International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Investigation of the Impact of Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism on Agency Cost in Tehran Stock Exchange


Affiliations
1 Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran, Islamic Republic of
3 Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between conservatism and agency costs in firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). To do so, a sample of 588 firms is selected as research sample for the period of 2004-2010 and fixed effect regression model is used to test hypotheses. C- scoreij index is used to measure unconditional conservatism and Ball and Shivakumar (2005) model to measure conditional conservatism. Multiplying Tobin's Q by free cash flow is considered a proxy for agency cost as independent variable. The results show that conditional conservatism has a negative and significant impact on agency cost while unconditional conservatism has a positive and significant impact.

Keywords

Conditional Conservatism, Unconditional Conservatism, Agency Costs
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahmeda, A. S. & Duellman, S. (2011). Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions. Accounting and Finance, 51(3), 609-633.

  • Ball, R. & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.

  • Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(1), 3-37.

  • Beaver, W. H. & Ryan, S. G. (2005). Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3), 269-309.

  • Chi, W. & Wang, C. (2010). Accounting conservatism in a setting of Information Asymmetry between majority and minority shareholders. The International Journal of Accounting, 45(4), 465-489.AR

  • Doukas, J. A. & McKnight, P. J. (2005). European momentum strategies, information diffusion, and investor conservatism. Doi: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00286.

  • Gigler, F., Kanodia, C., Sapra, H. & Venugopalan, R. (2010). Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contract. Forthcoming Journal of Accounting Research. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1378295 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00336.x

  • Givoly, D., Hayn, C. & Natarajan, A. (2007). Measuring reporting conservatism. The Accounting Review, 82(1), 65-106.

  • Grambovas, C. A., Giner, B. & Christodoulou, D. (2006). Earnings conservatism: Panel data evidence from the European Union and the United States. ABACUS, 42(3-4), 354-378. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00205.x 354.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986), Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-29.

  • Kim, B. H. & Pevzner, M. (2010). Conditional accounting conservatism and future negative surprises: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 311-329.

  • Iatridis, G. E. (2011). Accounting disclosures, accounting quality and conditional and unconditional conservatism. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20(2), 88-102.

  • Lehn, K. & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771-788.

  • Iyengar, R. J. & Zampelli, E. M. (2010). Does accounting conservatism pay? Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 121-142.

  • Vakili Fard, H. R., Nikoomaram, H., Jabbarzadeh Kangarluei, S. & Bayazidi, A. (2011). The investigation of the relationship between earnings management and conservatism in accounting system of Iran. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 853-860.

  • Watts, R. (2003). Conservatism in accounting Part I: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizon, 17(3), 207-221.

  • Watts, R. L. & Zuo, L. (2012). Accounting Conservatism and Firm Value: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis, MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4941-11. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1952722.

  • Young, K. K. (2005). Accounting Conservatism and Managerial Incentives Management Science, 51(11), 1626-1632.


Abstract Views: 328

PDF Views: 0




  • The Investigation of the Impact of Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism on Agency Cost in Tehran Stock Exchange

Abstract Views: 328  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Saeid Jabbarzadeh Kangarlouei
Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Nasib Agazadeh Soltan Ahmadi
Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Morteza Motavassel
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between conservatism and agency costs in firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). To do so, a sample of 588 firms is selected as research sample for the period of 2004-2010 and fixed effect regression model is used to test hypotheses. C- scoreij index is used to measure unconditional conservatism and Ball and Shivakumar (2005) model to measure conditional conservatism. Multiplying Tobin's Q by free cash flow is considered a proxy for agency cost as independent variable. The results show that conditional conservatism has a negative and significant impact on agency cost while unconditional conservatism has a positive and significant impact.

Keywords


Conditional Conservatism, Unconditional Conservatism, Agency Costs

References