International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Organisational Performance through Knowledge Managements’ SECI Model:A Mediating Role of Innovation


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Department of Human Resource Management & OB, School of Business Studies, Central University of Jammu, J&K, India
2 Associate Professor, Department of Marketing & Supply Chain Management, School of Business Studies, Central University of Jammu, J&K, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Organizational Performance is the predominant dependent variable of any firm. It allows managers and researchers to evaluate firm’s activities and also compare its results with competitors. To gain the competitive edge, business organizations have to find out different types of resources/assets, viz., tangible and intangible (Hunt & Davis, 2008). Organizations also have to manage such assets efficiently and effectively to achieve superiority in the marketplace (ibid). Presently, many firms give more empathize to their intangible assets like ‘knowledge’ (Ali & Ahmad, 2006; Lirios et al., 2018). Consequently, organisations have to recognize innovation and manage such knowledge in systematic manner (Cardinal, 2001; De Silva et al., 2018). The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship between knowledge management and innovation (Product and Process Innovation) and its impact on organizational performance and also provide an integrated model of Knowledge Management – Innovation - Organizational Performance. The research reported here was to conduct a quantitative survey to build a broader set of evidence of the use of the SECI model in Indian banking Industry and its impact on the organizational performance. Under this research, a new survey was conducted with 292 ‘Probationary Officers’ working in 90 branches of ‘Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd’ located in Jammu district (tested using factor analysis and Structural equation modelling) and successfully prove the connection between the knowledge management practices

Keywords

Knowledge, Knowledge Management, Innovation, Organizational Performance, SECI Model.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ali, H. M., & Ahmad, N. H. (2006). Knowledge management in Malaysian banks: A new paradigm. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 7(3), 1-13.

  • Alrawi, K., & Elkhatib, S. (2009). Knowledge management practices in the banking industry: Present and future state-case study. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(4), 68-84.

  • Alrubaiee, L. (2012). Exploring the Relationship between ethical sales behavior, relationship quality, and customer loyalty. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(1), 7-25.

  • Alrubaiee, L., Alzubi, H. M., Hanandeh, R. E., & Al Ali, R. (2015). Investigating the relationship between knowledge management processes and organizational performance the mediating effect of organizational innovation. International Review of Management and business research, 4(4 Part 1), 989.

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349-359.

  • Armistead, C. (1999). Knowledge management and process performance. The Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 143-154.

  • Arslan, A., & Staub, S. (2013). Theory X and Theory Y type leadership behavior and its impact on organizational performance: Small business owners in the şishane lighting and chandelier district. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 102-111.

  • Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 226-235.

  • Awad, E. M., & Ghaziri, H. M. (2004). Knowledge management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.

  • Barachini, F. (2009). Cultural and social issues for knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 98-110.

  • Belaid Kridan, A., & Steven Goulding, J. (2006). A case study on knowledge management implementation in the banking sector. Vine, 36(2), 211-222.

  • Betz, F. (1993). Strategic technology management. McGraw-Hill.

  • Bhatia, A., & Aggarwal, K. (2018). Impact of investment in intangible assets on corporate performance in India. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(5), 1058-1073.

  • Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.

  • Bolaji Bello, O., & Adeoye, A. O. (2018). Organizational learning, organizational innovation and organizational performance: Empirical evidence among selected manufacturing companies in Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Economics & Management, 33, 25-38.

  • Borgonovo, E., & Peccati, L. (2004). Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 17-25.

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Byukusenge, E., & Munene, J. C. (2017). Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1368434.

  • Byukusenge, E., Munene, J., & Orobia, L. (2016). Knowledge management and business performance: Mediating effect of innovation. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 4(4), 82-92.

  • Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539-553.

  • Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.

  • Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19-36.

  • Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1257-1278.

  • Cebi, F., Aydin, O. F., & Gozlu, S. (2010). Benefits of knowledge management in banking. Journal of Transnational Management, 15(4), 308-321.

  • Chatzoudes, D., Chatzoglou, P., & Vraimaki, E. (2015). The central role of knowledge management in business operations: Developing a new conceptual framework. Business Process Management Journal, 21(5), 1117-1139.

  • Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance-The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104-114.

  • Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40(5), 403-417.

  • Chong, C. W., Holden, T., Wilhelmij, P., & Schmidt, R. A. performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.

  • Chuang, C. H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge. Journal of management, 42(2), 524-554.

  • Cooper, J. R. (1998). A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation. Management Decision, 36(8), 493-502.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

  • Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.

  • Daft, R. L. (2000). Organization theory and design (7th ed.) South-Western College Publishing, Thomson Learning. U.S.A

  • Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45-65.

  • Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115.

  • Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210-222.

  • Daugherty, P. J., Chen, H., & Ferrin, B. G. (2011). Organizational structure and logistics service innovation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(1), 26-51.

  • Day, D. L. (1994). Raising radicals: Different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organization Science, 5(2), 148-172.

  • De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87.

  • De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166.

  • Donate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge- oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 360-370.

  • Dooley, L., & Som, O. (2018). Process exaptation: The innovation nucleus of non-R&D intensive SME’s? In ISPIM Innovation Symposium (pp. 1-17). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).

  • Dougherty, D., Munir, K., & Subramaniam, M. (2002, August). Managing technology flows in practice: A grounded theory of sustained innovation. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2002, No. 1, pp. E1-E6). Academy of Management.

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 67-72.

  • Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post capitalist society. New York, NY: Butter Worth Heinemann.

  • Duffy, J. (2000). Something funny is happening on the way to knowledge management. Information Management, 34(4), 64.

  • Easa, N. F. H. (2012). Knowledge management and the SECI model: A study of innovation in the Egyptian banking sector ( Doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling).

  • Eris, E. D., & Saatcioglu, O. Y. (2006). A system look for technological innovation: Firm based perspective In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), July (pp. 6-7).

  • Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795-827.

  • Firestone, J. M. (2001). Estimating benefits of knowledge management initiatives: concepts, methodology and tools. Journal of the KMCI, 1(3), 110-129.

  • García-Cruz, J., Real, J. C., & Roldán, J. L. (2018). Managerial perceptions of employees’ affective commitment and product innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(3), 290-305.

  • Gold, A. H., & Arvind Malhotra, A. H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. (1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25(1), 15-28.

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.

  • Grawe, S. J. (2009). Logistics innovation: A literature-based conceptual framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(3), 360-377.

  • Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.

  • Ha, S. T., & Lo, M. C. (2018). An empirical examination of knowledge management and organisational performance among Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 17(1), 23-37.

  • Haji, A. A., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2018). The role of intangible assets and liabilities in firm performance: empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 42-59.

  • Hall, R., & Andriani, P. (2002). Managing knowledge for innovation. Long Range Planning, 35(1), 29-48.

  • Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate?. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 873-886.

  • Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hoe, S. L. (2006). Tacit knowledge, Nonaka and Takeuchi SECI model and informal knowledge processes. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(4), 490.

  • Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128-140.

  • Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A., & Md Nor, K. (2018). Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(7-8), 798-816.

  • Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2009). The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. International journal of Manpower, 30(3), 285-301.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Davis, D. F. (2008). Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 10-21.

  • Inkinen, H. (2016). Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performance. Journal of knowledge management, 20(2), 230-257.

  • Ismail, S., & Ahmad, M. S. (2012). Effective personal knowledge management: A proposed online framework. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 72, 399-408.

  • Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.

  • Jayaram, J., Oke, A., & Prajogo, D. (2014). The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4424-4439.

  • Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K., & Gkana, V. (2015). Relationship between quality management, innovation and competitiveness. Evidence from Greek companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1177-1200.

  • Kamaşak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation. European Business Review, 22(3), 306-317.

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

  • Keat, K. K., & Lin, A. (2018). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance of Malaysian Private Colleges: A Mediating Role of Managing Talent Practices. Advances in Economics and Business, 6(2), 81-89.

  • Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Goluchowski, J. (2017). The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 521-537.

  • Kör, B., & Maden, C. (2013). The relationship between knowledge management and innovation in Turkish service and high-tech firms. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4).

  • Leong, J. C. (2018). Knowledge management and organizational performance: a qualitative study of selected institutions of higher education in Malaysia. University of Nottingham.

  • Lev, B., & Daum, J. H. (2004). The dominance of intangible assets: Consequences for enterprise management and corporate reporting. Measuring Business Excellence, 8(1), 6-17.

  • Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.

  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.

  • Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101-107.

  • Lirios, C. G., Espinosa, F., & Guillén, J. C. (2018) Model of intangible assets and capitals in organizations. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 5(6), 1-12.

  • Maier, R., & Remus, U. (2003). Implementing process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 62-74.

  • Manfredi Latilla, V., Frattini, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Berner, M. (2018). Knowledge management, knowledge transfer and organizational performance in the arts and crafts industry: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0367.

  • Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2002). People management and development: Human resource management at work. CIPD Publishing.

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64.

  • McElheran, K. (2015). Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case (s) of e-business adoption. Management Science, 61(6), 1197-1216.

  • Meihami, B., & Meihami, H. (2014). Knowledge Management a way to gain a competitive advantage in firms (evidence of manufacturing companies). International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 3, 80-91.

  • Mizintseva, M. F., & Gerbina, T. V. (2009). Knowledge management practice: Application in commercial banks (a Review). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36(6), 309-318.

  • Moreno, E. Z., Becerril, V. M., & Alcalde, J. R. (2018). Tacit and explicit knowledge: Comparative analysis of the prioritization of maternal health problems in Mexico. Gaceta sanitaria, 32(3), 251-261.

  • Mulaik, S. A. (1990). Blurring the distinctions between component

  • analysis and common factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 53-59.

  • Muthuveloo, R., Shanmugam, N., & Teoh, A. P. (2017). The impact of tacit knowledge management on organizational performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 192-201.

  • Newell, S. (2015). Managing knowledge and managing knowledge work: what we know and what the future holds. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 1-17.

  • Nold, H. 2009. New knowledge creation as a change management model. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(3), 1-10.

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory - 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21.

  • Obeidat, B. Y., Al-Suradi, M. M., Masa’deh, R. E., & Tarhini, A. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on innovation: An empirical study on Jordanian consultancy firms. Management Research Review, 39(10), 1214-1238.

  • Olson, C. A., & Schwab, A. (2000). The performance effects of human resource practices: the case of interclub networks in professional baseball, 1919-1940. Industrial Management. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0367. Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 39(4), 553-577.

  • Park, C., Vertinsky, I., & Becerra, M. (2015). Transfers of tacit vs. explicit knowledge and performance in international joint ventures: The role of age. International Business Review, 24(1), 89-101.

  • Redshaw, B. (2001). Evaluating organisational effectiveness. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(1), 16-18.

  • Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552.

  • Robinson, K. C., & Phillips McDougall, P. (2001). Entry barriers and new venture performance: a comparison of universal and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 659-685.

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Rowley, J. (2003). Knowledge management-the new librarianship? From custodians of history to gatekeepers to the future. Library management, 24(8/9), 433-440.

  • Runar Edvardsson, I., & Kristjan Oskarsson, G. (2011). Knowledge management and value creation in service firms. Measuring Business Excellence, 15(4), 7-15.

  • Sadeghi, A., & Rad, F. (2018). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management and innovation. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 151-160.

  • Saini, R. (2015). Linking knowledge management and innovation in SMEs: A structural equation modeling approach. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 45-64.

  • Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2017). The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

  • Shahriza Abdul Karim, N., Jalaldeen Mohamed Razi, M., & Mohamed, N. (2012). Measuring employee readiness for knowledge management using intention to be involved with KM SECI processes. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 777-791.

  • Shih, C. P., & Putri, D. U. (2018). Measuring the Effect of Team Characteristics, Team Effectiveness on Organizational Performance, Organizational Survival and Competitiveness: A Case Study of an Indonesian NGO, Yayasan Cinta Anak Bangsa by using PLS Method. In Operations and Service Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1623-1636). IGI Global.

  • Siadat, S. H. (2018). Knowledge management evaluation in a service sector: The case of Central Bank of Iran. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 9(1), 72-84.

  • Slavković, M., & Babić, V. (2013). Knowledge management, innovativeness, and organizational performance: Evidence from Serbia. Economic annals, 58(199), 85-107.

  • Smith, E. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.

  • Soetevent, A. R., & Bružikas, T. (2018). The Impact of Process Innovation on Prices: Evidence from Automated Fuel Retailing in The Netherlands. European Economic Review.

  • Tabachnick, B. G. (2001). Clearing Up Your Act: Screening Data Prior to Analysis (Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S., Eds), Using Multivariate Statistics.

  • Teng, J. T., & Song, S. (2011). An exploratory examination of knowledge-sharing behaviors: Solicited and voluntary. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 104-117.

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

  • Tiwana, A. (2002). The knowledge management toolkit: Orchestrating IT, strategy, and knowledge platforms. Pearson Education India.

  • Tryon Jr, C. A. (2016). Managing organizational knowledge: 3rd generation knowledge management and beyond. CRC Press.

  • Tserng, H. P., & Lin, Y. C. (2004). Developing an activity-based knowledge management system for contractors. Automation in Construction, 13(6), 781-802.

  • Uriarte, F. A. (2008). Introduction to knowledge management (pp. 45-65). Jakarta: ASEAN Foundation.

  • Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA.

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.

  • Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Semih Kimzan, H., & Eminoğlu, G. (2013). Role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and firm performance: A study of the banking sector in Turkey. European Journal of innovation management, 16(1), 92-117.

  • Valmohammadi, C., & Ahmadi, M. (2015). The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: A balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 131-159.

  • Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231.

  • Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the brave: Product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36-52.

  • Waggoner, D. B., Neely, A. D., & Kennerley, M. P. (1999), ‘The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Production Economics, 60(1), 53-60.

  • Walker, R. M. (2004). Innovation and organisational performance: Evidence and a research agenda.

  • Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21-44.

  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.

  • Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: an introduction and perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 6-14.

  • Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2006). Small‐firm performance: Modeling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268-284.

  • Yang, J. T. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83-90.

  • Zaefarian, G., Forkmann, S., Mitręga, M., & Henneberg, S. C. (2017). A capability perspective on relationship ending and its impact on product innovation success and firm performance. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 184-199.

  • Zaied, R. M. B., Louati, H., & Affes, H. (2015). The relationship between organizational innovations, internal sources of knowledge and organizational performance. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 6(1), 53-67.

  • Zawawi, N. F. M., Wahab, S. A., Al-Mamun, A., Yaacob, A. S., Samy, N. K. A., & Fazal, S. A. (2016). Defining the concept of innovation and firm innovativeness: A critical analysis from resorce-based view perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 87.


Abstract Views: 443

PDF Views: 0




  • A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Organisational Performance through Knowledge Managements’ SECI Model:A Mediating Role of Innovation

Abstract Views: 443  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Konika Singh Chib
Research Scholar, Department of Human Resource Management & OB, School of Business Studies, Central University of Jammu, J&K, India
Gaurav Sehgal
Associate Professor, Department of Marketing & Supply Chain Management, School of Business Studies, Central University of Jammu, J&K, India

Abstract


Organizational Performance is the predominant dependent variable of any firm. It allows managers and researchers to evaluate firm’s activities and also compare its results with competitors. To gain the competitive edge, business organizations have to find out different types of resources/assets, viz., tangible and intangible (Hunt & Davis, 2008). Organizations also have to manage such assets efficiently and effectively to achieve superiority in the marketplace (ibid). Presently, many firms give more empathize to their intangible assets like ‘knowledge’ (Ali & Ahmad, 2006; Lirios et al., 2018). Consequently, organisations have to recognize innovation and manage such knowledge in systematic manner (Cardinal, 2001; De Silva et al., 2018). The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship between knowledge management and innovation (Product and Process Innovation) and its impact on organizational performance and also provide an integrated model of Knowledge Management – Innovation - Organizational Performance. The research reported here was to conduct a quantitative survey to build a broader set of evidence of the use of the SECI model in Indian banking Industry and its impact on the organizational performance. Under this research, a new survey was conducted with 292 ‘Probationary Officers’ working in 90 branches of ‘Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd’ located in Jammu district (tested using factor analysis and Structural equation modelling) and successfully prove the connection between the knowledge management practices

Keywords


Knowledge, Knowledge Management, Innovation, Organizational Performance, SECI Model.

References