A Comparative Study on Immediate Effect of Adductor Stretch Mwm Versus Met in Subjects with Hip Adductor Tightness - Randomized Clinical Trial
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Study Design: Randomized Clinical trial.
Objective: To study and compare the effectiveness of Adductor Stretch MWM and MET on Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test in subject with hip adductor tightness.
Methods: In this study 40 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Group A (n-20) received single session of Adductor Stretch MWM on both sides. Group B (n-20) received single session MET on both sides. We measured pre-intervention and post intervention Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test. Data was analyse using t-test.
Results: The group treated with Adductor Stretch MWM showed significant improvement in Intermalleolar distance (p<0.001), Single leg hop test (p<0.001) and Star excursion balance test (p<0.001) as compared to MET group.Result showed a significant difference within the groups post intervention.
Conclusion: A single application of Adductor Stretch MWM is better as compared to MET to release hip adductor tightness, improve muscle flexibility and balance.
Keywords
- Holmich P. Adductor related groin pain in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 1997; 5:285–91.
- Lovell G. The diagnosis of chronic groin pain in athletes: a review of 189 cases. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1995; 27:76–9.
- Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J SportsMed 2004; 32:5–16.
- Tyler TF et al; The association of hip strength and flexibility with the incidence of adductor muscle strains in professional ice hockey players. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29:124–8.
- Mulligan B, Manual Therapy - NAGAS, SNAGS, MWMS etc, New Zealand, 6th edition, 2010; 127-128.
- Toby Hall et al; Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy 11 (2006); 130–135.
- Smith M, Fryer G. A comparison of two muscle energy techniques for increasing the flexibility hamstring muscle group. J Bodyw Mov Ther. Oct2008;12(4):312 317.
- Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garrett SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI). J Rheumatol 1994; 21:1694-8.
- Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, Alcock GK, Griffin JR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physical Therapy. 2007; 87(3): 337-349.
- Hertel, J., Miller, S., & Denegar, C. Intratester and intertester reliability during the Star Excursion Balance Tests. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation 2000; 9: 104-116.
- Ballantyne F, et al; The effect of muscle energy technique on hamstring extensibility: the mechanism of altered flexibility. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2003; 6(2):59-63.
- Lederman, E. (2005). The Science and Practice of Manual Therapy. (2nd edition.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
- Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P, Dyhre- Poulsen P, McHugh MP, Kjaer M. Mechanical and physical responses to stretching with and without preisometric contraction in human skeletal muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:373-378.
- Kutchera, W. A. & Kutchera, M. L. (1994). Osteopathic Principles in Practice (2nd edition.). Columbus Ohio: Greyden Press.
- Fryer, G. & Ruszkowski, W. (2004). The influence of contraction duration in muscle energy technique applied to the atlanto axial joint. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 7(2), 79 84.
Abstract Views: 1082
PDF Views: 0