Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perceived Risk Taking Behaviour among Rural and Urban Adolescents


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was undertaken to assess determinants o f perceived risk taking behavior among rural and urban adolescents in rural and urban Ludhiana district o f Punjab state. The sample comprised o f 300 school going adolescents (16-18 years) selected randomly from Government Senior Secondary Schools. A Personal Information Sheet was used to record data regarding demographic profile o f the adolescents. A scale developed by Gullone et al. (2000) was used to assess the perceived risk taking behavior among adolescents. Significant locale differences were found in case ofboys from low level o f perceived risk taking behaviour category. Significant locale differences were found in rural and urban girls in high level o f risk taking behaviour. In total sample non-significant locale differences were found in all the three levels o f perceived risk-taking behaviour. Significant gender wise differences were found between rural girls and boys in all the three levels o f perceived risk-taking behaviour. In total sample significant gender wise differences were found in low level o f risk-taking behavior category.

Keywords

Risk Taking Behavior, Adolescents, Perception.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alexander, C.S., Kim, Y.J., Ensminger, M., Johnson, K.E., & Dolan, L.J. (1990). A measure of risk-taking for young adolescents: Relaibility and validity assessments. Journal o f Youth and Adolescence, 19(6), 559-569.
  • Bayar, N., & Sayil, M. (2005). Brief report: Risk-taking behaviors in a non-western urban adolescent sample. Journal o f Adolescence, 28(5), 61X-16.
  • Bern, D.J. (1962). Risk taking questionnaire. National psychological corporation Agra.
  • Boyer, T.W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26(3), 291-345.
  • Brown, B.B., Clasen, D.R., & Eicher, S.A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, -22(4), 521-530.
  • Chaubey, L. (1974). Risk taking questionnaire. National Psychological Corporation Agra.
  • Dahl, R.D. (2004). Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. In R E. Dahl and L. P. Spear (Eds.), Adolescent brain development: Vulnerabilities and opportunities. Annals ofthe New York academy o f sciences (Vol. 1021, pp. 1-22). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Ginsburg, E.P. (1983). Flaubert and the Historical Novel: Salammbo reassessed by Anne green. Nineteenth-Century French Studies, 72(1-2), 232-234.
  • Horbin, J. (1974). Risk taking questionnaire. National Psychological Corporation Agra.
  • Kelley, A.E., Schochet, T., & Landry, C.F. (2004). Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence. AnnalsNew York Social Science,10, 27-32.
  • Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk taking questionnaire. National psychological corporation Agra.
  • Lang B (2011) A comparison of risk-taking measures. Journal o f Undergraduate Research at Minnesota State University, Mankato.
  • Oxford Dictionary (1978). Verbal measure o f risk taking. Agra psychological cell.
  • Reniers, S.P., Murphy, L., & Wood, S.J. (2016). Risk perception and risk-taking behaviour during adolescence: The influence ofpersonality and gender. Journal o f Adolescent, 77(4), 55-67.
  • Richward, L. (2010). Risk-taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 76(2), 55-59.
  • Saha, D., & Krishna, E. (1991). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 106-178.
  • Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: What changes and why? Journal ofthe Academy of.Science,102, 51-58.
  • Tull, M. (2009). About.com Guide.
  • Von, B., & Haller, G. (1970). Psychology. Harper and Row Publisher, New York.

Abstract Views: 368

PDF Views: 2




  • Perceived Risk Taking Behaviour among Rural and Urban Adolescents

Abstract Views: 368  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Manpreet Kaur
Department of Human Development, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Tejpreet Kaur Kang
Department of Human Development, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Abstract


The present study was undertaken to assess determinants o f perceived risk taking behavior among rural and urban adolescents in rural and urban Ludhiana district o f Punjab state. The sample comprised o f 300 school going adolescents (16-18 years) selected randomly from Government Senior Secondary Schools. A Personal Information Sheet was used to record data regarding demographic profile o f the adolescents. A scale developed by Gullone et al. (2000) was used to assess the perceived risk taking behavior among adolescents. Significant locale differences were found in case ofboys from low level o f perceived risk taking behaviour category. Significant locale differences were found in rural and urban girls in high level o f risk taking behaviour. In total sample non-significant locale differences were found in all the three levels o f perceived risk-taking behaviour. Significant gender wise differences were found between rural girls and boys in all the three levels o f perceived risk-taking behaviour. In total sample significant gender wise differences were found in low level o f risk-taking behavior category.

Keywords


Risk Taking Behavior, Adolescents, Perception.

References