Indian Journal of Positive Psychology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Marital Commitment and Sense of Loneliness and Conflict Resolution Styles Competing in the Women Referred to Counseling Centers


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this study was to evaluate marital commitment and sense of loneliness and conflict resolution styles competing in the women referred to counseling centers and women competing is the city of Shiraz in 2016. For this purpose, 35 conflicting women referred to counseling centers and 35 non-conflicting women in Shiraz were selected and marital commitment questionnaires, loneliness questionnaire, standard conflict resolution styles questionnaire and marital conflict questionnaire were completed. The results showed that Lambda Wilkes's Significance was significant in contrasting and non-conflicting women (p <0.05). Therefore, at least one dependent variable can be distinguished in two groups with conflicting women and non-conflicting women. Also, the results showed a significant difference in the variables of commitment, conflict resolution styles and loneliness in conflicting and non-conflicting women (p <0.05). Comparison of means shows that non-conflicting women have higher commitment and style and lower loneliness than non-conflicting women.

Keywords

Marital Commitment, Loneliness, Conflict Resolution Style, Marital Conflicts.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Harmon, D.K.H. (2005). Black men and marriage: The impact of spirituality, religiosity and marital commitment on marital satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Alabama University.

  • Hasio, Y. L. (2003). Commitment to marital relationships: The case of American newlyweds. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

  • Heinrich, M.L., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695-718.

  • Hojat, M., & Crandall, R. (1989). Loneliness, theory, research and applications. NewburyPark,CA: Sage.

  • Hynum, S. (2003). Relationship between cultural values and patterns of marital commitment among Korean Americans. Unpublished doctoral dessertaion: University ofTexas.

  • Johenson, M. P. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral. and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160- 177.

  • Johnson, M. P. (1991). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of 'Behavior andPersonality, 10, 923-932.

  • Jones, W. H. (2004). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of SocialBehavior andPersonality, 70(4), 923-932.

  • Krause-Parello, C.A. (2008). Loneliness in the school setting. Journal of School Nursing, 24(2), 66-70.

  • Larson, J. H., Hamond, C. H., & Harper, J. M. (1989). Religiosity and marital commitment: Until death do us part revisted. Family Science Review, 2, 285-302.

  • Masters, A. (2010). Marriage, commitment and divorce in a matching model with differential aging. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 614-628.

  • Mills, S. (2000). Men and marital commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Purdue University.

  • Mosko, J. (2009). Commitment and attachment dimensions. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: Purdue University.

  • Parkhuurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1999). Developmental change in the source of Loneliness in childhood: Constructing a theoretical model. In K. J. Rotenberg and H. Shelley (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 56-79). Cambridge University Press.

  • Peplau, L. A., & Permian, D. (1982).Perspective on loneliness. In L. Peplau and D. Permian (Eds.), Loneliness (pp. 1-18). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Peplau, L. A., & Permian, D. (1999). Loneliness: A source book of current theory. New York: Wiley Series on Personality Processes.

  • Pinquart, M. (2007). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Personal andSocialRelationships, 20, 31-53.

  • Ponzetti, J.J., & Hopmeyer, A. (1999).Loneliness among college students. Family Relations, 39(3),336-340.

  • Qualter, P., Brown, S.L., Rotenberg, K.J., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R.A., Goossens, L.. Bangee, M., & Munn, P. (2013). Trajectories of loneliness during childhood and adolescence: Predictors andhealth outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 15,1-11.

  • Shields, E. P. (2001). The effect of religiosity and marital commitment on marital satisfaction and stability. Unpolished doctoral: Brigham Young University.

  • Tornstam, L. (2004). Loneliness in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 197-217.

  • Wawrzyniak,A. J., &PollardWhiteman,M. C. (2011). Perceived stress, loneliness, and interaction with fellow students does not affect innate mucosal immunity in first year university students. Japanese Psychological Research, 53(2), 121-132.


Abstract Views: 367

PDF Views: 1




  • Evaluation of Marital Commitment and Sense of Loneliness and Conflict Resolution Styles Competing in the Women Referred to Counseling Centers

Abstract Views: 367  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Bahar Ahmadloo
Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Mahboobeh Chinaveh
Department of Psychology, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


The aim of this study was to evaluate marital commitment and sense of loneliness and conflict resolution styles competing in the women referred to counseling centers and women competing is the city of Shiraz in 2016. For this purpose, 35 conflicting women referred to counseling centers and 35 non-conflicting women in Shiraz were selected and marital commitment questionnaires, loneliness questionnaire, standard conflict resolution styles questionnaire and marital conflict questionnaire were completed. The results showed that Lambda Wilkes's Significance was significant in contrasting and non-conflicting women (p <0.05). Therefore, at least one dependent variable can be distinguished in two groups with conflicting women and non-conflicting women. Also, the results showed a significant difference in the variables of commitment, conflict resolution styles and loneliness in conflicting and non-conflicting women (p <0.05). Comparison of means shows that non-conflicting women have higher commitment and style and lower loneliness than non-conflicting women.

Keywords


Marital Commitment, Loneliness, Conflict Resolution Style, Marital Conflicts.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2018%2Fv9i4%2F181018