Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Bt. Cotton and Non Bt./Desi Cotton Growing on Socio-Economic Status of Farmers in Bhiwani District


Affiliations
1 Department of Soeiology, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) cotton is commonly grown in all over the world to control wide range of pests. The farmers benefited from BT cotton through increased yield revenue and gross margin. While the farmer maid savings on insecticide costs they had to spend more on seed and harvesting. The farmers made savings on insecticide costs they had to spend more on seed and harvesting. Farming households used the additional income mostly for investment in people (education)and physical resources (cotton & other crop production). This research paper conducts to assess the impact of Bt. cotton and Desi/non-Bt. cotton on socio-economic status of farmers. The study was conducted among 120 farmers in Bhiwani districts of Haryana State through survey method. The findings of the study elucidate that investment on education of children was reported increased by 83.33 per cent and 66.66 per cent of respondents growing Bt. cotton and desi cotton respectively. Expenditure on social ceremonies was felt increased by 70.83 per cent and 50 per cent of the respondents growing Bt. cotton and desi cotton/hybrids respectively.

Keywords

Bt. Cotton, Pests, Insecticide, Desi/Non-Bt. Cotton, Socio-Economic Status.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abhilash, P.C., & Singh, N. (2009). Pesticide use and application: an Indian Scenario. Journal of Hazard Mater, 765(1-3), 1-12.

  • Anonymous(2010).Potentials oftransgenic cotton expressing Bt on cotton IPM programmer. Proc. Belt wide Cotton Conferences, SanDiegoCa, USA, Memphis, USA.

  • Anonymous (2014a). Cotton recorder. International Cotton Advisory Committee, 13, 112. Washington D.C., USA.

  • Bag, D. (2000). Pesticides and health risks. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(38), 3381-3383.

  • Bennett, R., Kambhampati, U., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2006).Farm-level economic performance of genetically modifiedcotton in Maharashtra, India. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(1), 59-71.

  • Cotton Association of India (CAI) (2008). Cotton statistics and news (Issue 42). Mumbai, Maharashtra, India: Author.

  • Crost, B., Shankar, B., Bennett, R., & Morse, S. (2007). Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(1), 24-36.

  • James, C. (2007). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Briefs No. 37. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. Ithaca, NY.

  • James, C. (2013). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. International Service_for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), 6(2), 78-79.

  • Khadi,B.M.,Rao, M.R.K., & Singh, M. (2007). The Hindu survey of Indian agriculture 2007: Potential to improve lives ofryots. The Hindu.

  • Pray, C.E., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Rozelle, S. (2002). Five years of Bt cotton in China the benefits continue. The Plant Journal, 57(4), 423-430.

  • Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G., & Zilberman, D. (2006). Adoption ofBt cotton and impact variability: Insights from India. Review of Agricultural Economics, 25(1), 48-58.

  • Smale, M., Zambrano, P., & Cartel, M. (2006). Bales and balance: A review of the methods used to assess the economic impact of Bt cotton on farmers in developing economies.AgBioforum 9(3), 195-212.

  • Subramanian, A., & Quim, M. (2010). The impact of bt cotton on poor households in rural India. .Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 295-311.

  • Shetty, P.K. (2004). Socio-ecological implications of pesticide use in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39), 261-267.


Abstract Views: 320

PDF Views: 1




  • Impact of Bt. Cotton and Non Bt./Desi Cotton Growing on Socio-Economic Status of Farmers in Bhiwani District

Abstract Views: 320  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Jatesh Kathpalia
Department of Soeiology, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
Subhash Chander
Department of Soeiology, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
Vinod Kumari
Department of Soeiology, CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana, India

Abstract


Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) cotton is commonly grown in all over the world to control wide range of pests. The farmers benefited from BT cotton through increased yield revenue and gross margin. While the farmer maid savings on insecticide costs they had to spend more on seed and harvesting. The farmers made savings on insecticide costs they had to spend more on seed and harvesting. Farming households used the additional income mostly for investment in people (education)and physical resources (cotton & other crop production). This research paper conducts to assess the impact of Bt. cotton and Desi/non-Bt. cotton on socio-economic status of farmers. The study was conducted among 120 farmers in Bhiwani districts of Haryana State through survey method. The findings of the study elucidate that investment on education of children was reported increased by 83.33 per cent and 66.66 per cent of respondents growing Bt. cotton and desi cotton respectively. Expenditure on social ceremonies was felt increased by 70.83 per cent and 50 per cent of the respondents growing Bt. cotton and desi cotton/hybrids respectively.

Keywords


Bt. Cotton, Pests, Insecticide, Desi/Non-Bt. Cotton, Socio-Economic Status.

References