Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Diet Composition and Feeding Behavior of Largehead Hairtail Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus 1758 along the Eastern Arabian Sea and Western Bay of Bengal


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka – 575 001, India
2 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530 003, India
3 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 028, India
4 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 061, India
5 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Veraval, Gujarat – 362 269, India
6 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mandapam, Tamil Nadu – 623 520, India
7 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Ernakulam, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018, India
 

Information on diet composition and feeding habits of species is very much essential for the scientific planning to develop sustainable management plans. The feeding biology of Trichiurus lepturus was studied during 2014 to 2018 from 6167 and 3346 specimens collected on a weekly basis along Eastern Arabian Sea (EAS) and Western Bay of Bengal (WBB), respectively. Crustaceans mainly represented Acetes spp. (98.6 %) and were categorized as dominant and preferred (%QI = 51.35; %IRI = 53.31) food item; teleosts were categorized as dominant and secondary (%QI = 47.46; %IRI = 45.71) food items and molluscs as accidental and accessory food items of T. lepturrus based on the values of dietary coefficient and Index of Relative Importance along the Eastern Arabian Sea (EAS) while, teleosts were completely dominant (%QI = 99.61; %IRI = 99.27) with both molluscs (%QI = 0.34; %IRI = 0.56) and crustaceans (%QI = 0.01; %IRI = 0.17) forming accessory and accidental food items along the Western Bay of Bengal (WBB). The teleostean prey items belonging to 23 genera were encountered in the guts of T. lepturus from EAS with Stolephorus spp. (17.09 %), Sardinella longiceps (6.65 %), Decapterus spp. (5.75 %), Rastrelliger kanagurta (1.36 %), and Megalaspis cordyla (0.89 %) as major component; whereas, in WBB, 16 genera of teleosts representing Sardinella longiceps (50 %), Stolephorus spp. (31.52 %), Decapterus spp. (4.57 %), and Rastrelliger kanagurta (2.26 %) formed the major portion of diet by %IRI. Crustaceans were dominated by Acetes spp. (52.61% IRI) in EAS, while other crustaceans’ contribution as prey item was negligible. However, along WBB, the crustaceans’ contribution as food components was very minimal. Molluscs did not contribute much as dietary constituents of T. lepturus in both EAS and WBB. About 50.15 % and 56.83 % of the stomachs had food content in various proportions in EAS and WBB, respectively and rest of the stomachs were empty.

Keywords

Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Food and Feeding, Ribbonfish, Stomach Fullness.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • James P S B R, Narasimham K A, Meenakshi Sundaram P T & Appanna Sastry Y, Present status of ribbonfishes of India, CMFRI Special Publication, 24, 1986, pp. 49.

  • Rajesh K M, Rohit P, Vinay Kumar V, Sampathkumar G & Karamathulla S P, Fishery, reproductive biology and stock status of the large head hairtail Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus, 1758 off Karnataka, south-west coast of India, Indian J Fish, 62 (2015) 28-34.

  • Elliot M, Whitfield A K, Potter I C, Blaber S J M, Cyrus D P, et al., The guild approach to categorising estuarine fish assemblages: a global review, Fish Fish, 8 (2007) 241-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00253.x

  • Al-Nahdi A, Al-Marzouqi A, Al-Rasadi E & Groeneveld J C, The size composition, reproductive biology, age and growth of large head cutlass fish Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus from the Arabian Sea coast of Oman, Indian J Fish, 56 (2009) 73-79.

  • Patadiya D S, Jawahar P, Mogalekar H S, Chandran S, Saroj J, et al., Ribbonfish Fisheries of India, J Aquac Trop, 32 (2017) 99-106.

  • Murua H & Saborido-Rey F, Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic, J Northwest Atl Fish Sci, 33 (2003) 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v33.a2

  • Thangavelu R, Anbarasu M, Zala M S, Koya K M, Sreenath K R, et al., Food and feeding habits of commercially important demersal finfishes off Veraval coast, Indian J Fish, 59 (2012) 77-87.

  • Oronsaye C G & Nakpodia F A, A comparative study of the food and feeding habits of Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus and Brycinus nurse in a tropical river, Pakistan J Sci Ind Res, 48 (2005) 118-121.

  • Rajesh K M, Rohit P, Viswambharan D, Abdussamad E M & Mridula Rajesh, Feeding behaviour of the sawtooth barracuda, Sphyraena putnamae (Jordan and Seale, 1905) along the southeastern Arabian Sea, India, Reg Stud Mar Sci, 47 (2021) 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101974

  • Yan Y, Gang H, Junlan C, Huosheng L & Xianshi J, Feeding ecology of hairtail Trichiurus margarites and large head hairtail Trichiurus lepturus in the Beibu Gulf, the South China Sea, Chinese J Oceanol Limnol, 29 (2011) 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-0004-z

  • Chiou W, Chen C, Wang C & Chen C, Food and feeding habits of ribbonfish Trichiurus lepturus in coastal waters of south-western Taiwan, Fish Sci, 72 (2006) 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01159.x

  • Mericas D, Feeding habits of the Atlantic cutlass fish Trichiurus lepturus, in the Gulf of Mexico, Northeast Gulf Sci, 4 (1981) 137-140. https://doi.org/10.18785/negs.0402.11

  • Zhang B, Feeding habits and ontogenetic diet shift of hairtail fish (Trichiurus lepturus) in east China Sea and Yellow Sea, Mar Fish Res, 25 (2004) 6-12.

  • Yousuf F & Tabassum S, Food and feeding habits of the cutlassfish Trichiurus lepturus (Linnaeus, 1758) from Karachi coast, Pakistan, Int J Biol and Biotech, 8 (2011) 413-418.

  • Yan Y, Chen J, Lu H, Hou G & Lai J, Feeding habits and ontogenetic diet shifts of hairtail, Trichiurus margarites in the Beibu Gulf of the south China Sea, Acta Ecol Sin, 32 (2012) 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-chnaes.2011.04.008

  • Di Beneditto A P M, What drives the cannibalism of Trichiurus lepturus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the coastal area of southeastern Brazil (21-22º S)?, Int J Fish Aquat Stud, 2 (2015) 363-365.

  • Ojelade O C, Omoniyi I T, Abdul W O, Adeosun F I, Idowu A A, et al., Reproductive Biology, Trophodynamics and Stock Structure of Ribbonfish (Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus, 1758) in Tropical Marine Waters of the Bight of Benin, J Fish Environ, 43 (2019) 43-56.

  • Koffi K M, Joanny T G T, Bodji M I & Ouattara N I, Diet and food ethology of largehead hairtail Trichiurus lepturus, 1758 (Perciformes, Trichiuridae) in coastal waters of Cote d’Ivoire, App Ecol Environ Sci, 8 (2020) 40-46. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-8-2-1

  • Ghosh S, Hanumantha Rao M V, Rohit P, Rammohan K & Maheshwarudu G, Reproductive biology, trophodynamics & stock structure of ribbonfish Trichiurus lepturus from northern Arabian Sea and northern Bay of Bengal, Indian J Geo-Mar Sci, 43 (2014) 755-771.

  • Rohit P, Rajesh K M, Sampathkumar G & Karamathulla S P, Food and feeding of the ribbonfish Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus, 1758 off Karnataka, south-west coast of India, Indian J Fish, 62 (2015) 58-63.

  • Koya M K, Vase V K, Pakatapada A A, Sreenath K R, Dash G, et al., Diet composition and feeding dynamics of Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus, 1758 off Gujarat, north-west coast of India, Indian J Fish, 65 (2018) 50–57. https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2018.65.269184-06

  • Fischer W & Bianchi G, FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Indian Ocean; fishing area, Vols 1–6, Prepared and printed with the support of the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA), (FAO, Rome), 1984.

  • Smith M M & Heemstra P C, Smith’s Sea fishes, (Southern Book Publications, Johannesburg), 1986, pp. 907.

  • Pinkas L, Oliphant M S & Iverson L K, Food habits of albacore, bluefintuna, and bonito in California waters, (State of California the resource agency department of fish and game), Fish Bulletin 152, 1971, pp. 1-105.

  • Rosecchi E & Nouaze Y, Comparison of five dietary indices used in the analysisof stomach contents, Revue des Travaux Institut des Peches Maritimes, 49 (1987) 111–123.

  • Salgado J P, Cabra H N & Costa M J, Feeding ecology of the gobies Pomatoschistus minutes (Pallas, 1770) and Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer, 1838) in the upper Tagus estuary, Portugal, Sci Mar, 68 (2004) 425-434. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2004.68n3425

  • Lee S, Food and feeding habits of ribbonfishes, Trichiurus japonicus and T. lepturus, Bull Inst Zool Acad Sin, 17 (1978) 117-124.

  • Jaiswar A K & Chakraborty K, Acetes, the preferred food of fishes along the northwest coast of India, Indian J Fish, 52 (2005) 215-219.

  • Vase V K, Koya M K, Dash G, Dash S, Sreenath K R, et al., Acetes as a keystone species in the fishery and trophic ecosystem along northeastern Arabian Sea, Thalassas, 37 (2021) 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00276-y

  • James P S B R, The ribbonfishes of the family Trichiuridae of India, Memoir No. 1, Marine Biological Association of India (MBAI), 1967, pp. 226.

  • Bakhoum S A, Diet overlap of immigrant narrow barred Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus commerson (Lac. 1802) and the large head hairtail ribbonfish Trichiurus lepturus (L. 1758) in the Egyptian Mediterranean coast, Anim Biodivers Conserv, 30 (2007) 147-160.

  • Schultz K, Ken Schultz’s field guide to saltwater fish, (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New Jersey), 2011, pp. 274.

  • Lin L, Yan L, Ling J, Liu Y & Zhou R, Food habits of hairtail in the East China Sea region, Mar Fish, 27 (2005) 187-192.

  • Liu Y, Cheng J & Chen Y, A spatial analysis of trophic composition: a case study of hairtail (Trichiurus japonicus) in the East China Sea, Hydrobiologia, 632 (2009) 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9829-2

  • Tanabe T, Feeding habit of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis and other tuna Thunnus spp. juveniles in the tropical western Pacific, Fish Sci, 67 (2001) 563-570. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00291.x

  • Koester F W & Moellmann C, Egg cannibalism in Baltic sprat Sprattus sprattus, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 196 (2000) 269-277. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps196269

  • Reuben S, Vijayakumaran K, Achayya P & Prabhakar V D, Biology and exploitation of Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus from Visakhapatnam waters, Indian J Fish, 44 (1997) 101-110.

  • Abdussamad E M, Nair P N R & Achayya P, The ribbonfish fishery and stock assessment of Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus off Kakinada, east coast of India, J Mar Biol Assoc India, 48 (2006) 41-45.

  • Juanes F & Conover D O, Rapid growth, high feeding rates and early piscivory in young of the year blue fish (Pomatomus saltatrix), Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 51 (1994) 1752-1761. https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-176

  • Rajesh K M, Rohit P, Mini K G, Sathyavathi T & Hakeem M M A, Seriolina nigrofasciata (Ruppel, 1829), its fishery and biological aspects off south-west coast of India, Indian J Fish, 66 (2019) 9–16. https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2019.66.1.82727-02

  • Sreenivasan P V, Observation on the food and feeding habits of the torpedo travelly, Megalaspis cordyla (Linnaeus) from Vizhinjam Bay, Indian J Fish, 21 (1974) 20-28.

  • Bapat S V, Deshmukh V M, Krishnamoorthi B, Muthiah C, Kagwade P V, et al., Fishery resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone of the north-west coast of India, Bull Central Mar Fish Res Inst, Kochi, 33 (1982) 1-81.

  • Thampi P R S, Meenakshi Sundaram P T, Basheeruddin S & Gnanamuthu J C, Spawning periodicity of the ribbonfish Trichiurus haumela (Forsskal), with a note on its growth, Indian J Fish, 15 (1968) 53-60.

  • Alam A, Chadha N K, Joshi K D, Chakraborty S K, Sawant P B, et al., Food and feeding ecology of the non-native Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the river Yamuna, India, Proc Natl Acad India Sect B Biol Sci, 85 (2015) 167–174. https://doi.10.1007/s40011-014-0338-3

  • Suyani N K, Mridula Rajesh & Rajesh K M, First report on the diet and reproductive biology of red-toothed triggerfish Odonus niger (Ruppell, 1836) from the southeastern Arabian Sea, J Mar Biol Assoc UK, 101 (2021) 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315421000771


Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 90




  • Diet Composition and Feeding Behavior of Largehead Hairtail Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus 1758 along the Eastern Arabian Sea and Western Bay of Bengal

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 90

Authors

K M Rajesh
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka – 575 001, India
P Rohit
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mangaluru, Karnataka – 575 001, India
S Ghosh
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530 003, India
M Muthurathinam
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 028, India
M Sivadas
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 028, India
C Anulekshmi
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 061, India
P A Azeez
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Veraval, Gujarat – 362 269, India
H M Manas
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530 003, India
R Vinothkumar
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Centre, Mandapam, Tamil Nadu – 623 520, India
A D Nakhawa
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Regional Station, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 061, India
E M Abdussamad
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Ernakulam, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018, India

Abstract


Information on diet composition and feeding habits of species is very much essential for the scientific planning to develop sustainable management plans. The feeding biology of Trichiurus lepturus was studied during 2014 to 2018 from 6167 and 3346 specimens collected on a weekly basis along Eastern Arabian Sea (EAS) and Western Bay of Bengal (WBB), respectively. Crustaceans mainly represented Acetes spp. (98.6 %) and were categorized as dominant and preferred (%QI = 51.35; %IRI = 53.31) food item; teleosts were categorized as dominant and secondary (%QI = 47.46; %IRI = 45.71) food items and molluscs as accidental and accessory food items of T. lepturrus based on the values of dietary coefficient and Index of Relative Importance along the Eastern Arabian Sea (EAS) while, teleosts were completely dominant (%QI = 99.61; %IRI = 99.27) with both molluscs (%QI = 0.34; %IRI = 0.56) and crustaceans (%QI = 0.01; %IRI = 0.17) forming accessory and accidental food items along the Western Bay of Bengal (WBB). The teleostean prey items belonging to 23 genera were encountered in the guts of T. lepturus from EAS with Stolephorus spp. (17.09 %), Sardinella longiceps (6.65 %), Decapterus spp. (5.75 %), Rastrelliger kanagurta (1.36 %), and Megalaspis cordyla (0.89 %) as major component; whereas, in WBB, 16 genera of teleosts representing Sardinella longiceps (50 %), Stolephorus spp. (31.52 %), Decapterus spp. (4.57 %), and Rastrelliger kanagurta (2.26 %) formed the major portion of diet by %IRI. Crustaceans were dominated by Acetes spp. (52.61% IRI) in EAS, while other crustaceans’ contribution as prey item was negligible. However, along WBB, the crustaceans’ contribution as food components was very minimal. Molluscs did not contribute much as dietary constituents of T. lepturus in both EAS and WBB. About 50.15 % and 56.83 % of the stomachs had food content in various proportions in EAS and WBB, respectively and rest of the stomachs were empty.

Keywords


Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Food and Feeding, Ribbonfish, Stomach Fullness.

References