A Comparative Study of Effectivenes of Ultrasound and Massage Combined and Massage alone in Treatment of Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Study Objective: To compare effects of Deep friction massage and Ultrasound Therapy combined and Deep Friction Massage alone in supraspinatus tendinitis.
Design: Quasi experimental
Method and Measurements: 30 patients from RNH [Age group 20-70 yrs] who were diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinitis, with onset ?1-3 months (chronic) were randomly assigned to either group A receiving DFM and US combined or group B receiving DFM alone. Treatment was given for 6 consecutive settings. Before treatment and after 6th day of treatment pain was assessed on VAS and MPQ.
Results: Subjects in-group A that received Ultrasound and deep friction massage showed greater. Improvement in pain compared with the deep friction massage group on 6th day compared with pre treatment.
Conclusion: The result of study suggests that Ultrasound and deep friction massage improves the pain symptoms of supraspinatus tendinitis. Deep friction massage alone improved the pain symptoms but was too small to reach satisfactory outcome for patients. Based on these results Ultrasound and deep friction massage should be the treatment of choice for supraspinatus tendinitis rather than deep friction massage alone.
Keywords
- Pope D, Croft P, Pritchard C & Silman A (1997), the prevalence of shoulder pain in the community. The influence of case definition. Annals of the Rheumatic diseases 56:308-312
- Inman VT, Saunder M, Abbott LC. Observations on the function of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surgery 26 A: 1, 1944
- Griegel – Morris P, Larson K, Mueller – Klaus K incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder & thoracic regions & their associations with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phy. Therapy72:6, 1992
- Poppen NK, Walker PS: Normal & abnormal motion of the shoulder, J Bone Joint Surgery 58A: 195, 1978.
- Janda U: Muscles, Central nervous motor regulation & back problems. P 29. In Korr I Ed the neurobiological mechanisms in spinal manipulative therapy. Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
- Kendall FP, Mc Creary EK: Muscles, testing & function 3rd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983.
- Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC: Impingement syndrome in athletes. AM J Sports Med 8: 151, 1990.
- Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Yoahiyaki N. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion J Bone Joint Surgery 70A: 1224, 1998.
- Cantu R, Grodin A: Myofascial manipulation, Aspen publishing, Gaithusburg, and HD, 1992.
- Low, J & Reed, A (2000) Electrotherapy explained:- Principles & practice, Butter Worth Heinemann, Oxford (a) 191, 365(b) (195-207.)
- Greet JMG, Van der Heijden, Dannielle AW M van der Windth, and Andrea F de Winter. (1997), Physiotherapy for patients with soft tissue disorders, a systematic review of randomized clinical trail 315:25-30
- Barbara J Behrens, Susan L Michlobitz (physical agent theory & practical.)
- Tidy’s Physiotherapy 12th edition, pg 58, Annthomson, Alison skinner, Joan Piercy, 1996
- Gibbon, WW, Cooper, JR and Radcliffe, GS (1999) Sonographic incidence of tendon micro tears in athletes with chronic Achilles tendinosis, British Journal of sports medicine, 33, 2, 129-130.
- Naslund, J (2001) ‘Modes of sensory stimulation, clinical trials and physiological aspects’ physiotherapy: 87, 8, 413-423
- Baker KG, Robertson VJ and Duck FA (2001) A review of therapeutic Ultrasound: - Biophysical effects, Physical effects, Physical therapy, 81, 7, 1351-58
- Wadsworth, H and Chanmurgan, APP (1980). Electrophysical agents in physiotherapy, science press, Marrick ville, NSW, Australia
- Pg 396, physical therapy of the shoulder 3rd edition 1997
- Fritschy, D & De Gautard, R (1998) Jumpers knee and ultrasonography, American journal of sports medicine, 16,6,637-640 Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E: A
- Comparison of pain rating scales by sampling clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2001 March; 17(1): 104-5
Abstract Views: 1255
PDF Views: 0