Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recognition of Respiratory Health Problems among Health Care Professionals Exposed to Fumigation- a Descriptive Survey


Affiliations
1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
2 MCON, Manipal University, Manipal, India
3 Pulmonary Medicine department, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
4 Pulmonary Medicine Department, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
5 KMC, Pulmonary Medicine Department Manipal University, Manipal, India
6 Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, India
7 Department of Pharmacology, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
8 Department of Statistics, Manipal University, Manipal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Out of the 115 health care professionals who were randomly selected, it was observed that most 95.7 % had been exposed directly or indirectly to fumigation. Majority 61 (53%) had been working in area for more than 5 years. Most 95.7% of these staff carried out fumigation as part of their responsibility in their respective unit. Majority, 60 (52.5%) had been exposed to fumigation more than 16 times and more. It was also noticed that majority, 60% of them had respiratory symptoms - cough was reported by 73.9 %, eye irritation 53%, nasal symptom 22.6%, wheezing 13.9%, Breathlessness 12.2 % and skin irritation 6.1%. Of these 60 % who had respiratory symptoms amazingly only 9.6% had reported to their physician for medical help. This clearly indicates that chemicals used for fumigation causes respiratory symptoms minor or major in nature. It is also noted that health problems are being neglected and not reported for early management or change.

Keywords

Nursing Personnel, Ot Technician, Fumigation, Respiratory Symptoms.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • P F G Gannon, P Bright, M Campbell, S P O’Hickey, P Sherwood Burge. Occupational asthma due to glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in endoscopy and x ray departments. Thorax 1995;50:156-159.
  • Vaughan WT. The practice of allergy. St. Louis: Mosby, 1939:677.
  • Babb JR, Bradley CR. Decontamination of fibre optic endoscopes: an update. J Sterile Service Management 1988; April: 222-4.
  • Health and Safety Executive. Occupational exposure limits. EH40/93. London: HMSO, 1993.
  • Norback D. Skin and respiratory symptoms from exposure to alkaline glutaraldehyde in medical services. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14:366-71.
  • Jachuck SJ, Bound CL, Steel J, Blain PG. Occupational hazard in hospital staff exposed to 2% glutaraldehyde in an endoscopy unit. J Soc Occup Med 1989; 39:69-71.
  • Hemminki K, Kyyronen P, Liisa M. Spontaneous abortions and malformations in the offspring of nurses exposed to anaesthetic gases, cytostatic drugs, and other potential hazards in hospitals, based on registered information of outcome. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1985, 39, 141-147.
  • Gannon PF, Bright P, Campbell M. Occupational asthma due to Glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in endoscopy and x ray. Thorax 1995 50: 156-159.

Abstract Views: 275

PDF Views: 0




  • Recognition of Respiratory Health Problems among Health Care Professionals Exposed to Fumigation- a Descriptive Survey

Abstract Views: 275  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. Manu Mohan
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Elsa Sanatombi Devi
MCON, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Aswini Kumar Mohapatra
Pulmonary Medicine department, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Rahul Magazine
Pulmonary Medicine Department, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Chirag A. Bhandare
KMC, Pulmonary Medicine Department Manipal University, Manipal, India
A. Yashoda
Kasturba Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, India
K. L. Bairy
Department of Pharmacology, KMC, Manipal University, Manipal, India
Sreemathi S. Mayya
Department of Statistics, Manipal University, Manipal, India

Abstract


Out of the 115 health care professionals who were randomly selected, it was observed that most 95.7 % had been exposed directly or indirectly to fumigation. Majority 61 (53%) had been working in area for more than 5 years. Most 95.7% of these staff carried out fumigation as part of their responsibility in their respective unit. Majority, 60 (52.5%) had been exposed to fumigation more than 16 times and more. It was also noticed that majority, 60% of them had respiratory symptoms - cough was reported by 73.9 %, eye irritation 53%, nasal symptom 22.6%, wheezing 13.9%, Breathlessness 12.2 % and skin irritation 6.1%. Of these 60 % who had respiratory symptoms amazingly only 9.6% had reported to their physician for medical help. This clearly indicates that chemicals used for fumigation causes respiratory symptoms minor or major in nature. It is also noted that health problems are being neglected and not reported for early management or change.

Keywords


Nursing Personnel, Ot Technician, Fumigation, Respiratory Symptoms.

References