Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Perception and Usage of Virtual Learning Among the Women Academicians: A Study
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This study is aimed to examine the virtual learning in the perspectives of the women academicians in Chennai. Questionnaire method was adopted to collect the data. Out of 225 Questionnaire 198 were received back. This study examines the characteristics of the respondents, benefits of virtual learning, tools and techniques used for virtual learning, kinds of training required for virtual learning and difficulties in virtual learning. The highest number of respondents 21(8.58%) were for the opportunity of powerful information sharing, 19(9.59%) were for open source version of tools because of the rapid growth of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) open educational sources were available tremendously. 25(12.62%) were for meet their level of knowledge and interest. The highest number of respondents 32(16.16%) were identified in the difficulty of handling new technologies. 23(11.61%) were lack of common goals, 21(10.6%) were identified that the students may feel isolated.
Keywords
Virtual Learning, Women Academicians, Information and Communication Technology.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Greenhow, C. A., Robelia, B. B., & Hughes, J. E. C. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Education Researchers, 38(4), 246-259.
- Adesina, A., & Molloy, D. (2012). Virtual learning environments versus virtual learning process environments, IADIS International Conference e-Learning 2012, Part of the IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 2012, MCCSIS 2012; Lisbon; Portugal; 17 July 2012 through 20 July 2012; Code 100742, P 71-81.
- Barnett, J. M. C., Pherson, V., & Sandieson, R. M. (2013). Connected teaching and learning: The uses and implications of connectivism in an online class. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 685-698.
Abstract Views: 579
PDF Views: 2