International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Study on Selected Private Sector Enterprises in Bangladesh


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, Premier University, Chittagong, Bangladesh
2 Faculty of Business Studies, BGC Trust University, Chittagong, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The prime objective of the study is to examine existing state of corporate social responsibility practices in private sector enterprises in Bangladesh. It further examines the impact of key company features on the level of social practices. For fulfilling the objective of the study, the data have been collected from the annual reports and working executives of the selected forty private organisations of Bangladesh. In collecting primary data printed developed questionnaire are used. The private sector enterprises contributions in corporate social responsibility were measured by the fifteen-item social responsibility scale. The major finding of this study is that the private sector enterprises in Bangladesh employ a little money but expected to be responsible to the needs and expectations of the society. Selecting private sector enterprises through convenience sampling method might limit the generalizability of the results of current study. Future research directions are also discussed here.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility, Private Sector, Impact, Challenges, Growth, Dynamism.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaronson, S. A. (2003). Corporate responsibility in the global village: The British role model and the American laggard. Business and Society Review, 108(3), 309-38.

  • Ahmed, S., & Islam, M. S. (2008). Corporate social responsibility reporting. ASA University Review, 2(2), 127.

  • Anderson, J.W. (1986). Social responsibility and the corporation, business horizons, (As quoted in Griffi n, R. W.(1997). Management 5th ed, New Delhi, A.I.T.B.S. Publishers & Distribution, 110.

  • Aswathappa, K. (2005). Essentials of Business Environment Millenium Edition, India: Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai, 494-520.

  • Blyth, A. (2005). Business behaving responsibly. Director, 59(1), 30.

  • Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimentional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a defi nitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-95.

  • Cramer, J., Jonker, J., & Heijden, A. (2004). Making sense of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 215-22.

  • Fischer, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 391-400.

  • Frederick, W. (1986). Toward CSR3: why ethical analysis is indispensable and unavoidable in corporate Affairs. California Management Review, 28(2), 126-41.

  • Heinz, W., & Koontz, H. (2002). Management (A Global Perspective), U.S.A.: McGraw-hill, 66-70.

  • Knox, S., Maklan, S. S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies, Journal of Business Ethics, 61 (1), 7-8.

  • Lantos, G. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (7), 595-632.

  • Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2001). People and Profi ts? The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  • McGuire, J. (1963). Business and Society, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

  • McWilliams, A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the fi rm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-28.

  • Mees, A., & Bonham, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility belongs with HR. Canadian HR Reporter, 17(7), 11.

  • Nigar, S. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Bangladesh: Barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR. The Business and Economic Review, 1(3), 166-180.

  • Orlitzky, M. (2005). Payoffs to social and environmental performance. Journal of Investing, 14 (3), 48. Post, F. R. (2003). A response to “the social responsibility of corporate management: A classical critique”. Mid - American Journal of Business, 18(1), 25-35.

  • Ogrizek, M. (2002). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the branding of fi nancial services. Journal of Marketing, 6(3), 215-28.

  • Raihan, A. (2002). Corporate Responsibility Practices in Bangladesh: Results from a Benchmark Study. Centre for Policy Dialogue, Dhaka.

  • Reitz, H. J., & Jewell, L. N. (1985). Managing Illinois. Scott, Foresmand and Company, 451.

  • Griffi n, R. W. (1999). Management, Boston New York: Hpughton Miffl in Company, 111-123.

  • Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specifi c? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 119-27.

  • Robins, S. P., & Decenzo, D. A. (1995). Fundamentals of Management Essential concepts and Applications, USA: Prentice Hall Inc., 37-38.

  • Ryan, C. (2002). ‘The reputation wars’, AFR BOSS. Retrieved June 22, 2006, from www.afrboss.com.au/ printmagazine.asp?doc_id=22574.

  • Skinner, S. J & Ivanoevich, J. M. (Year). Business For 21st Century Millennium, U.S.A.: Homewood, IL60430, Boston, MA 02116, 133-155.

  • Van, M. M. (2003). Concepts and defi nitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95. Retrieved from proQuest database.

  • Williams, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility? Consumer Policy Review, 15(2), 34-51.

  • Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(3), 225-56.


Abstract Views: 478

PDF Views: 0




  • Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Study on Selected Private Sector Enterprises in Bangladesh

Abstract Views: 478  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sujan Kanti Biswas
Department of Management Studies, Premier University, Chittagong, Bangladesh
Rana Karan
Faculty of Business Studies, BGC Trust University, Chittagong, India

Abstract


The prime objective of the study is to examine existing state of corporate social responsibility practices in private sector enterprises in Bangladesh. It further examines the impact of key company features on the level of social practices. For fulfilling the objective of the study, the data have been collected from the annual reports and working executives of the selected forty private organisations of Bangladesh. In collecting primary data printed developed questionnaire are used. The private sector enterprises contributions in corporate social responsibility were measured by the fifteen-item social responsibility scale. The major finding of this study is that the private sector enterprises in Bangladesh employ a little money but expected to be responsible to the needs and expectations of the society. Selecting private sector enterprises through convenience sampling method might limit the generalizability of the results of current study. Future research directions are also discussed here.

Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility, Private Sector, Impact, Challenges, Growth, Dynamism.

References