Indian Journal of Computer Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study on Conventional Network and Software Defined Network


Affiliations
1 PG Student, Department of Information Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore - 641 004, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Assistant Professor (Sl.Gr), Department of Information Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore - 641 004, Tamil Nadu, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Software Defined Networking (SDN) is the next big technology in networking. It decouples the network control plane from the forwarding plane and it has the central controller that is programmatic. The entire network is controlled by the central controller. SDN is automated, reliable, cost-efficient, agile, and dynamic in nature. This paper reviews the study on traditional network and SDN. The comparison is based on the different protocols used, firewalls, control plane, and few other basic parameters such as reliability, vulnerability, error control, architecture, and cost parameters. As a result of comparison, it is evident that SDN is more efficient than the traditional network architecture.

Keywords

Agile, Central Controller, Control Plane, Dynamic, Error Control, Firewall, Forwarding Plane, Reliability, SDN, Networking, Vulnerability.

Manuscript Received: October 12, 2019; Revised: October 26, 2019; Accepted: November 7, 2019. Date of Publication: December 5, 2019.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 315

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Study on Conventional Network and Software Defined Network

Abstract Views: 315  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. Khavya
PG Student, Department of Information Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore - 641 004, Tamil Nadu, India
T. Vairam
Assistant Professor (Sl.Gr), Department of Information Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore - 641 004, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Software Defined Networking (SDN) is the next big technology in networking. It decouples the network control plane from the forwarding plane and it has the central controller that is programmatic. The entire network is controlled by the central controller. SDN is automated, reliable, cost-efficient, agile, and dynamic in nature. This paper reviews the study on traditional network and SDN. The comparison is based on the different protocols used, firewalls, control plane, and few other basic parameters such as reliability, vulnerability, error control, architecture, and cost parameters. As a result of comparison, it is evident that SDN is more efficient than the traditional network architecture.

Keywords


Agile, Central Controller, Control Plane, Dynamic, Error Control, Firewall, Forwarding Plane, Reliability, SDN, Networking, Vulnerability.

Manuscript Received: October 12, 2019; Revised: October 26, 2019; Accepted: November 7, 2019. Date of Publication: December 5, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs%2F2019%2Fv4%2Fi6%2F150423