Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Standardized Index of Shoulder Function: Validation of an effective Tool for Assessing Disability in Frozen Shoulder Patients
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Background: Various tools are available for assessing disability in upper limb musculoskeletal disorders but there is a need to find a safe, quick, condition specific and more accurate assessment tool to assess upper limb disability in frozen shoulder patients.
Objective: To find a correlation in between the scores of QuickDASH-9, SPADI and F12S tools.
Methodology: In this study 60 subjects, both male and female were taken between age group (51±5.374 years) . Patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder (phase-1) were included in the study based on their orthopedic assessment and inclusion criteria. QuickDASH-9, SPADI and F12S were then administered for assessing pain and disability in these patients.
Result: Correlation was observed between SPADI, Quick DASH-9 and F12S scores at p
Interpretation and conclusion: All the 3 tools can be used to assess pain and disability in frozen shoulder patients (phase I). Quick DASH-9 is simple, quick and subjective tool based on functional activity questions and assesses disability of shoulder , arm and hand while F12S is more condition specific tool that assesses only shoulder joint and muscle pathology. F12S has both subjective and objective components. Hence it can be considered as a more specific tool for assessing disability in frozen shoulder patients.
Keywords
F12 S, Frozen Shoulder, Phase I Patients
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Rockwood CA, editor. The Shoulder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1990.
- Grubbs N. Frozen shoulder syndrome: A review of literature. JOSPT1993; 18(3):479-487.
- Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C: Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 51:642-651.
- Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005; 48: 298–306.
- Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand).. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602–608.
- Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, et al: Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil 2008,22(8):749-757.
- Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. Musculoskelet Disord 2003.
- C Philip Gabel, Michael Yelland et al A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10: 161.
- Bot SDM, Terwee CB,et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–341.
- Badalanmenti S, Roubal PJ, Freeman DC, Walleman KM, Parrot A, Wiater JM. Shoulder outcome measures. A comparison of 6 functional tests. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1270–1277.
- Roddey TS, Olson SL,et al. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Singleadministration reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:759–768.
- MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachkin K. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:12.
- Buchbinder R, Hoving JL, et al. Short course prednisolone for adhesive capsulitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1460–1469.
- Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM et al. Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004; 47: 389–395.
- Fermanian J. Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined? Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005; 48: 281–287.
- Arnaud Dupeyron et al: heterogeneous assessment of shoulder disorder validation of standardized index of shoulder function. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 967–972.
- Bankes MJ, Crossman JE, Emery RJ. A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 116–121.
- Mac Dermid JC, Ramos J et al. The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 593–598.
- Susan L Heald, Daniel L Riddleet al The Shoulder Pain and DisabilityIndex: The Construct Validity and Responsiveness of a Region-Specific Disability Measure Phys Ther. 1997; 77:1079-1089.
- J. M. WALKER,DEBBIE SUE, et al Active Mobility of the Extremities in Older Subjects Phys Ther. 1984; 64:919-923.
- Einar Kristian Tveitå, Leiv Sandvik et al Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008, 9:103.
- Kocher MS, Horan MP, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2006–2011.
- Bostrom C, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nordemar R. Relationships between measurements of impairment, disability, pain, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with shoulder problems. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24: 352–359.
- Megan, Davidson, Janifer comparison of five low back disability questionnaires reliability and responsiveness Phys Ther 2002; 82 ;1 ; 8-24.
- Kyria Petuskey A, Anita Bagley Upper extremity kinematics during functional activities:Threedimensional studies in a normal pediatric population Gait & Posture 25 (2007) 573–579.
Abstract Views: 706
PDF Views: 0