lindvall T & Radford E (1973) Measurement of annoyance due to exposure to environmental factors. Environmental Res. 96, 1-36.

  • Miedema HME & Vos H (1998) Exposure response functions for transportation noise. J. Acoustical Society of America. 104, 3432-3445.

  • Miedema HME (1993) Response Functions for Environmental Noise. In M. Vallet (ed.) Noise as a Public Health Problem, 3, 428-433.

  • Öhrström E (1988) Research on noise and sleep since Present state. In M. Vallet (ed.), Noise as a Public Health Problem, 3, 331-338.

  • Passchier-Vermeer W (1993) Noise and Health. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands. Publication No A93/02E, review prepared by TNO Institute of Preventive Health Care, Leiden.

  • Pearsons K (1998) Awakening and motility effects of aircraft noise. In N.L. Carter and R.F.S. Job (eds.) Noise as a Public Health Problem (Noise Effects ’98). 2, 427- 32.

  • Persson K & Björkman M (1988) Annoyance due to Low Frequency Noise and the Use of the dBA Scale. J. Sound and Vibration.127, 491-497.

  • Rao PA (1998) Noise Pollution and Control, Encyclopedia of Environmental Pollution and Control, Vol 2, Environmedia Publications, India, 1998.

  • Sandberg U (1999) Abatement of traffic, vehicle and tire/road noise – the global perspective. In: J. Cuschieri, S. Glegg, Yan Yong (eds.) Internoise 99 – The 1999 International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 37-42.

  • Stansfeld, S Gallacher, J Babisch, W Shipley S (1996). Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: prospective findings from the Caerphilly Study. British Medical Journal. 313, 266-267.

  • Zaidi SH (1998) Current status and future trends of deafness and hearing impairment in the tropics. Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology. 14, 38-45.

  • Zaidi SH (1999) An epidemiological study of hearing impairment in the Himalayan territories of Pakistan. Hearing International Newsletter. 8, 1-4.


Abstract Views: 353

PDF Views: 0




  • Perception of Health-impacts of Environmental Noise in an Ambient Noise Context in Owerri-urban, Imo State, Nigeria

Abstract Views: 353  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

E. A. Ubuoh
Department of Environmental Management Technology, Federal College of Land Resources Technology, Owerri
S. M. O. Akhionbare
Department of Environmental Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
O. A. Onifade
Department of Environmental Management Technology, Federal College of Land Resources Technology, Owerri
S. I Ogbuji
Department of Project Management Technology, University of Technology, Owerri

Abstract


This paper reports the results of the investigation, of health impacts of environmental noise context in Owerri-urban, due to incessant complaints of urban dwellers of noise pollution and their effects on the health. This was measured by the use of 210 questionnaires on urban dwellers along the major routes in which 30 questionnaires were randomly administered between sampled routes designated NP1- NP7. The observed results indicates, that the automobile has 32.3%, the church has 3.3%, the construction work has 19.5%, the market has 5.7%, industrial activities 9.0%, hawking 10%, and school 6.6%, with the automobile recording the highest response as the main source of environmental noise pollution and the church having the least response. For the perceived health problems caused by environmental noise, the results further show that Cardiovascular and Physiological effects constituted 20.5%, Hearing Impairment did 25.2%, Sleeplessness did 21.9%, mental health did 11.4%, annoyance did 6.6% and human performance did 14.2%, with hearing impairment ranking the highest and the lowest being annoyance. Environmental noise was at the peak between the hours of eight- 11 A.M constituting 49.1%. The hours between three-seven pm constitutes 39.5%, while <10pm has 11.4% indicating the noise pollution is less in the evening time of the day where people are indoor for rest. These call for best management practice like enforcement of pollution law, maintenance of vehicles and creation of awareness on health implications of environmental noise.

Keywords


Health-impacts, Environmental Noise, Ambient Noise

References