Indian Journal of Innovations and Developments

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Biological Agents as Substitutes for Chemical Seed Treatment on Groundnut Cultivation


Affiliations
1 PG Dept, Queen Marys College, Chennai-600004, Tamil Nadu, India
 

Field trials were conducted during the years 2009-2010, at a private farm in Puttaparthi, Anantapur District, India, to study the effect of biological agents as effective seed treatment substitutes over commonly used chemicals on ground nut plants,Arachis hypogea. The biological agents (BA) tested for this purpose involved, BGA,Azotobacter and Azospirillum. Seeds were treated prior to sowing with each of these 3 agents both individually and in combination. Commonly used chemical for seed treatment, was used as the control. The treated seeds were sown on the soil combination, 3:1 FYM: NPK. BGA proved to be the best among the 3 biological agents. The effect of Azotobacter was marginal when used alone. However, the same was augmented in the presence of BGA. Azospirillum seemed to have a negative effect on growth and yield, when applied alone and in combination with BGA.

Keywords

Biofertilizer, Arachis Hypogea, Yield FYM, NPK, BA, BGA
User
Notifications

  • Abd-El Rasoul, Sh M, El Banna AA, Abdel Moniem MM and Amer AA. (2002). Bio and organic fertilization of peanut plant grown on new reclaimed sandy soil. Egypt. J. Appli. Sci., 17, 127-142.

  • Badole SB and More SD. (2001a). Residual effect of integrated nutrient management o yield of summer groundnut. J. of Maharashtra Agricultural Univ., 26, 109-110.

  • Badole SB, More SD and Raut MM. (2001b). Residual effect of different organic and inorganic nutrient sources on yield and quality of groundnut. Annals of plant physiology, 15, 54-57.

  • Badole SB, More SD, Adsul PB, Shaikh AK and Dhamak AL. (2004). Residual effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on yield and gross monetary returns of groundnut (Arachis hypogea). J. of Soils and Crops, 14, 196-197.

  • Chapman HD and Pratt RT. (1978). Methods of Analysis for Soils. Plants and Water Unitv. Of California. Div. Agric. Sci. Priced

  • El-Habbasha SF, Kandil AA, Abu-Hegaza NS, Abd El Haleem AK, Khalafallah MA and Behairy TG. (2005). Effect of phosphorus levels and some bio-fertilizers on dry matter, yield and yield attributes of groundnut. Bull. Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ. 56, 237-252.

  • El-Kramany MF, Amany A.Bahr, Manal F. Mohamed and Kabesh MO. (2007). Utilization of Bio-Fertilisers in Field Crops Production 16-Groundnut Yield, its Components and Seeds Content as Affected by Partial Replacement of Chemical Fertilizers by Bio- Organic Fertilizers. J. Applied Sciences research, 3(1), 25-29.

  • Kumaran S. (2001) Response of groundnut to organic manure, fertilizer levels, split application under irrigated conditions. Research on crops, 2, 156-158.

  • Laxminarayana K. (2004). Effect of organic and inorganic manures on yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut in Ultisols of Mizoram. J of Oilseeds Res., 21, 280-283.

  • Nagaraj MV, Malliagawad , LH and Biradar DP. (2001). Productivity and economics of confectionery groundnut as influenced by plant density and fertilizer management. Karnataka J. of Agricultural Sci., 14, 932-937.

  • Subrahmaniyan K, Kalaiselven P, Maniekam G and Arulmozhi N. (2000). Response of confectionary groundnut varieties to organic and inorganic fertilizers. Crop Res. Hisar., 19, 207-209.

  • Subbarao PV, Subrahmanyam P and Reddy PM. (1990). A modified a print scales for assessment of rust and late leafspot of groundnut. Paper presented at the Second International Congress of the French Phytopathological Society, Montopellier, France, 28-30 November, 1990.

  • Thakare GV, Ulemale RB, Shivankar RS and Dahiphale AV. (2003). Morphological indices and yield attributes as influenced by integrated nutrient management in summer groundnut. Annals of Plant Physiology, 17-15.

  • Venkataramana P and kiraman NJ. (2002). Influence of different levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers on groundnut cultivars. Environment and Ecology, 20, 89-91.


Abstract Views: 355

PDF Views: 72




  • Effect of Biological Agents as Substitutes for Chemical Seed Treatment on Groundnut Cultivation

Abstract Views: 355  |  PDF Views: 72

Authors

S. Sujanya
PG Dept, Queen Marys College, Chennai-600004, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Chandra
PG Dept, Queen Marys College, Chennai-600004, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Field trials were conducted during the years 2009-2010, at a private farm in Puttaparthi, Anantapur District, India, to study the effect of biological agents as effective seed treatment substitutes over commonly used chemicals on ground nut plants,Arachis hypogea. The biological agents (BA) tested for this purpose involved, BGA,Azotobacter and Azospirillum. Seeds were treated prior to sowing with each of these 3 agents both individually and in combination. Commonly used chemical for seed treatment, was used as the control. The treated seeds were sown on the soil combination, 3:1 FYM: NPK. BGA proved to be the best among the 3 biological agents. The effect of Azotobacter was marginal when used alone. However, the same was augmented in the presence of BGA. Azospirillum seemed to have a negative effect on growth and yield, when applied alone and in combination with BGA.

Keywords


Biofertilizer, Arachis Hypogea, Yield FYM, NPK, BA, BGA

References