Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Criterion-Validity of the Omron BF 302 Body Fat Monitor


Affiliations
1 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria
2 Department of Physiotherapy, University Health Service, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: The introduction and application of an instrument to measure an attribute or several attributes should be preceded by the establishment of the psychometric properties of such instrument. One of such properties is validity. The study is aimed at finding out the validity of the Omron BF 302 body fat monitor.

Method: The study involved 139 subjects comprising 75 men and 64 women. Their ages ranged from 21-71 years. Weight and height were measured using appropriate instruments and body mass index was calculated. Percentage fat and fat mass were measured using the Omron BF 302 body fat monitor. Descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation were used to present values and Pearson correlation coefficient method was employed to determine the relationship between the calculated body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat and fat mass.

Results: The BMI correlated strongly and positively with both % fat and fat mass (r= 0.835 and r=0.893 respectively) at level of significance of p=0.000. Weight also had positive correlations with % fat and fat mass while height was negatively correlated with % fat but positively with fat mass.

Conclusions: The Omron BF 302 body fat monitor is a valid indicator of body fatness in adults. The Omron BF 302 body fat monitor has high sensitivities and specificities and therefore is a valid measure of obesity in adults. It is recommended for use in adult populations.


Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • McDoweell, I and Newell, C: Measuring Health a Guide in rating scales and questionnaire. Oxford University Press; 1996: 94-97.
  • Ode JJ, Pivarnik JM, Reeves MJ, Knous JL: Body mass index as a predictor of fat in college athletes and nonathletes. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2007, 39:403-409.
  • Lee K, Lee S, Kim SY, Kim SJ, Kim YJ: Percent body fat cutoff values for classifying overweight and obesity recommended by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) in Korean children. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007, 16(4):649-5.
  • World Health Expert Consultation: Appropriate body mass index index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004, 157-163.
  • Wellens, RI, Roche, AF, Khamis, HJ, Jackson, AS, Pollock, ML, & Siervogel, RM: Relationships between the Body Mass Index and body composition. Obes Res, 1996, 4(1), 35-44.
  • Ocker LB, Melrose DR: Examining the Validity of the Body Mass Index Cut-Off Score for Obesity of Different Ethnicities. Journal of Multicultural, Gender and Minority Studies: 2004, 2(1).
  • Powell, A, Teichtah, AJ, Wluka, AE, Cicuttini, F: Obesity: A preventive risk for large joint osteoarthritis which may act through biomechanical factors. Brit J Sport Med 2005, 39:4-2955.

Abstract Views: 910

PDF Views: 0




  • The Criterion-Validity of the Omron BF 302 Body Fat Monitor

Abstract Views: 910  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kayode I. Oke
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria
Olumide O. Dada
Department of Physiotherapy, University Health Service, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Abstract


Background: The introduction and application of an instrument to measure an attribute or several attributes should be preceded by the establishment of the psychometric properties of such instrument. One of such properties is validity. The study is aimed at finding out the validity of the Omron BF 302 body fat monitor.

Method: The study involved 139 subjects comprising 75 men and 64 women. Their ages ranged from 21-71 years. Weight and height were measured using appropriate instruments and body mass index was calculated. Percentage fat and fat mass were measured using the Omron BF 302 body fat monitor. Descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation were used to present values and Pearson correlation coefficient method was employed to determine the relationship between the calculated body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat and fat mass.

Results: The BMI correlated strongly and positively with both % fat and fat mass (r= 0.835 and r=0.893 respectively) at level of significance of p=0.000. Weight also had positive correlations with % fat and fat mass while height was negatively correlated with % fat but positively with fat mass.

Conclusions: The Omron BF 302 body fat monitor is a valid indicator of body fatness in adults. The Omron BF 302 body fat monitor has high sensitivities and specificities and therefore is a valid measure of obesity in adults. It is recommended for use in adult populations.


References