International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Learning Strategic Orientation for Enhancing Business Performance


Affiliations
1 Commerce, University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
2 University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the present globalised business climate, it is imperative for firms to interact with their environment and adopt the culture which stimulates behavioural change and performance improvements. In this context, strategic orientation has been accepted across the world as an excellent methodology for continuous improvement in every part of the organisation. The study emphasises the significance of different strategic orientations of firms by exploring seven important business philosophies (orientations), viz., production, selling, customer, market, learning, entrepreneurial, and relationship marketing orientation. It also throws light on the role of each strategic orientation in achieving competitive advantage and better firm's performance. The study suggests that practicing single strategic orientation by firms is not appropriate for divergent market contexts. Further, firms adopting plural orientation are more likely to perform even better than firms adopting only single strategic orientation. Therefore, firms should shift their focus from one strategic orientation to the combination of strategic orientation that firms can pursue in different situations as their success and survival depend on the integration of different strategic orientations.

Keywords

Strategic Orientation, Production Orientation, Selling Orientation, Customer Orientation, Market Orientation, Learning Orientation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Avlonitis, G., & Gounaris, S. (1999). Marketing Orientation and its Determinants: An Empirical Analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 33 (11/12), 1003-1037.

  • Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74.

  • Baker, W., & Sinkula, J. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427.

  • Barnes, J. G. (1994). Close to the Customer: But is it really a relationship? Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 561-570.

  • Bendapuri, N., & Berry, L. L. (1997). Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 15-37.

  • Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship Marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostak, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives of Services Marketing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

  • Bhuian, S. N., Menguc, B., & Bell, S. J. (2005). Just entrepreneurial enough: The moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 9-17.

  • Bonnemaizon, A., Cova, B., & Louyot, M. C. (2007). Relationship Marketing in 2015: A Delphi Approach. European Management Journal, 25(1), 50-59.

  • Breman, P., & Dalgic, T. (1998). The learning organization and market orientation: A study of export companies in The Netherlands. In J. B. Ford & E. D. Honeycutt (Eds), Developments in Marketing Science, 21, 214-231. Florida: Academy of Marketing Science.

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.

  • Davis, P. R. (2008). A relationship approach to construction supply chains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 310-327.

  • Day, G. S.(1999). The market driven organization: Understanding, attracting and keeping valuable customers. New York: The Free Press.

  • Day, G. S. (1990). Market driven strategy. New York: Free Press.

  • Deng, S., & Dart, J. (1994). Measuring market orientation: A multi-factor, multi-item approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 725-742.

  • Deshpande, R., & Farley, J. U. (1996). Understanding market orientation: A prospectively designed meta-analysis of the market orientation scales. Working Paper No. 96-125 (December), Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

  • Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in a Japanese fi rm: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23-70.

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

  • Enright, M. (2001). Approaches to market orientation and new product development in smaller enterprises: A proposal for a context-rich interpretive framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9(4), 301-313.

  • Fox, T., & Stead, S. (2001). Customer relationship managementdelivering the benefi ts. White Paper of Secor Consulting.

  • Fuhrman, D. (1991). Interactive electronic media. Sales and Marketing Management, 143(1), 44-47.

  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.

  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the fi rm and new performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.

  • Griffi th, D. A., Jacobs, L., & Richey, R. G. (2006). Fitting strategy derived from strategic orientation to international contexts. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(2) 239-262.

  • Grinstein, A. (2008). The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A metaanalysis. European Journal of Marketing, 42, 115-134.

  • Gronroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decisions, 32(2), 4-20.

  • Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429-438.

  • Hult, G. T. M., Nichols Jr, E. L., Giunipero, L. C., & Hurley, R. F. (1999). Global organizational learning in the supply chain: A low versus high learning study. Journal of International Marketing, 8(3), 61-83.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: Market orientation, relationship marketing and resource-advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 17-43.

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60, 107-114.

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53-70.

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-18.

  • Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.

  • Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Liu, S., Luo, X., & Shi, Y. Z. (2003). Market-oriented organizations in an emerging economy: A study of missing links. Journal of Business Research, 56, 481-491.

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.

  • Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J., & Ozsomer, A. (2002). The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 18-32.

  • McCann, J. E. (1991). Patterns of growth, competitive technology, and fi nancial strategies in young ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 189-208.

  • McNamara, C. (1972). The present status of the marketing concept. Journal of Marketing, 36(1), 50-57.

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of fi rms. Management Science, 29, 770-790.

  • Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established fi rms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 247-259.

  • Mottner, S., & Ford, J. (2004). Measuring nonprofit marketing strategy performance: The case museum store. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 829-840.

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990).The effect of a market orientation on business profi tability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.

  • Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J., & Gould, J. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 73-83.

  • Noble, C., Sinha, R., & Kumar, A. (2002).Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications.Journal of Marketing, 66, 25-39.

  • Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, G.T. M. (2005). The performance implications of fi t among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 49-65.

  • Peng, M. W., Tan, J., & Tong, T. W. (2004). Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. The Journal of Management Studies, 4(7), 1105-1129.

  • Saxe, R., &. Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 343-351.

  • Schoeffl er, S., Buzzell, R., & Heany, D. (1974). The impact of strategic planning on profi t performance. Harvard Business Review, 52, 137-157.

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does a competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46-55.

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization.Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.

  • Vyas, P. H. (2003). Market orientation as a business orientation. The Journal of BLS Institute of Management, 1, 31-48.

  • Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 37-48.

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A confi gurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71-91.

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hutt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.

  • Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43-58.

  • Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-775.


Abstract Views: 451

PDF Views: 0




  • Learning Strategic Orientation for Enhancing Business Performance

Abstract Views: 451  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sarabjeet Kour Sudan
Commerce, University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Bodh raj Sharma
University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Abstract


In the present globalised business climate, it is imperative for firms to interact with their environment and adopt the culture which stimulates behavioural change and performance improvements. In this context, strategic orientation has been accepted across the world as an excellent methodology for continuous improvement in every part of the organisation. The study emphasises the significance of different strategic orientations of firms by exploring seven important business philosophies (orientations), viz., production, selling, customer, market, learning, entrepreneurial, and relationship marketing orientation. It also throws light on the role of each strategic orientation in achieving competitive advantage and better firm's performance. The study suggests that practicing single strategic orientation by firms is not appropriate for divergent market contexts. Further, firms adopting plural orientation are more likely to perform even better than firms adopting only single strategic orientation. Therefore, firms should shift their focus from one strategic orientation to the combination of strategic orientation that firms can pursue in different situations as their success and survival depend on the integration of different strategic orientations.

Keywords


Strategic Orientation, Production Orientation, Selling Orientation, Customer Orientation, Market Orientation, Learning Orientation.

References