International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Leading to the Success: Assessing the Impact of Leadership Skill of Project Managers on Success of a Software Project


Affiliations
1 Galgotias Business School, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 ValueLabs, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Software projects are getting complex and dynamic in the current global scenario and consequently understanding the factors which affect the success of such complex projects becomes critical. The impact of leadership styles of the project managers on the success of the software projects is considered for this study. This study compares the differences in the impact generated by task-oriented leadership, relationoriented leadership, change-oriented leadership, and boundary-spanning leadership on the success of the software project. ANOVA was applied to compare the difference among the four leadership styles exhibited by project manager in bringing success to the software project. The result of the study shows that Task Behaviours, Relation Behaviours, Change Behaviours, and Boundary-spanning Behaviours aspects of leadership exhibited by project manager are significantly different from each other. The mean of relationship behaviour is significantly different from that of other three-task behaviour, change behaviour, and boundary spanning behaviour; the mean of task behaviour is significantly different from that of change and boundary spanning behaviours and the mean of change and boundary spanning behaviour is not significantly different from each other. The data were collected from 150 respondents; the size of data can be increased for better result. Thus the result of the study emphasizes the use of people skill by the project manager.

Keywords

Software Project Success, Leadership Quality, Task Behaviours, Relation Behaviours, Change Behaviours, Boundary-Spanning Behaviours.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demographyand design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.

  • Arnold, G. E. (2008). Examining the relationship between leadership style and project success in virtual projects. Dissertation abstracts international, 70(01), 150. (UMI no: 3345049)

  • Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Leadership models, methods, and applications. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 277- 307). Noboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Bakhsheshi, A. H. F., & . Nejad, S. R. (2011). Impact of Project Managers' Personalities on Project Success in Four Types of Project. 2nd International Conference on Construction and Project Management IPEDR vol.15 (2011). IACSIT Press, Singapore 181.

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire, Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 207-218.

  • Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288-307.

  • Brown, O. (2008). Business and it leaders' behaviorial affects on alignment and project outcome: A comparative leadership study. Dissertation.

  • Clark, K. E., & Clarck, M. B. (1990). Measures of Leadership.Creensboro, NC: CCL.

  • Conger. & Kanungo. (1988). The Empowerment Process - Integrating Thery and Practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3).

  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-90.

  • Erdem, F., & Ozen, J. (2003). Cognitive and effective dimensions of trust indeveloping team performance. Team Performance Management, 9(5/6), 131-135.

  • Ervall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Mangement, 7, 17-26.

  • Foels , R., Driskell, J. E., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group mem ber satisfaction: An integration. small group research, 31, 676. Retrieved from www.sagepub.com/gastilstudy/ articles/.../Foels_Driskell_Mullen_Salas.pd...

  • Gil, F., Ares, A., & Barrasa, A. (2003). Direccion yliderazgo organizacional: gestion y cambio [Management and Organizational Leadership: Administration and Change]. Encuentrosen Psicología Social, 5, 95-100.

  • Gouws, J., & Gouws, L. E. ( 2004). Fundamentals of software engineering project management. Published by Melikon Pvt Ltd.

  • Jablokow, K. W., Jablokow, A. G., & Seasock, C. T. (2010). IT leadership from a problem solving perspective. Information Technology and Management, 11, 107-122. DOI 10.1007/s10799-010-0071-4.

  • Korrapati, R., & Rapaka, S. R. (2009). Successful Leadership Styles in Software Projects in Offshore Centers in India. Las Vegas, Proceedings of the Academy of Information and Management Sciences, 13(2).

  • Kumar, M. (2007). All engineers need leadership skills. Retrieved from: http://toostep.com/insight/ all-engineers-need-leadership-skills.

  • Malach-Pines, A., Dvir, D., & Sadeh, A. (2009). Project manager-project (PM-P) fit and project success. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(3), 268-291.

  • Munduate, L., & Medina, F. J. (2004). Power, Authority and Leadership. In Ch. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Nasir, Mohd H. N., & Sahibuddin, S. (2011). Critical success factors for software projects: A comparative study. Scientific Research and Essays, May, 6(10), 2174-2186. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals. org/SRE ISSN 1992-2248 ©2011 Academic Journals.

  • Neumeyer, W. (2012). Leadership for Engineers Auxilium, Inc Retrieved from: www.auxilium-inc. com/leadership-for-engineers/.

  • Oz, E., & Sosik, J. J. (2000). Why information systems projects are abandoned: A leadership. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(1), 66. ABI/ INFORM Global.

  • Rajagopalan, S. (2009). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles of information systems project managers in virtual teams. Dissertation, Capella University.

  • Randeree, K., & Ninan, M. (2011). Leadership and teams in business: A study of IT projects in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of ManagingProjects in Business, 4(1), 28-48. Emerald Group Publishing Limited1753-8378DOI 10.1108/17538371111096872.

  • Shore, B. (2005). Failure Rates in Global IS Projects and the Leadership Challenge. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(3). ABI/ INFORM Global pg. 1

  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz S. E. (2010). Psychology and work today: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. 10th edition, Pearson.

  • Smith, J. (2007). Engineering project management. Retrieved from http://www.auxilium-inc.com/ engineering-project-mgmt/.

  • Thamhain, H. (2008). Team leadership effectiveness in technology-based project environments. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 165-180.

  • Thite, M. (2009). Leadership: A critical success factor in IT project management. Retrieved from http://spiral. kaist.ac.kr/courses/2009/fall/ICE0538/Reading. Materials/Thite_leadership_critical.pdf, IEEE

  • Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77-99.

  • Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. (4th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

  • Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half centuryof behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1). 15-32.


Abstract Views: 440

PDF Views: 2




  • Leading to the Success: Assessing the Impact of Leadership Skill of Project Managers on Success of a Software Project

Abstract Views: 440  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Nidhi S. Natrajan
Galgotias Business School, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Tuhin Chattopadhyay
ValueLabs, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract


Software projects are getting complex and dynamic in the current global scenario and consequently understanding the factors which affect the success of such complex projects becomes critical. The impact of leadership styles of the project managers on the success of the software projects is considered for this study. This study compares the differences in the impact generated by task-oriented leadership, relationoriented leadership, change-oriented leadership, and boundary-spanning leadership on the success of the software project. ANOVA was applied to compare the difference among the four leadership styles exhibited by project manager in bringing success to the software project. The result of the study shows that Task Behaviours, Relation Behaviours, Change Behaviours, and Boundary-spanning Behaviours aspects of leadership exhibited by project manager are significantly different from each other. The mean of relationship behaviour is significantly different from that of other three-task behaviour, change behaviour, and boundary spanning behaviour; the mean of task behaviour is significantly different from that of change and boundary spanning behaviours and the mean of change and boundary spanning behaviour is not significantly different from each other. The data were collected from 150 respondents; the size of data can be increased for better result. Thus the result of the study emphasizes the use of people skill by the project manager.

Keywords


Software Project Success, Leadership Quality, Task Behaviours, Relation Behaviours, Change Behaviours, Boundary-Spanning Behaviours.

References