International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment in the Relationship between Empowering Leadership, and Engagement and Innovative Work Behaviour


Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Business Leadership, Addis Ababa University School of Commerce, Ethiopia
2 Assistant Professor, Addis Ababa University School of Commerce, Department of Marketing; President, Ethiopian Marketing Professionals Association (EMPA), Ethiopia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The main purpose of this study is to examine the influence of empowering leadership on employee innovative work behaviour and work engagement, which is mediated by psychological empowerment. The data were collected from 1,232 employees and 232 supervisors of 18 banks in Ethiopia. Reliability is assessed using Cronbach alpha; to asses validity we employed a structural equation modelling procedure using EQS 6.2. To test the hypothesis, multiple hierarchical regressions and PROCESS-macro model 4 were used. The findings suggest that: there is a positive relationship between empowering leadership and innovative work behaviour. Nevertheless, empowering leadership does not affect work engagement unless mediated by psychological empowerment. Meanwhile, empowering leadership significantly affects psychological empowerment. There is a positive influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behaviour and work engagement, and psychological empowerment mediates the indirect relationships between empowering leadership and the outcome variables, innovative work behaviour and work engagement. This study provides theoretical enrichment from the aspect of empowering leadership, and practically recommends that leaders can increase employee innovativeness and engagement by creating a work environment which ensures that employees feel empowered psychologically.

Keywords

Empowering Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, Innovative Work Behaviour, Work Engagement
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdolmaleki, J., Ashloublagh, M., Shahrabi, M., Ashlaghi, A., & Safdari, S. (2013). A study on effects of leadership style on innovation: A case study from automaker industry. Management Science Letters, 3(7), 1977-1982.

  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., Saeed, B. B., & Hafeez, S. (2017). Transformational and transactional leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledgeintensive industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 307-332.

  • Agbim, K. C. (2013). The impact of organizational structure and leadership styles on innovation. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 6(6), 56-63.

  • Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945.

  • Ahmad, I., & Gao, Y. (2018). Ethical leadership and work engagement: The roles of psychological empowerment and power distance orientation. Management Decision.

  • Albrecht, S. L., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 228-237.

  • Alkhodary, D. (2016). The relationship between employees’ empowerment and innovative work behavior. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), 4(2), 1-15.

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.

  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304-323.

  • Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.

  • Audette, L. M., Hammond, M. S., & Rochester, N. K. (2020). Methodological issues with coding participants in anonymous psychological longitudinal studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(1), 163-185.

  • Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2011). Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 282-294.

  • Babin, B., & Zikmund, W. (2016). Exploring marketing research.

  • Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269.

  • Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189-206.

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy.

  • Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1979). Interrelations among models for the analysis of moment structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(2), 169-186.

  • Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 45(3), 289-308.

  • Bharadwaja, M., & Tripathi, N. (2020). Linking empowering leadership and job attitudes: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Asia Business Studies.

  • Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19-35.

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.

  • Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15.

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571.

  • Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Selfleadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower.

  • Chen, A. S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.

  • Chen, Y., Fay, S., & Wang, Q. (2011). The role of marketing in social media: How online consumer reviews evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 85-94.

  • Clark, R. A., Hartline, M. D., & Jones, K. C. (2009). The effects of leadership style on hotel employees’ commitment to service quality. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(2), 209-231.

  • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27.

  • De Klerk, S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership empowerment behaviour, work engagement and turnover intention: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 5(3), 28-45.

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Selfdetermination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43.

  • Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2009). Empowering behaviour and leader fairness and integrity: Studying perceptions of ethical leader behaviour from a levels-of-analysis perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 199-230.

  • Dik, B. J., Steger, M. F., Fitch-Martin, A. R., & Onder, C. C. (2013). Cultivating meaningfulness at work. In The Experience of Meaning in Life (pp. 363-377). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2011). Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: Does it work? The American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 23-47.

  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155-187.

  • Gregory, B. T., Albritton, M. D., & Osmonbekov, T. (2010). The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationships between P–O fit, job satisfaction, and in-role performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 639-647.

  • Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2-3), 415-424.

  • Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268.

  • Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.

  • Jada, U. R., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Titiyal, R. (2019). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation examination. Journal of Knowledge Management.

  • Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 573-579.

  • Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a predictor of employee engagement: An empirical attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1), 93-104.

  • Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2015). Relationships among perceived supervisor support, psychological empowerment and employee engagement in Indian workplaces. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 30(3), 231-250.

  • Jyoti, J., & Dev, M. (2015). The impact of transformational leadership on employee creativity: The role of learning orientation. Journal of Asia Business Studies.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.

  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond selfmanagement: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(4), 343-364.

  • Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301-313.

  • Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 79-102.

  • Macsinga, I., Sulea, C., Sârbescu, P., Fischmann, G., & Dumitru, C. (2015). Engaged, committed and helpful employees: The role of psychological empowerment. The Journal of Psychology, 149(3), 263-276.

  • Masood, M., & Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff. Nursing Inquiry, 24(4).

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.

  • Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2012). Empowerment—fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1231-1281.

  • Mendes, F., & Stander, M. W. (2011). Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 1-13.

  • Meng, Q., & Sun, F. (2019). The impact of psychological empowerment on work engagement among university faculty members in China. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 983.

  • Merry, L. Z., & Syarief, F. (2017). The effect of empowerment, employee engagement and organizational commitment towards performance of governmental-employees of financial-management. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 1(1), 152-163.

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. (1999). The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 27(1), 45-45.

  • Odoardi, C., Montani, F., Boudrias, J. S., & Battistelli, A. (2015). Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior: The role of group and psychological processes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36, 545-569.

  • Palmer, J. E., Winter, S. C., & McMahon, S. (2020). Matching anonymous participants in longitudinal research on sensitive topics: Challenges and recommendations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 80, 101794.

  • Parzefall, M. R., Seeck, H., & Leppänen, A. (2008). Employee innovativeness in organizations: A review of the antecedents. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 2(8), 165-182.

  • Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609-623.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

  • Quiñones, M., Van den Broeck, A., & De Witte, H. (2013). Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(3), 127-134.

  • Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extrarole employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743-1770.

  • Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2013). Empowerment, organizational commitment, and voice behavior in the hospitality industry: Evidence from a multinational sample. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), 136-148.

  • Rayan, A. R., Sebaie, A. S., & Ahmed, N. A. (2018). The mediating role of psychological empowerment in the relationship between the empowering leadership behavior and work engagement: A study applied on the cement sector in Upper Egypt. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(12), 18-30.

  • Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teachers innovative behavior: The mediating role of innovation climate. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1635-1641.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.

  • Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 132.

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.

  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.

  • Shamir, B. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies, 12(3), 405-424.

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482.

  • Shin, S. J. (2015). Leadership and creativity: The mechanism perspective. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt & J. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (pp. 17-30). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

  • Shukla, S., Adhikari, B., & Singh, V. (2015). Employee engagement-role of demographic variables and personality factors. Amity Global HRM Review, 5(9), 65-73.

  • Sims, H. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Company of heroes: Unleashing the power of self-leadership. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518.

  • Sonnentag, S., Wiegelmann, M., & Czink, M. (2021). Empirical approaches to address the dynamic aspects of work engagement: Study design and data analyses. In A Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Sparrowe, R. T. (1994). Empowerment in the hospitality industry: An exploration of antecedents and outcomes. Hospitality Research Journal, 17(3), 51-73.

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.

  • Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(4), 511-526.

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704.

  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.

  • Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1-8.

  • Steger, M. F., Littman-Ovadia, H., Miller, M., Menger, L., & Rothmann, S. (2013). Engaging in work even when it is meaningless: Positive affective disposition and meaningful work interact in relation to work engagement. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 348-361.

  • Støren, K. S. (2017). Exploring the dynamics of work engagement with empowering leadership as predictor: A longitudinal multi-level approach. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, 3(3).

  • Sweetman, D., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Luthans, B. C. (2011). Relationship between positive psychological capital and creative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(1), 4-13.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (vol. 5, pp. 481-498). Boston, MA: Pearson.

  • Taghipour, A., & Dezfuli, Z. K. (2013). Designing and testing a model of antecedents of work engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 149-154.

  • Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. (2006). Effects of power concepts and employee performance on managers’ empowering. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(3), 217-234.

  • Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 15-27.

  • Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: The role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review.

  • Vanichchinchai, A. (2012). The relationship between employee involvement, partnership management and supply performance: Findings from a developing country. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 157-172.

  • Vogel, D. (2018). Matching survey responses with anonymity in environments with privacy concerns: A practical guide. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

  • Wang, X. H., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 403-420.

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Baker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 345-356.

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.

  • Zheng, M. M., & Tian, V. I. (2019). Empowerment across cultures: How national culture affects structural and psychological empowerment and employee engagement. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 13(3).

  • Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Building and Developing the Organization (vol. 1, pp. 275-302).


Abstract Views: 304

PDF Views: 0




  • The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment in the Relationship between Empowering Leadership, and Engagement and Innovative Work Behaviour

Abstract Views: 304  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Neway Habtemariam Muktar
Ph.D. Candidate in Business Leadership, Addis Ababa University School of Commerce, Ethiopia
Mulugeta Gebremedhin Kassie
Assistant Professor, Addis Ababa University School of Commerce, Department of Marketing; President, Ethiopian Marketing Professionals Association (EMPA), Ethiopia

Abstract


The main purpose of this study is to examine the influence of empowering leadership on employee innovative work behaviour and work engagement, which is mediated by psychological empowerment. The data were collected from 1,232 employees and 232 supervisors of 18 banks in Ethiopia. Reliability is assessed using Cronbach alpha; to asses validity we employed a structural equation modelling procedure using EQS 6.2. To test the hypothesis, multiple hierarchical regressions and PROCESS-macro model 4 were used. The findings suggest that: there is a positive relationship between empowering leadership and innovative work behaviour. Nevertheless, empowering leadership does not affect work engagement unless mediated by psychological empowerment. Meanwhile, empowering leadership significantly affects psychological empowerment. There is a positive influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behaviour and work engagement, and psychological empowerment mediates the indirect relationships between empowering leadership and the outcome variables, innovative work behaviour and work engagement. This study provides theoretical enrichment from the aspect of empowering leadership, and practically recommends that leaders can increase employee innovativeness and engagement by creating a work environment which ensures that employees feel empowered psychologically.

Keywords


Empowering Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, Innovative Work Behaviour, Work Engagement

References