International Journal of Information Library and Society

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Defining Chemical Science Research:Conclusions From a Critical Review of the Literature


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Studies in Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objective: To summarize findings from a systematic exploration of existing literature and views regarding chemical science, to discuss themes and components of such work, and to propose a theoretically based definition of chemical science research.

Data Sources/Study Setting: The major data sources were used: Google search with researchers from various disciplines, and a systematic review of the scientometrics literature.

Study Design: Systematic review of literature, Data Collection/Extraction Methods. We reviewed 18 definitions of scientometrics literature in the fields of study, that definition was then field tested by 18 individuals with scientometrics research experience, and their research responses proposed in this paper.

Principal Findings: Three key definitional characteristics were identified: Without constant pressure for theory building, the field would surely slide to its natural resting place in dust-bowl empiricism.

Conclusion: Existing literature from several fields did not provide a definition for scientometrics research of sufficient specificity to facilitate activities.


Keywords

Chemical Science, Review of Literature, Collaboration, Research, Definition.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Sangam, S. L., & Keshava. (2003). Growth patterns of literature in the field of social science. Journal of Information Management, 40(1), 77-84.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Kadi, A. S. (2003). Indicators for Demographic Research: A cross national assessment. Paper presented at 9th international Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics. August 25-29, 2003.

  • Sangam, S. L., Meera & Megeri, M. N. (2008). Growth patterns of Indian chemical science literature: A scientometric analysis. Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, 2(l), 99-109.

  • Bala, A., & Gupta, B. M. (2010). Mapping of Indian neuroscience research: A Scientometric analysis of research output during 1999-2008. Neurology India, 58(1), 35-40.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Bagalkoti, V. T. (2012). Science and technology research output of asian countries using science and technology indicators. Contemporary Research in India, 2(4), 18-28.

  • Biradar, B. S., & Rajashekhar, G. R. (2010, December). Scientometric analysis of biotechnology literature. In Sangam and Others (Eds.). Proceedings of National Seminar on Webometrics, Informetrics and scientometrics, DLISc, K. U. Dharwad (pp. 134-145).

  • Hadagali, G. S., Kumbar, B. D., & Keshava (2010, December). Collaboration trends in emerging disciplines of Library and information science. In Sangam and Others (Eds.). Proceedings of National Seminar on Webometrics, Informetrics and scientometrics, DLISc, K. U. Dharwad (PP. 179-186).

  • Kaur, H., & Gupta, B. M. (2010). Mapping of dental science in India: A scientometric analysis of India’s research output, 1990-2008. Scientometrics, 1-16.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Meera. (2011). Scientometric analysis of chemical science journals. International Journal of Information Research, 1(2), 1-14.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Bagalkoti, V. T. (2012). Ranking of NAAC Accredited Indian Universities. In Sadashivamurthy, P. et al. (Eds.). Scientometrics Proceedings, 317-330.

  • Garfield, E. (1984). A Tribute to S. R. Ranganathan, the Father of Indian Library Science. Part 1. Life and Works. Current Contents, 6, 5-12.

  • Gupta, B. M., Kumar, S., & Karisiddappa, C. R. (1997). Collaboration profile of theoretical population genetics specialty. Scientometrics, 39(1997), 293-314.

  • Mueen, K. K., & Gupta, B. M. (2013). India’s contribution on antioxidants: a bibliometric analysis, 2001-10. Scientometrics, 94, 741-754.

  • Neelamma, G., & Anandahalli, G. (2016). Application of Bradford’s law in the field of crystallography: A scientometric study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 6(2), 77-83.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Biradar, B. S. (1990). Pattern of information use by Indian surgical scientists: A citation analysis. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 37(4), 133-142.

  • Sangam, S. L., & Meera. (2012). Obsolescence Factors and Pattern of Citation Distribution in the field of Chemical Science. Journal of Advances in librarianship, 3(1), 1-8.

  • Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., & Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101, 125-158.

  • Jaric, I., Cvijanovic, G., Knezevic-Jaric, J., & Lenhardt, M. (2012). Trends in fisheries science from 2000 to 2009: A bibliometric study. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 20(2), 70-79.


Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 0




  • Defining Chemical Science Research:Conclusions From a Critical Review of the Literature

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. Chaman Sab
Dept. of Studies in Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India
P. Dharani Kumar
Dept. of Studies in Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India
B. S. Biradar
Dept. of Studies in Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Objective: To summarize findings from a systematic exploration of existing literature and views regarding chemical science, to discuss themes and components of such work, and to propose a theoretically based definition of chemical science research.

Data Sources/Study Setting: The major data sources were used: Google search with researchers from various disciplines, and a systematic review of the scientometrics literature.

Study Design: Systematic review of literature, Data Collection/Extraction Methods. We reviewed 18 definitions of scientometrics literature in the fields of study, that definition was then field tested by 18 individuals with scientometrics research experience, and their research responses proposed in this paper.

Principal Findings: Three key definitional characteristics were identified: Without constant pressure for theory building, the field would surely slide to its natural resting place in dust-bowl empiricism.

Conclusion: Existing literature from several fields did not provide a definition for scientometrics research of sufficient specificity to facilitate activities.


Keywords


Chemical Science, Review of Literature, Collaboration, Research, Definition.

References