Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of the Antimicrobial Resistance of Urinary Escherichia coli and Some Factors Related to Urinary Tract Infection in Karbala Patients


Affiliations
1 Assist. Prof. Dr. Jaafar Jaber, Private Sector, Ministry of Health, Iraq
2 Dr. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, College of Medicine, Kerballa University, Iraq
3 Diploma of Clinical Pharmacy, Private Sector, Ministry of Health, Iraq
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common type of infectious disease encountered in the practice of medicine. Antimicrobial resistance is huge problem cause of a great concern throughout the world. This study was curried out to assess the antimicrobial resistance of urinary E. coli and some factors related to urinary tract infection.

Results: Out of the 100 patients studied, the urine samples of 49 patients were found to have culture positive; and out of these, the urine samples of 28 patients were positive for urinary E. coli. Thus the prevalence was 57.1% for E. coli, and 42.9% for other type of bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Hemolytic streptococci, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results of sensitivity tests showed that the resistance of E. coli was about 10 times higher for nitrofurantoin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone; relative to amikacin, ampicillin and imipenem.

Aim of the Study: Assessmentof the antimicrobial resistance of urinary E. coli and some factors related to urinary tract infection in Karbala patients.

Conclusions: Escherichia coli remains the most common pathogens isolated form urine samples of patients with urinary tract infection . The resistance of uropathogenic E. coli to antimicrobial drugs has been gradually increasing for commonly used drugs.


Keywords

Karbala Patients, Escherichia coli, Antimicrobial Resistance, Factors.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 459

PDF Views: 0




  • Assessment of the Antimicrobial Resistance of Urinary Escherichia coli and Some Factors Related to Urinary Tract Infection in Karbala Patients

Abstract Views: 459  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jaafar Jaber
Assist. Prof. Dr. Jaafar Jaber, Private Sector, Ministry of Health, Iraq
Maysaloon Adnan Abdul Razzak
Dr. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, College of Medicine, Kerballa University, Iraq
Fouad Oudah Kadhim
Diploma of Clinical Pharmacy, Private Sector, Ministry of Health, Iraq

Abstract


Background: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common type of infectious disease encountered in the practice of medicine. Antimicrobial resistance is huge problem cause of a great concern throughout the world. This study was curried out to assess the antimicrobial resistance of urinary E. coli and some factors related to urinary tract infection.

Results: Out of the 100 patients studied, the urine samples of 49 patients were found to have culture positive; and out of these, the urine samples of 28 patients were positive for urinary E. coli. Thus the prevalence was 57.1% for E. coli, and 42.9% for other type of bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Hemolytic streptococci, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results of sensitivity tests showed that the resistance of E. coli was about 10 times higher for nitrofurantoin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone; relative to amikacin, ampicillin and imipenem.

Aim of the Study: Assessmentof the antimicrobial resistance of urinary E. coli and some factors related to urinary tract infection in Karbala patients.

Conclusions: Escherichia coli remains the most common pathogens isolated form urine samples of patients with urinary tract infection . The resistance of uropathogenic E. coli to antimicrobial drugs has been gradually increasing for commonly used drugs.


Keywords


Karbala Patients, Escherichia coli, Antimicrobial Resistance, Factors.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/v11%2Fi2%2F2020%2Fijphrd%2F195198