Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Analysis between Small and Medium Scale Manufacturing Company through Total Quality Management Techniques


Affiliations
1 Balaji Engineering College, Junagadh (Gujarat) 362014, India
2 Institute of Technology & Management, Gwalior (M.P.) 474001, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objective is strategic goal, set by the organization through its strategic planning process for attainment of vision in larger frame of the future. Today, find much literature which abounds with case studies of successful companies, descriptions of quality concepts, and quality improvement approaches. However, most of this literature is rather weak in providing benchmark data or a framework that managers can use to evaluate and modify their own quality improvement efforts. This framework is important because it can be used to assess the status of quality practices in organizations and guide managers in their quality improvement initiatives, without being dependent on outside consultants. It is also useful in providing initial benchmark data about the strengths and weaknesses that exist within the firm in the process of pursuing a quality improvement program. Smaller firms are likely to face more risk in attempting technological or organizational change. Because large and medium companies can assess greater resources, they are more likely to survive a stumble when adopting a new technology or trying a new management concept such as TQM. Consequently, this causes smaller firms to place great importance on "doing it right the first time." They may not get a second chance. It is also helped small and medium size enterprises--would be able to design and implement their own less expensive and easy to follow TQM criteria, which ultimately will produce competent internal results for their company.

In this respect, primary objective of TQM can be simply states as to ensure 'Performance Superiority' of the company over competitors by delivering total customer satisfaction.

Secondary objectives of TQM are-

1. Continuous improvement of the organizational processes and output, which must be equal or superior to the competition

2. Continual and relentless cost reduction and value addition to products and services

3. Continuous and relentless thrust for improvement of manufacturing processes, product and services

4. Creation of an organizational work culture where by everyone is involved in the process of customer satisfaction and value creation for its customers

5. Making the organization market and customer focused

6. Guiding the organization its values, vision, mission and goal set through 'strategic planning' process

7. Changing the organization from 'function' focused to 'customer' focused, where customer's priorities come first in all activities

8. Making the organization flexible and learning oriented to cope with change; change in market place,business-environment, opportunities for improvements as well as organizational culture

9. Creating an organization where people are at the core of every activity, and are encouraged and empowered to work in teams

10. Promoting a transparent leadership process to lead the organization to excellence in its chosen field of business


Keywords

TQM, Process Chart, Control Chart, Flow Chart, Pareto Chart
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahire, S.L., & Golhar, D.Y. (2001). Quality management in large versus small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 27, 1–13.
  • Ahire, L.S., Golhar, D.Y., & Waller, M.A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27, 23–56.
  • Ahire, S.L., Landeros, R., & Golhar, D.Y. (1995). Total quality management: A literature review and an agenda for future research. Production and Operations Management, 4(3), 277–306.
  • Ahmed, P.K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30–43.
  • Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
  • Anderson, J.C., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R.G. (1994). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472–509.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Market orientation and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 93–103.
  • Badri, M.A., Davis, D., & Davis, D. (1995). A study of measuring the critical factors of quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2(2), 36–53.
  • Baldwin, J.R., & Johnson, J. (1996). Business strategies in more and lessinnovative firms in Canada. Research Policy, 25(5), 785–804.
  • Beaumont, N.B., & Sohal, A.S. (1999). Quality management in Australian service industries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 6(2), 107–124.
  • Beaumont, N.B., Sohal, A.S., & Terziovski, M. (1997). Comparing quality management practices in the Australian service and manufacturing industries. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 14(8), 814–833.
  • Black, A.S., & Porter, L.J. (1996). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1–21.
  • Carr, A.S., Leong, G.K., & Sheu, C. (2000). A study of purchasing practices in Taiwan. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(12), 1427–1445.
  • Choong, Y.L. (2004). Perception and development of total quality management in small manufacturers: An exploratory study in China. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 102–115.
  • Crosby, P.B. (1979). Quality is free. New York: McGraw-Hill. Crosby, P.B. (1996). Quality is still free: Making quality certain in uncertain times. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Das, A., Paul, H., Swiersek, F.W., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2006). A measurement instrument for TQM implementation in the Thai manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 3(4), 1–17.
  • Dean, J.W., & Bowen, D.E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418.
  • Dean, J., & Evans, J. (1994). Total quality management, organization and strategy. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  • Deming, W.E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  • Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  • Dow, D., Swanson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management, 8(1), 1–27.
  • Evans, J., & Lindsay, W. (1993). The management and control of quality (2nd ed.). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  • Feigenbaum, A.V. (1951). Quality control: Principles, practice, and administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Feigenbaum, A.V. (1983). Quality control (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Feigenbaum, A.V. (1991). Total quality control, 40th anniversary edition (3 rev ed.).New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Feng, J., Prajogo, D.I., Tan, K.C., & Sohal, A.S. (2006). The impact of TQM practices on performance: A comparative study between Australian and Singaporean organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), 269–278.
  • Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G., & Sakakibara, S. (1994). A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operational Management,11, 339–366.
  • Gagnon, T., & Toulouse, J. (1996). The behavior of business managers when adopting new technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 52, 59–74.
  • GAO Study (1991). Report to the House of Representatives on Management Practices, US Companies Improve Performance through Quality Efforts. United States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
  • Garvin, D.A. (1988). Managing quality: The strategic and competitive edge. New York: The Free Press.
  • Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption. Journal of Business Research, 35, 117–127.
  • Grant, R.M., Shani, R., & Krishnan, R. (1994). TQM’s challenge to management theory and practice. Sloan Management Review, 35(2), 25–35.
  • Haar, J.M., & Spell, C.S. (2008). Predicting total quality management adoption in New Zealand: The moderating effect of organizational size. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(2), 162–178.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Inc.
  • Hoang, D.T., Igel, B., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2006). The impact of total quality management on innovation: Findings from a developing country. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(9), 1092–1117.
  • Hui, M.K., Au, K., & Fock, H. (2004). Empowerment effects across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 46–60.
  • Hung, B.N. (2003). Assesement the effect of ISO certificate on performance of companies in Hochiminh City. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Department of Science, Technology, and Environment, HCMC.
  • Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Joseph, I.N., Rajendran, C., & Kamalanabhan, T.J. (1999). An instrument for measuring total quality management implementation in manufacturing-based business units in India. Internal Journal of Production Research, 37, 2201– 2215.
  • Juran, J.M. (1974). Quality control handbook (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • Juran, J.M. (1988). Juran on planning for quality. New York: Free Press.
  • Juran, J.M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality: an executive handbook. New York: Free Press.
  • Juran, J.M. (1992). Juran on quality by design: The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. New York: Free Press.
  • Juran, J.M. (1995). A history of managing for quality: The evolution, trends and future direction of managing for quality. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
  • Kim, W.C., & Marbougne, R. (1999). Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan Management Review, (Spring), 41–54.
  • Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kruger, V. (1996). How can a company achieve improved levels of quality performance: Technology versus employees? The TQM Magazine, 8(3), 11– 20.
  • Kruger, V. (1998). Total quality management and its humanistic orientation towards organizational analysis. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 293–301.
  • Kruger, V. (2001). Main schools of TQM: ‘the big five’. The TQM Magazine, 13(3), 146–155.
  • Laosirihongthong, T, Paul, H., & Speece, M.W. (2003). Evaluation of new manufacturing technology implementation: And empirical study in the Thai automotive industry. Technovation, 23, 321–331.
  • Loan, N.T.Q. (2004). Assesment of the quality management system of ISO companies. Economic Development Review, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, No. 8–9.
  • McAdam, R., Armstrong, G., & Kelly, B. (1998). Investigation of the relationship between total quality and innovation: A research study involving small organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(3), 139– 147.
  • Millar, R.M.G. (1987). In foreword to J. Cullen & J. Hollingham. Implementing total quality. Bedford: IFS Publications.
  • Ministry of Planning and Investment. (1999). Research report: Improving macroeconomic policy and reforming administrative procedures to promote development of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam.
  • Motwani, J. (2001). Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM Magazine, 13(4), 292–300.
  • Noronha, C. (2002). Chinese cultural values and total quality climate. Managing Service Quality, 12(4), 210–223.
  • Nunnally, J., & Burnstein, I.H. (1994). Pschychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Pinho, J.C. (2008). TQM and performance in small medium enterprises: The mediating effect of customer orientation and innovation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(3), 256–275.
  • Powell, T.C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15–37.
  • Power, D.J., Amrik, S.S., & Rahman, S. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 31(4), 247–265.
  • Prajogo, D.I. (2005). The comparative analysis of TQM practices and quality performance between manufacturing and service firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3), 217–228.
  • Prajogo, D.I., & Sohal, A.S. (2003a). The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance – an empirical examination. Technovation, 24, 443–453.
  • Prajogo, D.I., & Sohal, A.S. (2003b). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918.
  • Prajogo, D.I., & Sohal, A.S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology /R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. The International Journal of Management
  • Science, Omega, 34, 296–312.
  • Pun, K.F. (2001). Cultural influences of TQM adoption in Chinese enterprises: An empirical study. Total Quality Management, 12(3), 323–342.
  • Rahman, S., & Bullock, P. (2005). Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationship: An empirical investigation. Omega, 33, 73–83.
  • Reed, R., Lemark, D.J., & Mero, N.P. (2000). Total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 5–26.
  • Samson, D., & Terziovski, M. (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 17, 393–409.
  • Saraph, J.V., Benson, G.P., & Schroeder, R.G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20, 810–829.
  • Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002). An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000 – a literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 902–970. 950.
  • Silvestro, R. (1998). The manufacturing TQM and service quality literatures: Synergistic or conflicting paradigms? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(3), 303–328.
  • Singh, P.J., & Smith, A.F.R. (2004). Relationship between TQM and innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 394–401.
  • Sitkin, S.B., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Schroeder, R.G. (1994). Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 537–564.
  • Slater, S.F., & Narver, J.C. (1998). Customer-led and market-led: Let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001–1006.
  • Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the work place: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
  • Steingrad, D.S., & Fitzgibbons, D.E. (1993). A postmodern deconstruction of total quality management. Journal of Organization Change Management, 6(5), 27–42.
  • Sureshchandar, G.S., Chandrasekharan, R., & Anantharaman, R.N. (2001). A conceptual model for total quality management in service organizations. Total quality management, 12(3), 343–363.
  • Swamidass, P.M., & Kotha, S. (1998). Explaining manufacturing technology use firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology. Journal of Operation Management, 17, 23–37.
  • Terziovski, M., & Samson, D. (1999). The link between total quality management practice and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16(3), 226–237.
  • Terziovski, M., & Samson, D. (2000). The effect of company size on the relationship between TQM strategy and organizational performance. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 144–148.
  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Vuppalapati, K., Ahire, S.L., & Gupta, T. (1995). JIT and TQM: A case for joint implementation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(5), 84–94.
  • Watson, J.G., & Korukonda, A.R. (1995). The TQM jungle: A dialectical analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(9), 100–109.
  • Wind, J., & Mahajan, V. (1997). Issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 1–12.
  • Woon, K.C. (2000). TQM implementation: comparing Singapore’s service and manufacturing leaders. Managing Service Quality, 10(5), 318–331.
  • Yavas, B.F., & Rezayat, F. (2003). The impact of culture on managerial perceptions of quality. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(2), 213–234.
  • Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L.L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: Free Press.
  • Zeitz, G., Johannesson, R., & Ritchie, J.E. Jr. (1997). An employee survey measuring total quality management practices and culture. Group and Organization Management, 22(4), 414–444.
  • www.slais.ubc.ca/people/students/resumes/C_Payne/media_pdf/TQMTools.pd f
  • www.work911.com/articles/tqm1.htm
  • www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/dstools/represent/tqm.htm
  • www.qualityoasis.comcontentview3131
  • www.bpir.com/total-quality-management-history-of-tqm-and-businessexcellence-bpir.com.html

Abstract Views: 915

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Analysis between Small and Medium Scale Manufacturing Company through Total Quality Management Techniques

Abstract Views: 915  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mohammad Israr
Balaji Engineering College, Junagadh (Gujarat) 362014, India
Anshul Gangele
Institute of Technology & Management, Gwalior (M.P.) 474001, India

Abstract


Objective is strategic goal, set by the organization through its strategic planning process for attainment of vision in larger frame of the future. Today, find much literature which abounds with case studies of successful companies, descriptions of quality concepts, and quality improvement approaches. However, most of this literature is rather weak in providing benchmark data or a framework that managers can use to evaluate and modify their own quality improvement efforts. This framework is important because it can be used to assess the status of quality practices in organizations and guide managers in their quality improvement initiatives, without being dependent on outside consultants. It is also useful in providing initial benchmark data about the strengths and weaknesses that exist within the firm in the process of pursuing a quality improvement program. Smaller firms are likely to face more risk in attempting technological or organizational change. Because large and medium companies can assess greater resources, they are more likely to survive a stumble when adopting a new technology or trying a new management concept such as TQM. Consequently, this causes smaller firms to place great importance on "doing it right the first time." They may not get a second chance. It is also helped small and medium size enterprises--would be able to design and implement their own less expensive and easy to follow TQM criteria, which ultimately will produce competent internal results for their company.

In this respect, primary objective of TQM can be simply states as to ensure 'Performance Superiority' of the company over competitors by delivering total customer satisfaction.

Secondary objectives of TQM are-

1. Continuous improvement of the organizational processes and output, which must be equal or superior to the competition

2. Continual and relentless cost reduction and value addition to products and services

3. Continuous and relentless thrust for improvement of manufacturing processes, product and services

4. Creation of an organizational work culture where by everyone is involved in the process of customer satisfaction and value creation for its customers

5. Making the organization market and customer focused

6. Guiding the organization its values, vision, mission and goal set through 'strategic planning' process

7. Changing the organization from 'function' focused to 'customer' focused, where customer's priorities come first in all activities

8. Making the organization flexible and learning oriented to cope with change; change in market place,business-environment, opportunities for improvements as well as organizational culture

9. Creating an organization where people are at the core of every activity, and are encouraged and empowered to work in teams

10. Promoting a transparent leadership process to lead the organization to excellence in its chosen field of business


Keywords


TQM, Process Chart, Control Chart, Flow Chart, Pareto Chart

References