International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Servant Leadership and Commitment:Role of Transformational Leadership


Affiliations
1 Tata Consultancy Services, India
2 Center for Oneness & Transforming Leadership, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Leadership styles have been found to impact followers' affective and normative commitment. The purpose of this study is to analyse the mediating and moderating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between servant leadership and followers' affective and normative commitment. Data were collected from 105 employees (49 male, 56 female) of various IT firms located in India. The respondents were asked to rate their supervisor's servant leadership and transformational leadership, and their own affective and normative commitment. Results show that transformational leadership fully mediated the relationship between servant leadership and follower's affective and normative commitment. We also found that servant leadership enhances followers' affective and normative commitment only when transformational leadership is low. A practical implication of the study is that displaying characteristics of servant leadership would be a good start for any leader-follower relationship and for making it more transformational. Once the leader is seen as highly transformational, servant leadership may not enhance followers' affective and normative commitment after that. This study adds to the existing literature by checking for both moderation and mediation by transformational leadership in the relationship between servant leadership and followers' affective and normative commitment.

Keywords

Transformational Leadership, Servant Leadership, Organisational Commitment.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration reviewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 199-218

  • Barbuto, J. E., Jr., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31 (3), 300-326.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press

  • Bass, B. M. (1994). Transformational leadership and team and organizational decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessment of Bass’s 1985 conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468–478.

  • Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1999). The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 397-421.

  • Choong, Y., Wong, K., & Lau, T. (2012). Organizational commitment: An empirical investigation on the academician of Malaysian private universities. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2), 51-64.

  • Del, M. R. A., & Akbarpour, M. (2011). The relationship between servant leadership of managers and employees trust. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(6), 525-537.

  • Ebener, R. D., & O’Connell, J. D. (2010). How might servant leadership work. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(3), 315-335.

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. The Robert K. Greenleaf Center, Indianapolis.

  • Hartog, D. N. D., Muijen, J. J., & Koopman, V. (1997). Transactional vs. transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 19-34.

  • Hasan, S. A., & Subhani, M. I. (2011). Managerial social wisdom: A major facet for employee turnover intentions, work commitments and manager-subordinate relationships. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 40, 132-137.

  • Hoveida, R., Salari, S., & Asemi, A. (2011). A study on the relationship among servant leadership (SL) and the organizational commitment (OC): A case study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(3), 499-509.

  • Jaramillo, F., Grisaffe, D. B., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2009). Examining the impact of servant leadership on sales force performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(3), 257-275.

  • Jaramillo, F., Grisaffe, D. B., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2009). Examining the impact of servant leadership on salesperson’s turnover intention. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29 (4), 351-365.

  • Jones, D. (2012a). Servant leadership’s impact on profit, employee satisfaction, and empowerment within the framework of a participative culture in business. Business Studies Journal, 4 (1), 35-49.

  • Jones, D. (2012b). Does servant leadership lead to greater customer focus and employee satisfaction?. Business Studies Journal, 4 (2), 21-35.

  • Joo, B., Yoon, H. J., & Jeung, C. (2012). The effects of core self-evaluations and transformational leadership on organizational commitment. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 33(6), 564-582.

  • Krishnan, V. R. (2001). Value systems of transformational leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22 (3), 126–132.

  • Lauture, R., Amewokunu, Y., Lewis, S., and LawsonBody, A. (2012). Impact of culture on the organizational commitment of public-sector employees in Haiti. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11(3), 331-342.

  • Leban, W., & Zulauf, C. (2004). Linking emotional intelligence abilities and transformational leadership styles. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 25(7), 554-564.

  • Loganathan, N., & Krishnan, V. R. (2010). Leader’s femininity and transformational leadership: Mediating role of leader’s emotional intelligence. Great Lakes Herald, 4 (2), 53-72.

  • Melchar, D. E., & Bosco, S. M. (2010). Achieving high organization performance through servant leadership. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 9(1), 74-88.

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

  • Polychroniou, P. V. (2009). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership of supervisors - The impact of team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 15 (7/8), 343-356.

  • Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: developing a practical model. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 23 (3), 145-157.

  • Savage-Austin, A. R., & Honeycutt, A. (2011). Servant leadership: A phenomenological study of practices, experiences, organizational effectiveness, and barriers. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(1), 49-54.

  • Schneider, S. K., & George, W. M. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 32 (1), 60-77.

  • Singh, N., & Krishnan, V. R. (2007). Transformational leadership in India: Developing and validating a new scale using grounded theory approach. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 7(2), 219-236.

  • Singh, N., & Krishnan, V. R. (2008). Self-sacrifice and transformational leadership: Mediating role of altruism. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 261–274.

  • Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361.

  • Tsai, M., & Huang, C. (2008). The relationship among ethical climate types, facets of job satisfaction, and the three components of organizational commitment: A study of nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 565-581.

  • Yusuf, C. (2010). The effects of servant leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment in primary schools in Turkey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(3), 301-317.

  • Zhang, Y., Lin, T., & Foo, S. F. (2012). Servant leadership: A preferred style of school leadership in Singapore. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 369-383.


Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 0




  • Servant Leadership and Commitment:Role of Transformational Leadership

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abirami Muthia
Tata Consultancy Services, India
Venkat R. Krishnan
Center for Oneness & Transforming Leadership, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Leadership styles have been found to impact followers' affective and normative commitment. The purpose of this study is to analyse the mediating and moderating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between servant leadership and followers' affective and normative commitment. Data were collected from 105 employees (49 male, 56 female) of various IT firms located in India. The respondents were asked to rate their supervisor's servant leadership and transformational leadership, and their own affective and normative commitment. Results show that transformational leadership fully mediated the relationship between servant leadership and follower's affective and normative commitment. We also found that servant leadership enhances followers' affective and normative commitment only when transformational leadership is low. A practical implication of the study is that displaying characteristics of servant leadership would be a good start for any leader-follower relationship and for making it more transformational. Once the leader is seen as highly transformational, servant leadership may not enhance followers' affective and normative commitment after that. This study adds to the existing literature by checking for both moderation and mediation by transformational leadership in the relationship between servant leadership and followers' affective and normative commitment.

Keywords


Transformational Leadership, Servant Leadership, Organisational Commitment.

References