Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women and its Association with Pregnancy Outcome


Affiliations
1 Deptt. of Obst & Gynae, LLRM Medical College, Meerut, India
2 Deptt. of S.P.M. SIMS Medical College, Hapur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objective

To study the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria(ABU) in pregnant women& its association with pregnancy outcome.

Method

A Descriptive Study (Cross Section) was done in 800 antenatal women up to 28 weeks during the year 2009- 2010.Urine culture was done after recording patient obstetrical, personal, past history, clinical examination. Out of which 48 (Group-A) found having ABU (>1×105 CFU/ml), while 752(Group-B) were not having any bacteriuria. Both the Groups were further followed monthly up to delivery. At the time of delivery perinatal outcome recorded.

Result

Prevalence of ABU is 6% (48/752). E.coli (75%) was common pathogen followed by Staph.saprophyticus, Klebseilla. It is associated with increased risk of Symptomatic UTI as 12.5% bacteruric&2.93%nonbacteruric women develop symptomatic UTI(p<0.001). ABU was found to be associated with Preterm Labour as 20.83% bacteruric&4.8% non-bacteriuric women have preterm labour(p<0.044). It is also associated with Low Birth Weight babies as 16.67% in bacteriuric&6.12%non-bacteriuric women have LBW babies(p<0.049).

Conclusion

ABU is a common infection during pregnancy&it increases the risk of Preterm birth, Low birth weight babies&Symptomatic UTI.


Keywords

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria, CFU-colony Forming Unit, E.coli, Urinary Tract Infection, Preterm Labour
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Nicolle LE. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in the elderly. Infect Dis Clin N Amer 1997; 11(3): 647-62.

  • Begum N. Clinical profile of urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Mymensingh Med J. 1992; 1: 6-10.

  • Bailey RR Urinary tract infection. Can Ded Assoc. 1972; 107: 315-30.

  • Tugrul S, Oral O, Kumru P, Köse D, Alkan A, Yildirim G: Evaluation and importance of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 32: 237-40. [ Links ]

  • Joseph KS, Brahmadathan KN, Abraham S, Joseph A.Detecting bacteriuria ia a primary maternal and child health care program. Bri Med J. 1988; 296: 906-7.

  • Roony C. Antenatal care and maternal health: How effective is it? Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme, Division of Family Health, World Health Organization, 1992

  • Kass, E. H. :Ann. Int. Med. 56: 46, 1962

  • Whalley P. Bacteriuria of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967;97:723–38

  • Fatima N, Ishrat S. Frequency and risk factors of asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006; 16:273-275.

  • Henderson, M, and Reinke, W.C.: In Kass, E.H., editor . Progress in Pyelonephritis, Philadelphia, 1965. F A Davis Company,p 27.

  • Brumfitt W. The effects of bacteriuria of pregnancy on maternal and fetal health. Kidney Int. 1975; 8(suppl.):113-19.

  • Kincaid-Smith P. Bacteriuria and urinary infection in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1968;11:533–49

  • Hoja, W. A. Hefner, J. D. and Smith, M.R,:Obst.& Gynae. 24: 458, 1964.


Abstract Views: 245

PDF Views: 0




  • Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women and its Association with Pregnancy Outcome

Abstract Views: 245  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Karya Urmila
Deptt. of Obst & Gynae, LLRM Medical College, Meerut, India
Kausar Uzma
Deptt. of Obst & Gynae, LLRM Medical College, Meerut, India
Bhatnagar Manjul
Deptt. of S.P.M. SIMS Medical College, Hapur, India

Abstract


Objective

To study the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria(ABU) in pregnant women& its association with pregnancy outcome.

Method

A Descriptive Study (Cross Section) was done in 800 antenatal women up to 28 weeks during the year 2009- 2010.Urine culture was done after recording patient obstetrical, personal, past history, clinical examination. Out of which 48 (Group-A) found having ABU (>1×105 CFU/ml), while 752(Group-B) were not having any bacteriuria. Both the Groups were further followed monthly up to delivery. At the time of delivery perinatal outcome recorded.

Result

Prevalence of ABU is 6% (48/752). E.coli (75%) was common pathogen followed by Staph.saprophyticus, Klebseilla. It is associated with increased risk of Symptomatic UTI as 12.5% bacteruric&2.93%nonbacteruric women develop symptomatic UTI(p<0.001). ABU was found to be associated with Preterm Labour as 20.83% bacteruric&4.8% non-bacteriuric women have preterm labour(p<0.044). It is also associated with Low Birth Weight babies as 16.67% in bacteriuric&6.12%non-bacteriuric women have LBW babies(p<0.049).

Conclusion

ABU is a common infection during pregnancy&it increases the risk of Preterm birth, Low birth weight babies&Symptomatic UTI.


Keywords


Asymptomatic Bacteriuria, CFU-colony Forming Unit, E.coli, Urinary Tract Infection, Preterm Labour

References