International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Political Leaders and Marketing:A Brand Identity Study


Affiliations
1 University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Brands are powerful determinants of success. It is unsurprising to see how branding tools and processes are employed in political context. Notwithstanding the differences, the exchange, choice and discrimination between competing candidates makes the political arena similar to marketing in general. A democratic form of governance enjoys several similarities with competition. The Indian political space is highly divided and fragmented based on voter demographics and psychology. In sync with market reality, the political players are also highly diversified. In the next general elections, the most dominant voting group is going to be the youth segment often called 'now generation'. Change is also visible in the political leadership of two major national parties. The competing leaders Narendra Modi of the BJP and Rahul Gandhi of the Congress have a brand building is task in their hands. The first question in brand building is to understand what the brand stands for. This study explores the identity of these two leaders by applying content analysis to their communication. It is interesting to find that both brands are driven by a dominant discourse on change, but seem to adopt different routes to achieving the same.

Keywords

Political Marketing, Brand Identity, Democracy, Competition, Brand Image.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaker, D. A. (2011). Brand relevance: Making competitors irrelevant. SF, CA, Jossey- Bass.

  • Aaker, D. A. (2002). Building srong brands. London, En gland: Simon & Schuster.

  • Shama, A. (1975). An analysis of political marketing, in Broadening the Concept of Consumer Behavior, eds. Gerald Zaltman and Brian Sternthal, Cincinnati, OH : Association for Consumer Research, pp. 106-116.

  • Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, p. 5

  • Becker, G. S. (1958). Competition and democracy. Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 105-109

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39, 32-39.

  • Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research, Nurse Education Today, 11, 461-66.

  • Caves, R. E., & Williamson, P. J. (1985). What is product differentiation, really? Journal of Industrial Economics, (34),113–32.

  • Committee on Definitions. (1960). Marketing defi nitions: A glossary of marketing terms. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

  • Dev, M. S., & Venkatanarayana, M. (2011). Youth Employment and Uemployment in India. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, p. 9.

  • Dey, I. (1996). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientist. Rutledge, London.

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper, New York.

  • Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications and issues. Healthcare for Women International, 13, 313-321.

  • Frey, B. S. (1970). Models of perfect competition and pure democracy. Kyklos, 23, 736–755.

  • Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955).The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review, 33, 33-39.

  • Griffith, Tom (2000). Plato: The Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.

  • Kapferer, J. N. (1997). Strategic Brand Management, Great Britain, Kogan Page.

  • Kavanagh, D. (1995). Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics. Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10-15

  • Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12.

  • Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. New Delhi, Pearson Education.

  • Krppendroff, F. N. (1980). Practice of Social Research: Social Work Perspective, London, Sage.

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Leites, N. (1965). Language of Politics, Cambridge, MIT Press.

  • Lovelock, C., & Weinberg. (1978). Public and non-profit marketing comes of age. Review of Marketing, 416-26.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

  • Nachmias, D., & Nachmias, C. (2008). Content analysis in research methods in the social sciences, New York, Worth Publishers. Report of Working Group on Adolescent and Youth Development, Deptt. of Youth Affairs, M/o YA&S for formulation of 12 Five Year Plan (2012-17), Government of India, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports Department of Youth Affairs, October, 2011.p. 1

  • Ries, Al., & Trout, J. (1982). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York, Warner Books.

  • Schumpeter, J. (1947). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York.

  • Schmmell, M. (2007). Political brands and consumer citizens: the rebranding of tony blair. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 176-92.

  • Schneider, M. (2007). Branding in Politics-Manifestations, Relevance, and Identity Oriented Management. Journal of Political Marketing, 3( 3), 41-67.

  • Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • White, J., & de Chernatony, L. (2002). New labour: A study of creation, development & demise of a political brand. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(2/3).


Abstract Views: 401

PDF Views: 0




  • Political Leaders and Marketing:A Brand Identity Study

Abstract Views: 401  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Harsh V. Verma
University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Brands are powerful determinants of success. It is unsurprising to see how branding tools and processes are employed in political context. Notwithstanding the differences, the exchange, choice and discrimination between competing candidates makes the political arena similar to marketing in general. A democratic form of governance enjoys several similarities with competition. The Indian political space is highly divided and fragmented based on voter demographics and psychology. In sync with market reality, the political players are also highly diversified. In the next general elections, the most dominant voting group is going to be the youth segment often called 'now generation'. Change is also visible in the political leadership of two major national parties. The competing leaders Narendra Modi of the BJP and Rahul Gandhi of the Congress have a brand building is task in their hands. The first question in brand building is to understand what the brand stands for. This study explores the identity of these two leaders by applying content analysis to their communication. It is interesting to find that both brands are driven by a dominant discourse on change, but seem to adopt different routes to achieving the same.

Keywords


Political Marketing, Brand Identity, Democracy, Competition, Brand Image.

References