Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Social-Psychological Factors and Knowledge Sharing During Product Development: A Study in India


Affiliations
1 T. A. Pai Management Institute, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this study, we examined relationships between social-psychological factors(SPFs) and knowledge sharing between individuals during product development (PD). More specifically, we examined the influence of three SPFs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) - attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control - upon individual knowledge sharing, during PD work. We characterized knowledge sharing two-fold as: codification and personalisation. We then used data from a sample of 284 individuals across 19 PD units of Indian manufacturing organisations to test hypotheses relating the SPFs to knowledge sharing behaviour. A key finding of this study is that attitude does not have a significant association with knowledge sharing but both subjective norm and perceived behavioural control do. The study draws attention to the idea that PD managers must pay careful attention to social-psychological aspects of individuals when they design knowledge management initiatives to improve performance. Future studies can also examine the same question with larger samples and across multiple contexts. A distinct feature of our study is the use of the TPB to study these relationships in the PD context.

Keywords

Product Development, Knowledge Sharing, Codification, Personalization, Social-Psychological Factors, Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185-204.
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control-From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 10-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Bakker, M., Leenders, R. T., Gabbay, S. M., Kratzer, J., & Van Engelen, J. M. L. (2006). Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. Learning Organization, 13(6), 594-605.
  • Bandura, A. (1980). Gauging the relationship between selfeffi cacy judgment and action. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4(2), 263-268.
  • Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. E. (2004). Social Psychology. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited.
  • Bock, G., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention-formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
  • Bordia, P., Irmer, B. E., & Abusah, D. (2006). Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefi ts. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 262-280.
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
  • Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735.
  • Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
  • Corso, M., Martini, A., Paolucci, E., & Pellegrini, L. (2001). Knowledge management in product innovation: an interpretative review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 341-352.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: Toward a Taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215-233.
  • Gray, P. H. (2001). A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices. Decision Support Systems, 31(1). 87-102.
  • Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefi ts: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133-1153.
  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2),106-116.
  • Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I., & Daigle, J. (2001). Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 165-178.
  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (2005). Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1156-1166.
  • Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Internal vs. external learning in new product development:Effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R & D Management, 30(3), pp. 213-223.
  • Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, H. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37-48.
  • Kumar, J. A., & Ganesh, L. S. (2009). Research on Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: A Morphology. Journal of Knowledge Management. 13(4), 161-174.
  • Kumar, J. A., & Ganesh, L.S. (2011a). Balancing knowledge strategy: codification and personalization during product development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 118-135.
  • Kumar, J. A., & Ganesh, L. S. (2011b). Inter-individual Knowledge Transfer and Performance in Product Development. The Learning Organization, 18(3), 224-238.
  • Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009) . Knowledge sharing in inter-organizational product development teams: the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 156-172.
  • Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2004). Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge-sharing behavior. Management Decision, 42(1), 108-125.
  • Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 57-93.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: D.C. Heath.
  • Ryu, S., Ho, S. H., & Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(1). 113-122.
  • Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843-851.
  • Schulze, A., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Knowledge creation in new product development projects. Journal of Management, 32(2), 210-236.
  • Soderquist, K. E. (2006). Organizing knowledge management and dissemination in new product development: Lessons from 12 global corporations. Long Range Planning, 39(5), 497-523.
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
  • Turner, S. F., Bettis, R. A., & Burton, R. M. (2002). Exploring depth versus breadth in knowledge management strategies. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory ,8 (1), 49-73.
  • Volz, D., Petendra, B., Schilcher, C., & Anderl, R. (2011). Balancing trust and knowledge protection in inter-organisational product design collaboration. International Journal of Product Development, 15(1-3), 71-89.
  • Vroom, R. W., & Olieman, A. M. (2011) . Sharing relevant knowledge within product development. International Journal of Product Development, 14(1-4), 34-52.
  • Wasko, M. M. & Faraj S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
  • Weirauch, W. (2004). First CAD search system based on 3D shapes. Hydrocarbon Processing, 83(6), 23-23.
  • Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4),45-58.

Abstract Views: 421

PDF Views: 2




  • Social-Psychological Factors and Knowledge Sharing During Product Development: A Study in India

Abstract Views: 421  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Ajith J. Kumar
T. A. Pai Management Institute, Karnataka, India

Abstract


In this study, we examined relationships between social-psychological factors(SPFs) and knowledge sharing between individuals during product development (PD). More specifically, we examined the influence of three SPFs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) - attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control - upon individual knowledge sharing, during PD work. We characterized knowledge sharing two-fold as: codification and personalisation. We then used data from a sample of 284 individuals across 19 PD units of Indian manufacturing organisations to test hypotheses relating the SPFs to knowledge sharing behaviour. A key finding of this study is that attitude does not have a significant association with knowledge sharing but both subjective norm and perceived behavioural control do. The study draws attention to the idea that PD managers must pay careful attention to social-psychological aspects of individuals when they design knowledge management initiatives to improve performance. Future studies can also examine the same question with larger samples and across multiple contexts. A distinct feature of our study is the use of the TPB to study these relationships in the PD context.

Keywords


Product Development, Knowledge Sharing, Codification, Personalization, Social-Psychological Factors, Theory of Planned Behaviour.

References