Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Determinants of Age at Marriage:A Community Based Retrospective Report of Women in Manipur
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The purpose of this study is to examine various socio-economic and demographic factors affecting age at marriage among Manipuri women. For this purpose a cross sectional as well as community based study was conducted through cluster sampling in four districts of Manipur Imphal West, Imphal East, Thoubal and Bishnupur. The aim of this study is to identify factors affecting age at marriage among women in Manipur. Univariate, bivariate and logistic regression were employed to examine the relationship between age at marriage and selected background variables. The mean age at marriage is 22.19 years and nearly 16.7% of women are married before 18 years. The findings from logistics regressions indicate that among the six variables of interst, only three factors religion, educational level and age at menarche are the most important determinants of age at marriage in Manipur. The finding of this study may have some policy implication that would help the planners and policy makers of the government to take necessary steps in achieving female age at marriage as high as possible.
Keywords
Age at Marriage, Age at Menarche, Logistic Regression, Odd Ratio.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Anjali, H., & Dhruba, K. L. (2013). Socio-economic factors influence the age at first marriage of Muslim women of a remote population from North-East India. Antrocom Online Journal of Anthropology, 9(1), 75- 79.
- Bloom, B. E., & Reddy, P.H. (1986). Age pattern of women at marriage. Co-habitation and first birth in India.Demography,23(4),509-523.
- Bongaarts, J. (1983). The proximate determinants of natural maternal fertility. In R. A. Bulatao and RD. Lee (Eds.), Determinants offertility in developing countries (vol. 1. pp. 103-138).NewYork:AcademicPress.
- Caldwell, B.K. (2007). Factors affecting female age at marriage in South Asia. Asian Population Studies, 1 (3), 283-301.
- Das, N. P., & Dey, D. (1996). Female age at marriage in India: Trends and determinants. Demography India, 27(1), 91-115.
- Directorate of Economics & Statistics (2008). Population of Manipur 2006. Government of Manipur.
- Harwood-Lejune, A. (2001). Rising age at marriage and fertility in southern and Eastern Africa. European Joumal of Population, 17(3),26l-280.
- Hobcraft, J. N., McDonald, J., & Rutstein, S. O. (1984). Socioeconomic factors in infant and child mortality: A cross-national comparison. Population Studies, 38(2), 193-224.
- Hossain, M.M., & Islam, M.R. (2008). Factors affecting female age at marriage in a rural area of Charghat Thana of Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. Middle East Journal of Age and Ageing, 5(3), 15-19.
- Ikamari, L.D.E. (2005). The effect of education on the timing of marriage in Kenya. Demography Research,12(1), 1-28.
- Jejeebhoy, SJ. (1995). Womens education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Jensen, R, & Thornton, R (2003). Early female marriage in the developing world. In C. Sweetman(Ed.), In Gender, Development and Marriage. UK: OxfamGB, Oxford.
- Jones, G.W. (1992). Divorce in Islamic South-East Asia. Working Papers in Demography, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University. Canberra, pp. 36.
- Kirkwood, B.R., & Sterne, J.A.C. (2003). Essential Medical Statistics (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
- Mohammad, N.H. (2013). Regional differentials of age at first women in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 2(2), 76-83.
- Nahar, L., & Rahman, M. (2006). Changes in socio-economic differentials of age at marriage and first birth interval during 1983-1994 in Matlab, Bangladesh. Demography India,35(1), 1-14.
- Nahar, L., Rahman, M., & Van-Ginneken, J. K. (1998). The influence of first birth on marital dissolution among the couples of Matlab, Bangladesh. In XXI conference of Indian association for the study of population and international conference on population issues on the eve of 21st century,9-12 February l998.
- Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner (2001). Marital status and age at marriage-An analysis of 2001 Census data. New Delhi.
- Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner (2014). Sample registration system baseline survey. New Delhi.
- Palamuleni, M. (2011). Socioeconomic determinants of age at marriage in Malawi. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology,3(7),224-235.
- Quisumbing, A. R, & Hallman, K. (2003). Marriage in transition: Evidence on age, education, and assets from six developing countries. Policy Research Working paper No.183.Population Council.
- Rahman, M. (2005). Socio-economic differentials of female age at first marriage: A study of Chuadanga district, Bangladesh. Journal of Statistical Research of Iran, 2, 139-147.
- Sah, R.B., Subedi, L., Shah, U., & Jha, N. (2014). Factors affecting early age marriage in Morang District of Nepal. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 2(4),1320-1324.
- Singh, N.S., Narendra, R.K., & Hemochandra, L. (2007). Determinants of waiting time to conception (WTC) in Manipuri women. Kuwait MedicalJournal, 39(1), 39-43.
- Singh, N.S., Singh, N.S., & Narendra, R.K. (2011). Survival analysis of duration of waiting time to conception. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 4(2), 144-154.
- Singh, S., & Samara, R (1996). Early marriage among women in developing countries. International Family Planning Perspectives, 22, 148-157.
- Tiwari, H., Tiwari,R, & Oza, U.N. (2005). Age at menarche audits association with age at marriage and age at first birth. Indian JournaI of Community Medicine, 30(1), 1-2.
- Uchida, E., Araki, S., & Murata, K. (1993). Socioeconomic factors affecting marriage, divorce and birth rates in a Japanese population. Journal of Biosocial Science,25(4); 499-507.
- Zabin, L., & Kiragu, K. (1998). The health consequences of adolescent sexual and fertility behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies inFamily Planning 29(2),210-32.
Abstract Views: 513
PDF Views: 0