Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Integrity Testing: A Projective Inventory Approach


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, DRDO Scientist (Psychologist), Selection Centre East, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Psychology, DRDO Scientist, Defence Institute of Psychological Research, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this study was to develop a projective inventory to measure integrity. The projective inventory (PI) is a 69 item (statements) scale consists of 6 situations designed to measure integrity. Integrity has six dimensions: a) Belief in higher order principles: truth, (b) Money as means not as end, (c) Moral courage: indifference to suffering, (d) Commitment to family and friends, (e) Involvement in corruption and (f) Favoritism. The projective inventory yields a total score and six scores corresponding to the dimensions of integrity. Each score was calculated according to agreement and disagreement to the statements given by the participants during the data collection. The results revealed that the average score on positive dimensions of integrity (moral courage: Indifference to suffering, truth & commitment respectively) were higher than the negative values traits of integrity (involvement in corruption & favoritism). Reliability of the projective inventory integrity is 0.94. The construct (convergent) validity of the test was examined in which the correlation of PI scores with Big Five personality attributes was found to be moderate, which indicates that PI measures something related to existing tools of integrity in slightly different manner. Factor analysis was carried out to find the factor structure of the scale. Factor analysis revealed three factors in terms of indifference to suffering commitment and truth. Taking all the dimensions of integrity together and analyzing the step-wise regression analysis, it was found that indifference to suffering is the best predictor of overall test followed by favoritism, commitment, corruption and truth.

Keywords

Projective Inventory, Commitment, Corruption, Favoritism, Belief In Moral Principles, Moral Courage.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 491

PDF Views: 0




  • Integrity Testing: A Projective Inventory Approach

Abstract Views: 491  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. P. Tripathi
Department of Psychology, DRDO Scientist (Psychologist), Selection Centre East, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
A. Gupta
Department of Psychology, DRDO Scientist, Defence Institute of Psychological Research, Delhi, India
P. Kumar
Department of Psychology, DRDO Scientist (Psychologist), Selection Centre East, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to develop a projective inventory to measure integrity. The projective inventory (PI) is a 69 item (statements) scale consists of 6 situations designed to measure integrity. Integrity has six dimensions: a) Belief in higher order principles: truth, (b) Money as means not as end, (c) Moral courage: indifference to suffering, (d) Commitment to family and friends, (e) Involvement in corruption and (f) Favoritism. The projective inventory yields a total score and six scores corresponding to the dimensions of integrity. Each score was calculated according to agreement and disagreement to the statements given by the participants during the data collection. The results revealed that the average score on positive dimensions of integrity (moral courage: Indifference to suffering, truth & commitment respectively) were higher than the negative values traits of integrity (involvement in corruption & favoritism). Reliability of the projective inventory integrity is 0.94. The construct (convergent) validity of the test was examined in which the correlation of PI scores with Big Five personality attributes was found to be moderate, which indicates that PI measures something related to existing tools of integrity in slightly different manner. Factor analysis was carried out to find the factor structure of the scale. Factor analysis revealed three factors in terms of indifference to suffering commitment and truth. Taking all the dimensions of integrity together and analyzing the step-wise regression analysis, it was found that indifference to suffering is the best predictor of overall test followed by favoritism, commitment, corruption and truth.

Keywords


Projective Inventory, Commitment, Corruption, Favoritism, Belief In Moral Principles, Moral Courage.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2020%2Fv11i4%2F207682