Indian Journal of Positive Psychology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Support Staff in the Caribbean:How Job Satisfaction is Related to Organizational Commitment?


Affiliations
1 School of Business and Management, University of the Commonwealth Caribbean, 17 Worthington Avenue, Kingston, Jamaica
2 Dissertation Methodologist and Dissertation Chair Grand Canyon University, Arizona, USA, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this quantitative, correlational research was to examine to what degree a relationship existed between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among support staff (cafeteria employees) in a higher educational institution in the Caribbean. The study included a sample of 27 full-time cafeteria employees who worked in a private for profit higher educational institution in the Caribbean. Study participants completed two survey instruments, the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) short form and the Klein Unidimensional Target-free (KUT) scale. The questionnaires were in the form of hard copies. The Spearman rank order coefficient was used to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables of interestjob satisfaction and organizational commitment. Results found that there was a moderate significant positive relationship between overall job satisfaction and overall organizational commitment among cafeteria employees at the for profit higher educational institution.

Keywords

Job Satisfaction, Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, Organizational Commitment.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdullah & Ramay, I. M. (2012). Antecedents of organizational commitment of banking sector employees in Pakistan. Serbian Journal of Management, 7(1), 89-102.

  • Akanbi, P. A., & Itiola, K. A. (2013). Exploring the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among health workers in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of.'Business and Management Sciences, 7,18-22.

  • American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC.

  • Chughtai, A. A., & Zafar, S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment among Pakistani university teachers. AppliedH.R.M. Research, 77(1), 39-64.

  • Chioda, L., & Verde, G. (2016). Work andfamily: Latin American and Caribbean women in search of a new balance. Washington, D.C: World Bank Group. Doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8485-5

  • Creswell, J. (2013) Research design: A qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publication.

  • Davis, K. (1981). Human behavior at -work: Organizational behavior (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.

  • Gebremichael, H., & Rao, B. P. (2013). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment between academic staff and supporting staff (Volaita Sodo University-Ethiopia as a Case). Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, 77, 11-32.

  • Ghiselli, R F., LaLopa, J. M., & Bai, B. (2001). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 28-37.

  • Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environment, and organizational learning on organizational. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229(19), 289-297.

  • Hancer, M., & George, R. (2003). Job satisfaction of restaurant employees: An empirical investigation using the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, -27(1), 85-100.

  • Higginbottom, G. M. A. (2004). Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 72(1), 7-19.

  • Hirschfeld, R C. (2000). Does revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form make a difference? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 255-270.

  • Klein, H., Cooper, J., Molloy, J., & Swanson, J. (2014). The assessment of commitment: Advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 222-238.

  • Leap, T. L., & Crino, M. D. (1993). Personnel/human resource management. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  • Lee, H. Y., & Kamarul Zaman, B. A. (2009). The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behaviour and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 50(1), 53-86.

  • Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2013). Practical research: Planning and design (10th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Likert, R (1932). Atechnique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140,44-53.

  • London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 620-630.

  • Lumley, E. J., Coetzee, M., Tladinyane, R , & Ferreira, N. (2011). Exploring the job satisfaction and organisational commitment of employees in the information technology environment. Southern African Business Review, 75,100-118.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 7(1), 61-89.

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(1), 20-52.

  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.M., & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: Thepsychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Omar, W., & Hussin, F. (2013). Transformational leadership style andjob satisfaction relationship: A study of structural equation modeling (SEM). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(2), 346-365.

  • Parzen,M., Lipsitz, S.,Metters, R., &Fitzmaurice, G. (2010). Correlation when data are missing. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Supply Part Special Issue: Operational Research in Project, 67(6), 1049-1056.

  • Randall, D. M. (1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal oforganizational Behavior, 77(5), 361-378.

  • Robbins, S.P. (1989). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2017). Essentials of 'organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

  • Siders, M. A., George, G., & Dharwadkar, R. (2001). The relationship of internal and external commitment foci to objective job performance measures. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 570-579.

  • Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publication.

  • Sikyr, M. (2013). Best practices in human resource management: The source of excellent performance and sustained competitiveness. CentralEuropean Business Review, 2(1), 43-48

  • Suliman, A., & lies, P. (2000). Is continuance commitment beneficial to organizations? Commitment-performance relationship: A new look. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 75(5), 407-422.

  • Suma, S., & Lesha, J. (2013). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: The case of Shkodra municipality. European Scientific Journal, 9,41-51.

  • Taba, M. I. (2018). Mediating effect of work performance and organizational commitment in the relationship between reward system and employees' work satisfaction. The Journal of Management Development, 37(1), 65-75.

  • Tat, H. H., Pei-Ni, T., & Rasli, A. M. (2012). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a Malaysian public university's library. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 7,1-7.

  • Testa, M.R. (2001). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and effort in the service environment. The Journal of Psychology, 135(2), 226-236.

  • Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating, evaluation, beliefs and effective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 22r 173-194.

  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manualfor the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relation Center.

  • Yousef, D. (2002). Job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between role stressors and organizational commitment: A study from an Arabic cultural perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(4), 250.

  • Yousef, D. (2017). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A Study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 77-88.


Abstract Views: 876

PDF Views: 0




  • Support Staff in the Caribbean:How Job Satisfaction is Related to Organizational Commitment?

Abstract Views: 876  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

David Bennett
School of Business and Management, University of the Commonwealth Caribbean, 17 Worthington Avenue, Kingston, Jamaica
Laurel Stanley
Dissertation Methodologist and Dissertation Chair Grand Canyon University, Arizona, USA, United States

Abstract


The purpose of this quantitative, correlational research was to examine to what degree a relationship existed between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among support staff (cafeteria employees) in a higher educational institution in the Caribbean. The study included a sample of 27 full-time cafeteria employees who worked in a private for profit higher educational institution in the Caribbean. Study participants completed two survey instruments, the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) short form and the Klein Unidimensional Target-free (KUT) scale. The questionnaires were in the form of hard copies. The Spearman rank order coefficient was used to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables of interestjob satisfaction and organizational commitment. Results found that there was a moderate significant positive relationship between overall job satisfaction and overall organizational commitment among cafeteria employees at the for profit higher educational institution.

Keywords


Job Satisfaction, Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, Organizational Commitment.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2019%2Fv10i2%2F185295