Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study to Find out the effect of Ultrasound with end Range Mobilization Over Cryotherapy with end Range Mobilization on Pain in Frozen Shoulder


Affiliations
1 Sports and Exercise Medicine Department, Manipal Hospital, 98, Rustam Bagh Road, HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, India
2 Deloitte Consulting Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: Effectiveness of any individualized therapeutic modality in reducing pain in frozen shoulder is questionable and the combination of therapies has contradictory results.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to check the effectiveness of Ultrasound with end range mobilization over Cryotherapy with end range mobilization in alleviating pain of patients with frozen shoulder.

Method: Forty subjects diagnosed to have frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to two groups. Subjects in Group I received Ultrasound and End range mobilization of shoulder while subjects in Group II got Cryotherapy and End range mobilization of shoulder. Both the groups were treated once a day, 6 days a week for 4 weeks. Response to pain was considered as the outcome measure.

Results: Data analysis was done considering p

Conclusion: Ultrasound with end range mobilization produced better pain relief compared to cryotherapy with end range mobilization and therefore can be recommended as a safe treatment for frozen shoulder.


Keywords

Frozen Shoulder, Ultrasound, End Range Mobilization, Cryotherapy
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Lori B Siegal, Norman J Cohen, Eric P Gall (1999); Adhesive capsulitis: A Sticky Issue; American Family Physician; 59 (7).

  • Reeves B; The natural history of the frozen shoulder syndrome (1975); Scand J Rheumatol; 4(4): 193-196.

  • Robert A Donatelli, Micheal J & Wooden (2009); Orthopedic Physical Therapy; 3rd ed, Churchill Livingstone publication; 153-158.

  • Foster Angela, Nigel padastanga (1999); Clayton’s Electrotherapy; 9th edition; 199-208.

  • Rizk TE, Christopher RP, Pinals RS, Higgins AC, Frix R (1983); Adhesive capsulitis: a new approach to its management; Arch Physical Medicine Rehabilitation; Jan; 64 (1): 29 –33.

  • Williams JW Jr, Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL (1995); Measuring shoulder function with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; J Rheumatol: 22(4): 727-32.

  • McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988); Clinical applications of Visual Analogue Scales: A critical review; Psychol Med: 18(4): 1007-19.

  • Vermeulen HM, Obermann WR, Burger BJ, Gea J Kok, Piet M Rozing, and Cornelia HM van den Ende (2000); End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a multiple-subject case report; Phys Ther; 80:1240- 1213.

  • Grey RG (1978). The natural history of “idiopathic” frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 60:564.

  • Rowe CR, Leffert RD (1988); Idiopathic chronic adhesive capsulitis (“frozen shoulder”). In: Rowe CR, ed. The Shoulder. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc;155–163.

  • Kay NR (1981); The clinical diagnosis and management of frozen shoulders. Practitioner; 225:164 –172.

  • Lewit K. Manuelle Medizin. Leipzig, Germany: Johann Ambrosius Barth; 1977.

  • Bulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, et al (1984); Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis; 43:353–360.

  • Mens JM, de Wolf AN (1991); Wat is de meest adequate behandeling van een zogenaamde frozen shoulder? Respons; 2(10):1–3.

  • van der Korst JK (1980). Periarthritis scapulohumeralis beschouwd vanuit de reumatologie. Nederlands Tijdschrift vor Fysiotherapie; 9:260 –263.

  • Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001); A review of therapeutic ultrasound - effectiveness studies, Physical Therapy; 81(7): 1339-50.


Abstract Views: 1173

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Study to Find out the effect of Ultrasound with end Range Mobilization Over Cryotherapy with end Range Mobilization on Pain in Frozen Shoulder

Abstract Views: 1173  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shahbaz Nawaz Ansari
Sports and Exercise Medicine Department, Manipal Hospital, 98, Rustam Bagh Road, HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, India
Shikhsha Shah
Deloitte Consulting Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India

Abstract


Background: Effectiveness of any individualized therapeutic modality in reducing pain in frozen shoulder is questionable and the combination of therapies has contradictory results.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to check the effectiveness of Ultrasound with end range mobilization over Cryotherapy with end range mobilization in alleviating pain of patients with frozen shoulder.

Method: Forty subjects diagnosed to have frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to two groups. Subjects in Group I received Ultrasound and End range mobilization of shoulder while subjects in Group II got Cryotherapy and End range mobilization of shoulder. Both the groups were treated once a day, 6 days a week for 4 weeks. Response to pain was considered as the outcome measure.

Results: Data analysis was done considering p

Conclusion: Ultrasound with end range mobilization produced better pain relief compared to cryotherapy with end range mobilization and therefore can be recommended as a safe treatment for frozen shoulder.


Keywords


Frozen Shoulder, Ultrasound, End Range Mobilization, Cryotherapy

References