Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparitive Study of Early Intervention Programme Vs Home Intervention Programme in Preterm Infants


Affiliations
1 Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India
2 Gian Sagar Medical College & Hospital, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: Prematurity as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) is a baby born before 37 weeks of gestation counting from the first day of the last menstrual period. Infants born at early gestational ages (<32 weeks), when compared with later ages (32-36) weeks scored lower on tests of gross motor development. So mild abnormalities detected in first few months would improve with early intervention programme.

Methods: The preterm infants born before 37 gestational weeks and having APGAR score above 7 (after 5 minutes) were randomly selected and divided into two groups (N=15). Early developmental intervention programme was given to one group and home intervention programme was given to other group (control group). The outcome measure was Gross Motor Function Measure.

Results: According to the need of the study unpaired t-test was applied and significant improvement was seen.

Conclusion: Greater improvement in motor performance of preterm infants who received the early intervention programme when compared with home intervention was revealed.


Keywords

Preterm, Motor Development, Gross Motor Function Measure, Motor Delay, Early Intervention, Home Intervention
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen MC (2008) Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. Current Opinion in Neurology, 21 (2); 123-128.
  • Annette Majnemer (1998) Benefits of early intervention for children with developmental disabilities. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 5(1); 62-69. References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
  • Barrera ME, Cunningham CE and Rosenbaum PL (1986) Low birth weight and home intervention strategies: preterm infants. Journal of Development and Behaviour Pediatric, 7(6); 361-366.
  • Bracewell M and Marlow N (2002) Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 8 (4); 241-248.
  • Campbell SK, Vanderlinder DW and Palisano RJ (2000) Physical therapy for children. WB saunders company; Philadelphia.
  • Cameron EC, Maehle V and Reid J (2005) The effect of early physical therapy intervention for very preterm, very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 17(2); 107-119.
  • Case-Smith J (1993) Postural and fine motor control in pre term infants in the first six months. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13; 1-17.
  • Chiarello LA and Palisano RJ (1998) Investigation of the effects of a model of physical therapy on mother child interactions and the motor behavior of children with motor delay. Physical Therapy, 78 (2); 180-194.
  • Cole JH (1988) The evaluation of an intervention programme of sensory motor facilitation for very preterm, very low birth weight infants. Phd Thesis, The University of Queensland.
  • Girarda N, Confort-Gouny S, Schneider J, Barberet M, Chapon F, Viola A, Pineau S, Combaz X, Cozzone P (2007) MRI of brain maturation. Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(1); 290-310.
  • Hemgren E and Persson K (2002) Motor performance and behavior in preterm and full term infant 3 year old children. Child Health Development, 28(3); 219-226.
  • Lekskulchai R and J Cole (2001) Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47 (1); 169-176.
  • Mathew TJ and Macdorman MF (2006) Infant mortality statistics from the 2003 period linked birth/infant death data set. National vital statistical reports, 54 (16); 25-30.
  • Milani—comparetti AM and Gidoni EA (1967) Routine developmental examination in normal and retarded children. Development Medicine and Child Neurology, 9( 2); 631-638.
  • Mohamed EL-Dib, Massaro A, Penny G & Hany A (2011) Neurodevelopmental assessment of the new born: An opportunity for prediction of outcome. Brain and Development, 33 (2); 95-105.
  • Morgan AM, Koch V and Lee V (1988) Neonatal neurobehavioral examination. Physical Therapy, 68 (1); 1352-1358
  • Peter GB Johnston, Kirstie Flood and Karen Spinks (2003) The new born child, 2nd Edition, Elsevier; London.
  • Piper MC et al (1986) Early physical therapy effect on the high risk infant: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric, 78 (2); 216-224.
  • Ruiz MP, Fever JA and Hakanson DO (1981) Early development of infants of birth weight less than 1000 grams with reference to mechanical ventilation in new born period. Journal of Pediatric, 68 (1); 330-335.
  • Stacy B, Daniel W, Lale S, Ana PB, Maria M, Jennifer HR, Craig R, Ram Kumar M and Paul FA (2010) The world wide incidence of preterm birth : A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organistaion, 88(1); 31-38.
  • Steer P (2005) The epidemiology of preterm labour. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 112 (1); 3-10.
  • Singh U, Singh N, Shikha S (2007) A perspective analysis of etiology and outcome of preterm labor. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India, 57(1); 48-52.
  • World health organization motor development study (2006) Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatrica Supplement, 450(1); 86-95.
  • World Health Organization (1993) Promoting the development of young children with cerebral palsy: A guide for mid-level rehabilitation workers. Geneva: WHO.

Abstract Views: 419

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparitive Study of Early Intervention Programme Vs Home Intervention Programme in Preterm Infants

Abstract Views: 419  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manpreet Mann
Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India
C. Janarthanan
Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India
Kusum Mahajan
Gian Sagar Medical College & Hospital, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India
Jagmohan Singh
Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Distt Patiala, India

Abstract


Background: Prematurity as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) is a baby born before 37 weeks of gestation counting from the first day of the last menstrual period. Infants born at early gestational ages (<32 weeks), when compared with later ages (32-36) weeks scored lower on tests of gross motor development. So mild abnormalities detected in first few months would improve with early intervention programme.

Methods: The preterm infants born before 37 gestational weeks and having APGAR score above 7 (after 5 minutes) were randomly selected and divided into two groups (N=15). Early developmental intervention programme was given to one group and home intervention programme was given to other group (control group). The outcome measure was Gross Motor Function Measure.

Results: According to the need of the study unpaired t-test was applied and significant improvement was seen.

Conclusion: Greater improvement in motor performance of preterm infants who received the early intervention programme when compared with home intervention was revealed.


Keywords


Preterm, Motor Development, Gross Motor Function Measure, Motor Delay, Early Intervention, Home Intervention

References