Comparison of Pain Response to Heel Prick and Venepuncture in Term Babies
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Objective: The objective of the study was to know the difference in the behavioural pattern that appear with painful stimuli in term neonates and also to compare the pain response to venepuncture&heel prick for blood sampling in term neonates.
Method: 70 healthy term neonates between 37 weeks to 42 weeks of gestational age, who required blood sampling for bilirubin or blood sugar estimation within the first week of life, were selected for the study. Selected cases were equally divided into 2 groups. In group 1, blood sampling was done by venepuncture and in group 2, blood sampling was done by heel prick. The state of arousal in neonates was assessed before the procedure with prechtl and beintema score. The pain following the procedure was measured in terms of behavioural pain score. Oxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate were monitored by a single observer. The data collected was statistically analyzed by using Fisher's 'Z' test.
Results: 1. The behavioural pain response scores were increased in both the groups. 2. In response to painful stimuli, there was increase in heart rate and respiratory rate and decrease in oxygen saturation in both the groups. 3. The study revealed that term neonates who underwent heel prick had higher pain score than venepuncture 4. There was no difference in pain response score between male and female babies in both the groups.
Conclusion: Pain response was more during heal prick than venepuncture. Like adults, babies do experience pain. Hence it is necessary to use analgesia during any painful procedures.
- Merskey H, Albe Fersard DC. Bonico JJ et al. Pain in terms. Pain 1979; 6:249.
- Anand K.J.S, Craig KD. New perspectives on definition of pain. Pain 1996; 67:3-6.
- McGrath P J. Behavioral measures of pain. Progress in pain research & measurement. 1998; 10:83.
- Nandakishor S Kabra & Udani R H Pain in neonate. Indian J Pediatric 1999; 66:121-130
- Anand KJS. The clinical importance of pain & stress in preterm neonates 1996.
- Pokela ML. Pain relief can reduce hypoxemia in distressed neonates during routine treatment procedures. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 379-383.
- Rush forth JA, Levene MI. Behavioral responses to pain in healthy neonates. Arch. Dis child 1994; 70: 174-176.
- Singh H, Singh D, Soni R. K. Comparison of pain response to venepuncture between term & preterm neonates. Indian pediatrics 2000; 37: 179-181.
- Neil MC In tosh, Leonik van veen, Helen Brameyer. Alleviation of the pain of heel prick in preterm infants. Arch Dis child 1994; 70: F177- F181.
- Brown.L. Physiologic response to cutaneous pain in neonates. Neonatal Network 1987; 5:18-21.
- Owens ME, Todt EH. Pain in infancy: Neonatal reaction to heel lance. Pain 1984; 20:7-86.
- Berg KM, Berg WK, Graham FK. Infant heart rate response as a function of stimulus Psychophysiology 1971; 8:30-44.
- LindhV Wiklund, Hakanssons. Heel lancing in Term newborn infants; Pain, 1999; 80:143-148.
- Gonsalves S, Mencer J. Physiological correlates of painful stimulation in preterm infants. Clin J Pain 1993; 9:88-93.
- Shah. V.S., Taddio A., Bennett S. Speodel.D. Neonatal pain response to heel sticks Vs venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Arch Dis child 1997;77:143-144.
- Guinsburg R, Difference in pain expression between male & female newborn infants, Pain 2000, 85:127-133.
- Grunau RVE, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonate’s facial action & cry. Pain 1987; 28: 395-410.
Abstract Views: 297
PDF Views: 0