Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The effect of Hamstring and Calf Tightness on Static, Dynamic Balance and Mobility - A Correlation Study


Affiliations
1 Parul Institute of Physiotherapy, At P.O. limda, Ta.Waghodia, Vadodara, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: There are certain factors which affect the balance and which are associated with the systems i.e. sensory, motor and CNS integration. Muscle tightness is one of the commonest motor system factor which affect the balance.Tightness of calf and hamstring may affect static, dynamic balance of body and mobility.

Objective: The study is intended to find correlation between calf tightness and hamstring. Tightness with static, dynamic stability and balance in adult population.

Method: 30 subjects between age group of 40-60 yr were selected. Tightness of calf and hamstring were measured. The calf tightness was measured by taking difference between active and passive dorsiflexion range. The hamstring tightness was measured by using AKET. Following outcome measures were taken to find the correlation with the tightness.

Outcome measures:

1) Functional Reach Test for static stability (Forward & Backward Reach)(FRT)

2) Time Up and Go test for mobility(TUG)

3) Berg Balance Scale for balance (BBS)

Study design: Experimental randomized clinical trial

Sampling technique: Purposive random sampling from adult population

Results: The data was analyzed by using Pearson correlation (2-tailed) technique. The hypothesis is accepted and thus it suggests that there is correlation between tightness, balance and mobility. Hamstrings and calf tightness shows highly positive correlation with TUG (r for hams and TUG = 9.45, r for calf and TUG =8.62) and highly negative correlation with FRT and BBS (r for hams and FRT, forward= -8.10, r for hams and FRT, backward = -7.75, r for hams and BBS = -7.06, r for calf and FRT, forward -9.62,r for calf and FRT, backward = -8.96, r for calf and BBS = -9.25).

Conclusion: Hamstrings and calf tightness shows highly positive correlation with mobility and highly negative correlation with static dynamic balance. Therefore the present study suggests that the correlation exists between tightness, static, dynamic balance and mobility.


Keywords

Mobility, TUG, FRT, BBS, AKET, Hamstring Tightness, Calftightness
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Susan B o'sullivan, Thomas j Schmitz: static, dynamic balance and mobility.

  • Zachezeweski IE. Improving flexibility. In Physical Therapy. Sally RW (Eds.) Philadelphia: J.P. Lippincott Co., 1989; 698-699.

  • Grossman MR, Sahnnann SA, Rose SJ. Review of length-associated changes in muscle. Physical Therapy 1982; 62: 1799-1807.

  • Bohannon RW. Effect of repeated 8 minutes loading on the angle of straight leg raising. Physical Therapy 1984; 64: 491-497.

  • Davies JG, Malone T, Basset FH. Knee examination. Physical Therapy 1980; 60: 15651573.

  • Moore KL. Lower limbs. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 3rd Edition. Baltimore: William and Wilkins, 1992; 421-423.

  • Rubenstein, L.Z.., & Josephson, k.r.falls and their prevention in elderly. Medical clinics of North American, 807-824.

  • Gray-miceli, n.e.a stepwise approach to a comprehensive post-fall assessment. Annals of long term care: clinical care and aging, 13(12), 16- 24.

  • Ducan PW, weiner DK, Prescott B.Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans.1992; 47:m93-m98.

  • Ducan PW, weiner DK,A new clinical measure of balance.1990; 45:M192-M197.

  • Podsiadlo D, The Timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. 1991; 39:142-148.

  • Shum way-Cook A, Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed "Up & Go" Test. Phys Their. 2000; 80:896-903.

  • Wood-Dauphinee S, Berg K, Bravo G, and Williams JI: The Balance Scale: Responding to clinically meaningful changes. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 10: 35-50, 1997.

  • Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI: The Balance Scale: Reliability assessment for elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehab Med, 27:27-36, 1995.


Abstract Views: 1829

PDF Views: 0




  • The effect of Hamstring and Calf Tightness on Static, Dynamic Balance and Mobility - A Correlation Study

Abstract Views: 1829  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Chaitali Shah
Parul Institute of Physiotherapy, At P.O. limda, Ta.Waghodia, Vadodara, India

Abstract


Background: There are certain factors which affect the balance and which are associated with the systems i.e. sensory, motor and CNS integration. Muscle tightness is one of the commonest motor system factor which affect the balance.Tightness of calf and hamstring may affect static, dynamic balance of body and mobility.

Objective: The study is intended to find correlation between calf tightness and hamstring. Tightness with static, dynamic stability and balance in adult population.

Method: 30 subjects between age group of 40-60 yr were selected. Tightness of calf and hamstring were measured. The calf tightness was measured by taking difference between active and passive dorsiflexion range. The hamstring tightness was measured by using AKET. Following outcome measures were taken to find the correlation with the tightness.

Outcome measures:

1) Functional Reach Test for static stability (Forward & Backward Reach)(FRT)

2) Time Up and Go test for mobility(TUG)

3) Berg Balance Scale for balance (BBS)

Study design: Experimental randomized clinical trial

Sampling technique: Purposive random sampling from adult population

Results: The data was analyzed by using Pearson correlation (2-tailed) technique. The hypothesis is accepted and thus it suggests that there is correlation between tightness, balance and mobility. Hamstrings and calf tightness shows highly positive correlation with TUG (r for hams and TUG = 9.45, r for calf and TUG =8.62) and highly negative correlation with FRT and BBS (r for hams and FRT, forward= -8.10, r for hams and FRT, backward = -7.75, r for hams and BBS = -7.06, r for calf and FRT, forward -9.62,r for calf and FRT, backward = -8.96, r for calf and BBS = -9.25).

Conclusion: Hamstrings and calf tightness shows highly positive correlation with mobility and highly negative correlation with static dynamic balance. Therefore the present study suggests that the correlation exists between tightness, static, dynamic balance and mobility.


Keywords


Mobility, TUG, FRT, BBS, AKET, Hamstring Tightness, Calftightness

References