Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Status of Open Access Repositories: a Global Perspective


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kashmir., India
2 Masters in Library and Information Science, University of Kashmir., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose: The present study attempts to highlight the status of open access repositories globally. Methodology: Present study is based on the data gathered from open-DOAR. Data gathered were thoroughly analyzed based on chosen parameters, viz., geographical distribution, software usage, language diversity, operational status, repository type, and subject coverage. Findings: Open access (OA) repositories have witnessed potential growth trends particularly in developed countries. On the other hand, developing countries have also shown promising growth rate of open access repositories. This evidently signifies that these nations have become conscious of the need and importance of OA repositories. However, there is still much wider scope for their growth and development. Research Limitations/Implications: The study highlights status of only 2168 repositories registered in the Open-DOAR (Directory of Open Access Repositories) as on February 8-10, 2012. Future Research: The study provides wider perspective of open access repositories and further, can be enriched by including research facets like, content management policies, and impact of OA repositories on scholarly communication.

Keywords

Open Access, Scholarly Communication, Open Access Repositories, Directory of Open Access Repositories (Open-DOAR)
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Kiran, K. (2010). Global Visibility of Asian Universities Open Access Institutional Repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), pp. 53-73. Retrieved from http://myais. fsktm.um.edu.my/11585/1/article4.pdf.
  • Amerada , V., Gopakumar, V., & Baradol, A. K. (2011). Awareness and Use of Open Access and Free Resources on the Internet: A Case Study at BITS Pilani. Eighth International CALIBER INFLIBNET. Retrieved from http://ir.infl ibnet.ac.in/dxml/bitstream/handle/1944/1626/33.pdf?sequence=1.
  • Bhat, M. H. (2010). Open Access Repositories: A Review. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://unllib.unl.edu/LPP/hanief2.htm.
  • Chan, L. (2004). Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship inthe Digital Age: The Role of Open- Access Institutional Repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29(3), pp. 277-300. Retrieved from http://tspace.library. utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/2786/3/Chan_CJC_IR.pdf.
  • Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace. D-LIB Magazine, 13(3/4). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.
  • English Language. (2013). Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language.
  • Ghosh, S. B. & Das, A. K. (2007). Open Access and Institutional Repositories- A Developing Country Perspective: A Case Study of India. IFLA Journal, 33(3), pp. 229-250. doi: 10.1177/0340035207083304.
  • Gul, S., & Shah, T. A. (2013). A Lost Dimension in the Open Scholarly World: Authors’ Experiences and Open Access Publishing. In Tariq Ashraf and Puja Anand Gulati (Eds.), Design, Development, and Management of Resources for Digital Library Services (pp. 136-146). U.S.A.: IGI. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2500-6.ch012.
  • Gautam, S., Mishra, A. K., Pandey, P. S., Hariharan, C., & Guttikonda, A. (2010). Status of Open Access Repositories in India. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=sridhar_gutam.
  • Jacso, P. (2006). Open Access to Scholarly Full-Text Documents. Online Information Review, 30(5), pp. 587-594. doi.org/10.1108/14684520610706442.
  • Jain, P. (2012). Promoting Open Access to Research in Academic Libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.webpages.uidaho. edu/~mbolin/jain.htm.
  • Lynch, A. C., & Lippincott, K. J. (2005). Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005. D-lib Magzine. 11(9). doi: 10.1045/September 2005-Lynch.
  • Ottaviani, J., & Snavely, C. (2003). Towards a University of Michigan Institutional Repository: A Study and Prototype Proposal. Retrieved from http://www.lib.umich.edu/digital-library-production-service-dlps/towards-universitymichigan-institutional-repository-study-a.
  • Pinfield, S. (2004). A Mandate to Self-Archive? The Role of Open Access Institutional Repositories. The Geological Society. Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/152/1/mandate_to_archive.pdf.
  • Potocnik, J. (2008). Preface by the European Commission.Open Access- Opportunities and Challenges- A Handbook by the European Commission and the German Commission for UNESCO. (pp. 9). doi: 10.2777/93994.
  • Suber, P. (2012). Open Access Overview: Focusing on Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Research Articles and Their Preprints. Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.
  • Swan, A. (2005). Institutional Repositories: A Briefing Paper. JISC: U.K. Retrieved from http://www.keyperspectives. co.uk/openaccessarchive/Briefing%20papers/Briefing%20Paper.pdf.
  • Top Reasons to Use DSpace. (2013). DSpace. Retrieved from http://www.dspace.org/why-use.
  • Wani, Z. A., Gul, S., & Rah, J. A. (2009). Open Access Repositories: A Global Perspective with An Emphasis on Asia. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 27. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl27WGR.pdf.
  • Wilson., Myoung, C., & Jantz, R. C. (2011). Building Value-Added Services for Institutional Repositories (IR’S): Modelling the Rutgers Experience. IFLA, pp. 1-17. Retrieved from https://www.ideals. illinois. edu/bitstream /han-dle/2142/25875/BuildingWilsonJantz.pdf?sequence=2.
  • Zhigeng, W., Huiwei, L,. & Wenjing, Z. (2010). Open Access Resource Management: A New Role for the National Library of China. World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly: Sweden, pp. 1-18 Retrieved from http://conference.ifl a.org/past/ifl a76/132-zhigeng-en.pdf.

Abstract Views: 560

PDF Views: 5




  • Status of Open Access Repositories: a Global Perspective

Abstract Views: 560  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Sabha Ali
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kashmir., India
Sumaira Jan
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kashmir., India
Iram Amin
Masters in Library and Information Science, University of Kashmir., India

Abstract


Purpose: The present study attempts to highlight the status of open access repositories globally. Methodology: Present study is based on the data gathered from open-DOAR. Data gathered were thoroughly analyzed based on chosen parameters, viz., geographical distribution, software usage, language diversity, operational status, repository type, and subject coverage. Findings: Open access (OA) repositories have witnessed potential growth trends particularly in developed countries. On the other hand, developing countries have also shown promising growth rate of open access repositories. This evidently signifies that these nations have become conscious of the need and importance of OA repositories. However, there is still much wider scope for their growth and development. Research Limitations/Implications: The study highlights status of only 2168 repositories registered in the Open-DOAR (Directory of Open Access Repositories) as on February 8-10, 2012. Future Research: The study provides wider perspective of open access repositories and further, can be enriched by including research facets like, content management policies, and impact of OA repositories on scholarly communication.

Keywords


Open Access, Scholarly Communication, Open Access Repositories, Directory of Open Access Repositories (Open-DOAR)

References