Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of Needle Sticks Injuries in a Medical College Hospital in Northern District of Karnataka


Affiliations
1 Department of Pathology, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Pathology, J J M Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: Healthcare workers (HCW) are prone for accidental Needle Stick Injuries. Inspite of health education and interventions for prevention, needle stick injuries are still common.

Methodology: We reviewed the surveillance data of NSI over a period of 2 years (March 2009 - Feb 2011) to identify the health groups affected, types of needles used, mechanisms of NSI, pattern of post-exposure prophylaxis and the complications.

Results: 118 HCW reported the injuries. Among them were 42 (35%) nurses, 22 (19%) nursing interns/ students, Laboratory technicians 21 (18%), Cleaning staff 14 (12%), Medical interns 12 (10%) and Doctors 07 (06%). The devices mainly responsible for Needle Stick Injuries were hollow bore needles (n=90, 78%), solid 16 (17%) and others 4 (5%). Almost all injuries were caused during blood collection procedure and de-capping or re-capping of the needles. Post exposure prophylaxis for HCW's who reported injuries was provided. Subsequent follow up for Human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus was negative except for one health care worker who was positive for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen(HBsAg).

Conclusion: Proper education and appropriate waste disposal of the sharps are necessary to prevent Needle stick Injuries.


Keywords

Needle Stick Injuries, Healthcare Workers, Universal Precautions
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Jagger J, Hunt EH , Brand- Elnaggar J, P J, Pearson RD. Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med 1988;319:284.
  • Riddell LA, Sherrard J. Blood-borne virus infection: The occupational risks. Int J STD AIDS 2000;11:632-9.
  • Gerberding JL. The infected healthcare provider. N Engl J Med 1996;334:594.
  • C porta, E. Handleman, P.McGoren Needle stick injuries among health care workers: A literature review American association of occupational health nurses Vol. 47 No.6 1999(237-243).
  • Perry J, Parker G. Jagger J, CPI net report: 2003 percutaneous injury rates. Advertise exposure prey. 2008: 7 (4): 42-45.
  • Kernode M, Jolley D, Langkam B,Thomas MS,CroftsN Occupational exposure to Blood & Risk of Bloodborne Virus Inf. Among Health care workers in Rural North Indian Health Care Settings. Am. J. Infect. Control 2005; 33: 34-41
  • Rele M, Mathur M, Turbadkar D. Risk of Needlestick injuries in Health care Workers: A Report. Ind. J. Med. Micro. 2002; 20; 206-7
  • Mehta A, Rodrigues C, Ghag s,Bavi p, Shenai S, Dastur F. Needlestick injuries in a Tertiary Care Centre in Mumbai, India. J. Hosp. Infect. 2005 ; 60 : 368-373
  • Richard VS, Kenneth J, Ramaprabha P, Kirupakaran H, Chandy GM.Impact of introduction of sharp containers and of education programmes in the pattern of needle stick injuries in a tertiary care centre in India. J. Hospital infection 2001: 47: 163-5.
  • Bairy I, Rao SP, Dey A. Exposure to blood-borne viruses among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in south India. J Postgrad Med. 2007 Oct-Dec;53(4):275-6.
  • Jayanth ST, Kirupakaran H, Brahmadathan KN, Gnanaraj L, Kang G. Needle stick injuries in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):44-7.
  • Fisman DN, Harris AD, Rubin M, Sorock GS, Mittleman MA. Fatigue increases the risk of injury from sharp devices in medical trainees: Results from a case-crossover study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:10
  • Nili T, Amal MS, Shaul SS. The health beliefs of hospital staff and the reporting of needlestick injury. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15 : 1228-39.
  • Nagao Y, Baba H, Torii K, Nagao M, Hatakeyama K, Linuma Y, et al. A long term study of sharps injuries among health care workers of Japan. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35 : 407-11.
  • Smith DR, Leggat PA. Needlestick and sharps injuries among nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51 : 449-55.
  • Alamgir H, Cvitkovich Y, Astrakianakis G,Yu S, Yassi A.Needlestick and other potential blood and body fluid exposures among health care workers in British Columbia,Canada. Am Infect Control 2008; 36:12-21
  • Haiduvas DJ, Domaid TM,Stevans DA, Five year study of needle stick injuries. Significant reduction associates with communication, education and convenient placement of sharp containers,. Infect cpntrol hospital epidemio 1992: 13: 265-7
  • Askarian M, Shaghaghian S, McLaws ML. Needlestick injuries among nurses of Fars Province, Iran. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17 : 988-92.
  • Nee L, Lim HL, Chan YH, Bachok DB. Analysis of sharps injury occurrences at a hospital in Singapore. Int J Nurs Prac 2002; 8 : 274-281
  • Sumathi Muralidhar, Prashant Kumar Singh , R.K. Jain, Meenaksh Malhotra & Manju Bala. Needle stick injuries among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital of India.;Indian J Med Res 131, March 2010, pp 405-410
  • Martin A. Makary m.d e.t al. Needle stick injuries among surgeons in training The new England journal of Medicine. Vol. 356; 2693-2699, jun 28, 2007
  • Wanchu A, single, Bambery I, Varma S. Possibly occupationally acquired HIV infection in two Indian health care workers. Med. Gen. Med 2006: 24. 8-56

Abstract Views: 700

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study of Needle Sticks Injuries in a Medical College Hospital in Northern District of Karnataka

Abstract Views: 700  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

C H Mahesh Kumar
Department of Pathology, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India
Satish L Belagatti
Department of Pathology, J J M Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Background: Healthcare workers (HCW) are prone for accidental Needle Stick Injuries. Inspite of health education and interventions for prevention, needle stick injuries are still common.

Methodology: We reviewed the surveillance data of NSI over a period of 2 years (March 2009 - Feb 2011) to identify the health groups affected, types of needles used, mechanisms of NSI, pattern of post-exposure prophylaxis and the complications.

Results: 118 HCW reported the injuries. Among them were 42 (35%) nurses, 22 (19%) nursing interns/ students, Laboratory technicians 21 (18%), Cleaning staff 14 (12%), Medical interns 12 (10%) and Doctors 07 (06%). The devices mainly responsible for Needle Stick Injuries were hollow bore needles (n=90, 78%), solid 16 (17%) and others 4 (5%). Almost all injuries were caused during blood collection procedure and de-capping or re-capping of the needles. Post exposure prophylaxis for HCW's who reported injuries was provided. Subsequent follow up for Human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus was negative except for one health care worker who was positive for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen(HBsAg).

Conclusion: Proper education and appropriate waste disposal of the sharps are necessary to prevent Needle stick Injuries.


Keywords


Needle Stick Injuries, Healthcare Workers, Universal Precautions

References