Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
To Assess the Prevalence of Generalised Hypermobility in School Children of Dharwad (urban), Karnataka
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Objectives: The term generalised joint hypermobility indicates that the range of motion in general is increased compared with the mean range of motion of the general population. Generalised joint hypermobility is claimed to be present in 5-15% of general population. Children possess an inherently greater range of motion in their joints than adults, with a gradual reduction in this range observed with age. This study was done to assess the prevalence of generalized hypermobility in 6-12 years aged school children of Dharwad (Urban).
Design: Cross sectional study
Methods: 420 healthy children were evaluated using Beighton score. Passive extension of fifth finger (>90º), passive apposition of thumb to forearm, active extension of elbow and knee (>10º) and anterior trunk flexion placing flat hand on ground were assessed. One point was scored for each positive result (maximum: 9). Scores>4 were considered to be generalised hypermobility. The data were evaluated statistically using SPSS 16.0 version statistical software and results were obtained.
Results: Generalised hypermobility was found to be 34.29% of the children. Hypermobility was more among girls (35.12%) than boys (33.73%). Hypermobility was 41.94% in the age group of 6-6.11 years, 30% in 7-7.11 years of age group, 26.23% in 8-8.11 years of age group, 18.97% in 9-9.11 years of age group, 54.84% in 10-10.11 years of age group, 38.60% in 11-11.11 years of age group and 33.33% in 12 years of age group.
Conclusion: The prevalence of generalised hypermobility was 34.29% in 6-12 years school children of Dharwad (Urban).
Keywords
- Lamari NM, Chueire AG, Cordeiro JA. Analysis of joint mobility patterns among preschool children. Sao Paulo Med J 2005 May 2;123(3): 119-23.
- Adib N, Davies K, Grahame R, Woo P, Murray KJ. Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005 Jun;44(6):744-750.
- Tofts LJ, Elliott EJ, Munns C, Pacey V, Sillence DO. The differential diagnosis of children with joint hypermobility: a review of the literature. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2009 Jan 5;7:1.
- Juul Kristensen B, Rogind H, Jensen DV, Remvig L. Inter-examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007 Dec;46(12):1835-41.
- Hanewinkel van Kleef YB, Helders PJ, Takken T, Engelbert RH. Motor performance in children with generalized hypermobility: the influence of muscle strength and exercise capacity. Pediatr Phys Ther 2009 Summer;21(2):194-200.
- van der Giessen LJ, Liekens D, Rutgers KJ, Hartman A, Mulder PG, Oranje AP. Validation of Beighton score and prevalence of connective tissue signs in 773 Dutch children. J Rheumatol 2001 Dec;28(12):2726-30.
- Erkula G, Kiter AE, Kilic BA, Er E, Demirkan F, Sponseller PD. The relation of joint laxity and trunk rotation. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005 Jan;14(1):38-41.
- EI Metwally A, Salminen JJ, Auvinen A, Macfarlane G, Mikkelsson M. Risk factors for development of non-specific musculoskeletal pain in preteens and early adolescents: a prospective 1- year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet disord 2007 May 23;8:46.
- Alter Michael J. Science of flexibility. 3rd ed. United States of America: Sheridan Books; 1952. p. 88-96.
- Russek LN. Hypermobility syndrome. Phys Ther1999 Jun;79(6):591-99.
- Subramanyam V, Janaki KV. Joint hypermobility in south Indian children. Indian Pediatr 1996 Sep;33(9):771-2.
- Hasija RP, Khubchandani RP, Shenoi S. Joint hypermobility in Indian children. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008 Jan-Feb;26(1):146-50.
- RikkenBultman DG, Wellink L, van Dongen PW. Hypermobility in two Dutch school populations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997 Jun;73(2):189-92.
Abstract Views: 408
PDF Views: 0