Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Evaluation of Maleic acid and EDTA as a Desmearing Agent-An In-Vitro Study


Affiliations
1 Undergraduate Student, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, TN, India
2 Reader Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, TN, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Aim: To compare the desmearing effect of 7% maleic acid with 17% EDTA on intra-radicular smear layer removal using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).

Materials and Method: Fifteen maxillary incisors were collected and decoronated. Each tooth was randomly split into 3 groups, each assigned to saline, 17% EDTA and 7% Maleic acid respectively and irrigated. Each tooth was split into halves and subjected to scanning electron microscopy for evaluation of smear layer removal.

Results: Average grading for saline was 5.16 and that of EDTA was 2.32 and Maleic acid was 3.16. Maleic acid was significantly better than saline. But maleic acid was significantly not as effective as EDTA on the smear layer removal.

Conclusion: This study proves that Maleic acid though better than saline fell short in comparison to EDTA in terms of smear layer removal. This difference in desmearing effect was significant.


Keywords

Maleic Acid, Root Canal Irrigant, Surface Roughness, Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 137

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparative Evaluation of Maleic acid and EDTA as a Desmearing Agent-An In-Vitro Study

Abstract Views: 137  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

J. Danalakshmi
Undergraduate Student, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, TN, India
S. Subash Sharma
Reader Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, TN, India

Abstract


Aim: To compare the desmearing effect of 7% maleic acid with 17% EDTA on intra-radicular smear layer removal using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).

Materials and Method: Fifteen maxillary incisors were collected and decoronated. Each tooth was randomly split into 3 groups, each assigned to saline, 17% EDTA and 7% Maleic acid respectively and irrigated. Each tooth was split into halves and subjected to scanning electron microscopy for evaluation of smear layer removal.

Results: Average grading for saline was 5.16 and that of EDTA was 2.32 and Maleic acid was 3.16. Maleic acid was significantly better than saline. But maleic acid was significantly not as effective as EDTA on the smear layer removal.

Conclusion: This study proves that Maleic acid though better than saline fell short in comparison to EDTA in terms of smear layer removal. This difference in desmearing effect was significant.


Keywords


Maleic Acid, Root Canal Irrigant, Surface Roughness, Scanning Electron Microscopy.