International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Knowledge Benchmarking Process Framework:A New Basis to Analyse Megaproject Challenges and Practices


Affiliations
1 Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada
2 Department of Automated Manufacturing Engineering, Ecole De Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
3 Dubai Aviation Engineering Projects, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Megaprojects face many pathologies and challenges to provide the attended impacts. These pathologies contribute to overshadow the results and outcomes needed by those who promote these kind of projects. So, we need to understand and assess properly the dynamics related to megaprojects. To overcome this situation, we present a new way to analyse megaprojects based on a knowledge benchmarking process framework.

Keywords

Megaprojects, Communities of Practice, Benchmarking, Knowledge Management.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akhavan, P., Shirazi, H., Sabzaligol, A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2013). A framework for organizational knowledge assessment by combining BSC and EQFM: A case of Besat Industry Complex, Iran. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, p. 2.

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.

  • Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Brooking Institue press, Washington, D.C.

  • Bauer, J., Tanner, S. J., & Nelle, A. (2004). Developping A performance measurement audit template: A benchmarking study. Measuring Business Excellence, 8(4), 17-25.

  • Bolisani, E., & Oltramari, J. A. (2011). Knowledge as a measurable object in business contexts: A flow approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10, 275-286.

  • Brockman, C., Brezinski, H., & Erbe, A. (2016). Innovation in construction megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management Journal, 142(11), 1-9.

  • Buck, J.-Y. (2003). Le management des connaissances et des compétences en pratique. Editions d’Organisation, Paris.

  • Carrillo, J. E., & Gaimon, C. (2000). Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Science, 265-288.

  • Davenport, T., & Probst, G. (2001). Knowledge management case book. Verlag, Wiley & Sons, Germany.

  • De Jager, M. (1999). The KMAT: Benchmarking knowledge management. Library Management, 20(7), 367-372.

  • Dumez, H. (2012). Les mega-projets. Annales des Mines-Gerer et Comprendre, 110, 72-74.

  • Eweje, J., Turner, R., & Muller, R. (2012). Maximizing strategic value from megaprojects: The influence of informationfeed on decision-making by the project manager. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 639-651.

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2014a). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview Project Management Journal, 45(22), 9-16.

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (Ed.). (2014b). Megaproject planning and management: Essential readings. Edward Elgar, Chelthenham, UK.

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Garbuio, B., & Lovallo, D. (2009). Delusion and deception in large infrastructure projects: Two models for explaining and preventing executive disaster. California Management Review, 51(2), 170-193.

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2005). How (In) accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 131-146.

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279-295.

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2004). “What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? Transport Reviews, 24(1), 3-18.

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risks: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 207 pages.

  • Forstenlechner, I., Lettice, F., & Bourne, M. (2009). Knowledge pays: Evidence from a law firm. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 56-68.

  • Forstenlechner, I., Lettice, F., Bourne, M., & Webb, C. (2007). Turning knowledge into value in professional service firms. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 8(3), 146-156.

  • Geller, P. K., & Lynch, B. D. (2003). Mega-projetcs as Displacements. International Social Science Journal, 55, 15-25.

  • Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it Simple? A sa case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 781-790.

  • Haynes, W. (2002). Transportation at the Millennium: In search of megaproject lens. The Review of Policy Research, 19(2), 62-89.

  • Heunis, C. (2016). Behavioural Factors and Megaproject Success. Civil Engineering, 60-62.

  • Jaafari. A. (2003). Project Management in The Age of Complexity and Change. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 47-57.

  • Kardes, I., Oztukk, A., Cavusgil, S.T., & Cavusgil, E. (2013). Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management. International Business Review, 22, 905-917.

  • Latour, B. (1987), Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers trough society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Lethonen, M. (2014). Evaluatiing megaprojects: From the iron triangle to networks mapping. Evaluation, 20(3), 278-295.

  • Malhotra, Y. (2005) Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: Getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 7-28.

  • Marques, D. P., & Simon, F. J. G. (2006). The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 143-156.

  • Mesnard, X., & Tarondeau, J. C. (2003). Utiliser l’audit par benchmarking pour améliorer les performances. Revue Française de Gestion, 6(147), 247-258.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997), La Connaissance Creatrice: La Dynamique de l’Entreprise Apprenante. De Boeck, Bruxelles.

  • Pau, F., Langeland, A., & Nja, B. O. (2016). Assessing Cultural Influences in Megaprojects Practices. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 44(2), 56-73.

  • Pavlin, S. (2006). Community of Practices in Small Research Institute. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 136-144.

  • Project Management. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.

  • Project Management. (2006). Standard for Program Management. Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.

  • Roult, R., & Lefebvre, S. (2012). Le grand projet urbain comme element interpretatif des transformations metropolitaines: Evolutions conceptuelles et liens analytiques avec la notion de regeneration urbaine, Document Chaire Ivanhoe Cambridge, ESG, UQAM, 01-2012, 23 pages.

  • Sanderson, J. (2012). Risk, Uncertainty and Governance in megaprojects: A Critical Discussion of Alternative Explanations. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 432-443.

  • Strassman, W. P., & Wells, J. (1998). The global construction industry: Strategies for entry, growth and survival. Unwin Hyman, London, p.275.

  • Siemiatycki, M. (2016). The making and impacts of a classic text in megaproject management: The case of cost overrun research. International Journal of Project Management, 1-10.

  • Van Marrewjik. A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Veenswijk, M. (2008). Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 591-600.

  • Zaim, H., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2007). Performance of Knowledge Management Practices: A Causal Analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 54-67.

  • Tremblay, D G. (2004). Les communautés virtuelles de praticiens: Vers de nouveaux modes d’apprentissage et de création de connaissances? Possibles, 66-79.

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Abstract Views: 272

PDF Views: 0




  • The Knowledge Benchmarking Process Framework:A New Basis to Analyse Megaproject Challenges and Practices

Abstract Views: 272  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Patrick Mbassegue
Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada
Mickael Gardoni
Department of Automated Manufacturing Engineering, Ecole De Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada
Zain Tahboub
Dubai Aviation Engineering Projects, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Abstract


Megaprojects face many pathologies and challenges to provide the attended impacts. These pathologies contribute to overshadow the results and outcomes needed by those who promote these kind of projects. So, we need to understand and assess properly the dynamics related to megaprojects. To overcome this situation, we present a new way to analyse megaprojects based on a knowledge benchmarking process framework.

Keywords


Megaprojects, Communities of Practice, Benchmarking, Knowledge Management.

References