International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Determinants and Outcomes of Ethical Leadership in Universities:A Scale Development


Affiliations
1 Department of Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Management, University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Over recent years, ethical leadership has gained currency among scholars and practitioners, not only for its conceptual value but also for its practical value in enabling leaders to behave ethically. Ethical leadership refers to the leaders’ own value system, attitudes, decision-making and influence processes, and how these affect employee’s behavior. Conceptually ethical leadership can be understood as comprising value orientation, ethical attitudes and influence strategies of the leader as it has been discussed in an earlier research (Singh and Rathore, 2014). In organizational behaviour research, the outcomes of ethical leadership can be investigated at three levels, namely, the individual (micro), the work group (meso) and the organization (macro).

An instrument of ethical leadership would ideally be valuable in encouraging empirical research to understand better the importance of ethical leadership. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the development of a valid and reliable instrument measuring determinants and outcomes of ethical leadership in the context of universities in India. This research explains the process adopted to develop a valid and reliable instrument to access the perception of faculty members and administrative employees towards their immediate supervisors in universities. The procedures proposed by Trochim (2000) have been deployed to develop the scale used in the present research.

This paper is divided into four major sections: The first section of the study elaborates the process of item generation, generating 103 items from the literature and previous exploratory study (Singh and Rathore, 2014). In the second step, the items were put through expert testing using Likert scaling. For this purpose, 15 experts from the field of human resource management and organizational behaviour of different universities were contacted and asked their level of agreement for each item in the questionnaire. After this, the items were analyzed for corrected item-total correlations, upper-quartile and lower-quartile differences. This exercise enabled to reduce the number of items to 71. The final questionnaire thus prepared comprised 60 items to be measured on a five-point Likert scale. In the third part pilot-testing was conducted of a sample size of 50 respondents (faculty and administrative employees) of the Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, India selected through simple random sampling. Following this, discussion of results, managerial implications, limitations of the study and scope for future research are presented. The instrument so developed is found to have content validity and high reliability.

Keywords

Ethical Leadership, Ethics, Universities, Scale Development, Reliability.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1423.

  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. In B. B. Wolman & L. R. Pomroy (Eds.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis, and neurology (Vol. 10). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  • Bhal, K. T., & Dadhich, A. (2011). Impact of ethical leadership and leader-member exchange on whistle blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 485-496.

  • Bower, M. (2003). Company philosophy: The way we do things around here. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 111-117.

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.

  • Collins, D. (2010). Designing ethical organizations for spiritual growth and superior performance: An organization systems approach. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion,7, 95-117.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

  • De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69.

  • Khuntia, R., & Suar, D. (2004). A scale to assess ethical leadership of Indian private and public sector managers. Journal of business ethics, 49(1), 13-26.

  • Kottke, J. L., Pelletier, K. L., & Agars, M. D. (2013). Measuring follower confidence in top leadership direction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(4), 292-307.

  • Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behaviour: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157-170.

  • Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage.

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

  • Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151-171.

  • Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1-13.

  • Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2010). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 7-16.

  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, J. F., & Locander, W. B. (2009). Critical role of leadership on ethical climate and salesperson behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 125-141.

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Organizations and institutions. Foundations for Organizational Science.Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

  • Shin, Y. (2012). CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 299-312.

  • Singh, A., & Rathore, N. (2014, May). The organization is what the leader is: an ethical leadership framework for universities and research organizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (p. 16). IEEE Press.

  • Toor, S. U. R., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533-547.

  • Trochim, W. M. (2000). The research methods knowledge base. Retrieved September 20, 2011.

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275.


Abstract Views: 423

PDF Views: 0




  • Determinants and Outcomes of Ethical Leadership in Universities:A Scale Development

Abstract Views: 423  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nisha Rathore
Department of Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
Avantika Singh
Department of Management, University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


Over recent years, ethical leadership has gained currency among scholars and practitioners, not only for its conceptual value but also for its practical value in enabling leaders to behave ethically. Ethical leadership refers to the leaders’ own value system, attitudes, decision-making and influence processes, and how these affect employee’s behavior. Conceptually ethical leadership can be understood as comprising value orientation, ethical attitudes and influence strategies of the leader as it has been discussed in an earlier research (Singh and Rathore, 2014). In organizational behaviour research, the outcomes of ethical leadership can be investigated at three levels, namely, the individual (micro), the work group (meso) and the organization (macro).

An instrument of ethical leadership would ideally be valuable in encouraging empirical research to understand better the importance of ethical leadership. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the development of a valid and reliable instrument measuring determinants and outcomes of ethical leadership in the context of universities in India. This research explains the process adopted to develop a valid and reliable instrument to access the perception of faculty members and administrative employees towards their immediate supervisors in universities. The procedures proposed by Trochim (2000) have been deployed to develop the scale used in the present research.

This paper is divided into four major sections: The first section of the study elaborates the process of item generation, generating 103 items from the literature and previous exploratory study (Singh and Rathore, 2014). In the second step, the items were put through expert testing using Likert scaling. For this purpose, 15 experts from the field of human resource management and organizational behaviour of different universities were contacted and asked their level of agreement for each item in the questionnaire. After this, the items were analyzed for corrected item-total correlations, upper-quartile and lower-quartile differences. This exercise enabled to reduce the number of items to 71. The final questionnaire thus prepared comprised 60 items to be measured on a five-point Likert scale. In the third part pilot-testing was conducted of a sample size of 50 respondents (faculty and administrative employees) of the Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, India selected through simple random sampling. Following this, discussion of results, managerial implications, limitations of the study and scope for future research are presented. The instrument so developed is found to have content validity and high reliability.

Keywords


Ethical Leadership, Ethics, Universities, Scale Development, Reliability.

References