Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Efficacy of Computerized Tomography (CT) in Identification of Clinically Un-detectable Lymph Nodes in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - an Observational Study
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Background: The most common malignant tumour of head and neck region is Oral squamous cell carcinoma and is the third most common malignancy in India. The most common mode of metastasis is through the cervical lymph nodes. Detection of tumours is mostly done clinically by direct visual examination. The complexity in predicting the presence of metastatic disease in clinically negative necks has lead to wide spread use of elective neck dissection. This present study is intended to evaluate the status of clinically not detectable lymph nodes using.
Computerized Tomography: (CT) which might help in determining the prognosis and treatment plan and also to compare the accuracy between the clinical examination and CT.
Methods: Forty patients who have been histopathologically diagnosed as Oral squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study The patients were subjected to clinical as well as CT examination. The findings of both examinations were correlated with pathological findings from the neck dissection.
Results: Number of True positives detected by clinical examination (CE) versus CT is 7 and 13 respectively (p=0.17). Number of True negatives detected by CE versus CT is 18 and 18 respectively (p=1). Number of False positives detected by CE versus CT is 5 and 5 respectively (p=1). Number of False negatives detected by CE versus CT is 10 and 4 respectively (p=0.1).Sensitivity for CE versus CT is 41.1% and 68.4% respectively (p=0). Specificity for CE versus CT is 78.2% and 78.2% respectively (p=1). Positive Predictive Value for CE versus CT is 58.3% and 72.2% respectively (p=0.001). Negative Predictive Value for CE versus CT is 64.2% and 75% respectively (p=0.001). Accuracy of CE versus CT is 62.5% and 77.5% respectively (p=0.001).
Conclusion: The present result indicates that CT is an important image tool for detection of clinically occult lymph nodes of head and neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and statistically significant over the clinical examination regarding the sensitivity, true predictive value, false predictive value and over all accuracy.
Keywords
- Edzard Wiener, Christoph Pautke, Thomas M. Link. Comparison of 16-slice MSCT and MRI in the assessment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. European Journal of Radiology 58 (2006) 113–118.
- Greenberg, Glick, Ship. Burket’s Oral Medicine. 11th Ed. 2008 BC Decker Inc Hamilton.
- Jatin P Shah, Newell W Johnson, John G Batsakis. Oral Cancer. Martin Dunitz; Taylor and Francis Group 2003.
- Jagdeep S. Thakur, M. L. Sharma, C. Mohan et al. Clinicopathological and radiological evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck malignancies. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. (October-December 2007) 59, 327–331.
- Jonas A. Castelijns Michiel W. M. van den Brekel. Imaging of lymphadenopathy in the neck. Eur Radiol (2002) 12:727–738.
- Van den Brekel MW and Jonas A. Castelijns. Imaging of Lymph Nodes in the Neck. Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol 35, No 1 (January), 2000: 42-53.
- Woolgar JA, Beirne JC, Vaughan ED, Lewis-Jones HG, Scott J, Brown JS. Correlation of histopathologic findings with clinical and radiologic assessments of cervical lymph-node metastases in oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24:30–37.
- Shu-Hang Ng et al. Imaging of Neck Metastases – Review. Chang Gung Med J Vol. 29 No. 2; March-April 2006.
- Popperl G. Lang S, Dagdelen O, Jager L, Tiling R, Hahn K and Tatsch K. Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recerrency of head and neck cancer. Rofo. 2002 Jun; 174(6); 714-720.
- Feinmesser R, Freeman JL, Noyek AM, Birt D, Gullane P, Mullen JB. MRI and neck metastasis: A Clinical/ Radiological/ Pathological Correlative Study. J Otolaryngol 1990; 91:136–40.
- Leicher-Düber A, Bleier R et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography. Rofo. 1990 Nov;153(5):575-579.
- Steinkamp HJ, Zwicker C, Langer M, et al.Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerzed tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison. Rofo. 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-311.
- Altuna Mariezkurrena X, Henríquez Alarcón M et al. Palpation and CT to evaluate the cervical adenopathies in head and neck tumours. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2004 Apr;55(4):182-189.
- Ilknur Haberal et al. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: Palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography? Otolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery Volume 130 Number 2:197-201.
- Rottey S et al. Evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: a comparative study between palpation, Ultrasonography, ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology and computed tomography. Acta Clin Belg. 2006 Sep-Oct; 61(5):236-241.
- Alain Luciani et al. Lymph node imaging: Basic principles. European Journal of Radiology 58 (2006) 338–344.
- Carvalho P, Baldwin D, Carter R, Parsons C. Accuracy of CT in detecting squamous carcinoma metastases in cervical lymph nodes. Clin Radiol. 1991 Aug; 44(2):79-81.
- Ako´lu E, Dutipek M, Beki_´ R. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol. 2005 Dec;34(6):384-394.
- Friedman M, Shelton VK, Mafee M, et al. Metastatic neck disease. Evaluation by computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110:443-447.
Abstract Views: 301
PDF Views: 0